Prioritization and management of inter-enterprise collaborative performance

Collaboration among enterprises has gained attention in the business environment as a means to remain competitive. Enterprises that are collaborating look for improving their performance but, in real assessments, they often do not establish efficient frameworks to structure and manage the enterprise association/inter-enterprise performance. This paper provides a methodology based on the Analytic Network Process (ANP) to prioritize and manage, within a performance management framework, inter-enterprise performance. In addition, this approach allows managing the evolution of the performance status by introducing a model for aggregating actual performance data so that decision makers can evaluate the status of the collaborative relationship and analyze the degree of achievement of the strategy. With this innovative approach, enterprises will obtain significant information for the decision-making process regarding which are the inter-enterprise performance elements that generate a higher impact and, therefore, should be prioritized for improving the enterprise competitiveness. This approach has been applied to a collaborative enterprise network belonging to the renewable energy sector in Spain where managers of the network have validated the results obtained as well as the benefits of the approach in supporting the decision making process. Highlights? We present a methodology to prioritize and manage collaborative relationships. ? It allows to aggregate actual performance data into a global evaluation. ? It focuses on analyzing the degree of achievement of the strategy. ? ANP is used to model and solve the problem. ? A case study is presented.

[1]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Kirti Peniwati,et al.  Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  T. Simatupang,et al.  Applying the theory of constraints to supply chain collaboration , 2004 .

[4]  Joseph Sarkis A STRATEGIC DECISION FRAMEWORK FOR GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2003 .

[5]  Ángel Ortiz Bas,et al.  Quantitative relationships between key performance indicators for supporting decision-making processes , 2009, Comput. Ind..

[6]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach , 2005, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[7]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment , 2001 .

[8]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Strategic analysis of logistics and supply chain management systems using the analytical network process , 1998 .

[9]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[10]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[11]  J. Browne,et al.  Development of an extended enterprise performance measurement system , 2005 .

[12]  Didier Gourc,et al.  Towards a multi-dimensional project Performance Measurement System , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Berna Haktanırlar Ulutaş,et al.  Determination of the appropriate energy policy for Turkey , 2005 .

[14]  Mahesh S. Raisinghani,et al.  Strategic e-Business Decision Analysis Using the Analytic Network Process , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[15]  Raúl Rodríguez Rodríguez,et al.  Performance measurement system for enterprise networks , 2007 .

[16]  D. Lambert,et al.  Fundamentals of Logistics Management , 1998 .

[17]  조남욱 전자/제조업의 Collaboration 전략 , 2003 .

[18]  Kepa Mendibil,et al.  Measuring and managing performance in extended enterprises , 2005 .

[19]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  An Analytic Network Process Model for Financial-Crisis Forecasting , 2004 .

[20]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  Development of a balanced scorecard , 2006 .

[21]  Ming-Chang Lee A Method of Performance Evaluation by Using the Analytic Network Process and Balanced Score Car , 2007 .

[22]  Ming-Chang Lee,et al.  A Method of Performance Evaluation by Using the Analytic Network Process and Balanced Score Car , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Convergence Information Technology (ICCIT 2007).

[23]  Metin Dagdeviren,et al.  Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  Pj Smoot Coming Up Short on Nonfinancial Performance Measurement , 2004 .

[25]  Heng Li,et al.  Application of ANP in process models: An example of strategic partnering , 2007 .

[26]  Maria Jose Verdecho,et al.  Business process interoperability and collaborative performance measurement , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[27]  Mónica García-Melón,et al.  Valuation of urban industrial land: An analytic network process approach , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[29]  Rong-Hwa Huang,et al.  Manufacturing evaluation system based on AHP/ANP approach for wafer fabricating industry , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[30]  Raúl Rodríguez-Rodríguez,et al.  Foundations for collaborative performance measurement , 2009 .

[31]  Byunghak Leem,et al.  Modeling the Metrics for Measuring the Performance on Logistics Centers by BSC and ANP in Korean Context , 2007, PICMET '07 - 2007 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[32]  L. C. Leung,et al.  Implementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process & the analytic network process , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[33]  Alain Abran,et al.  A multidimensional performance model for consolidating balanced scorecards , 2003 .

[34]  Umut Rifat Tuzkaya,et al.  A fuzzy analytic network process based approach to transportation-mode selection between Turkey and Germany: A case study , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[35]  T. Saaty,et al.  Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgements , 1983 .

[36]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Dependence and Feedback , 2001 .

[37]  Yufei Yuan,et al.  Supply chain collaboration alternatives: understanding the expected costs and benefits , 2002, Internet Res..

[38]  Felix T.S. Chan,et al.  Feasibility of performance measurement system for supply chain: a process‐based approach and measures , 2003 .

[39]  Ashish Agarwal,et al.  Analyzing alternatives for improvement in supply chain performance , 2002 .

[40]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Quantitative models for performance measurement systems—alternate considerations , 2003 .

[41]  Sora Lee,et al.  Selection of technology acquisition mode using the analytic network process , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[42]  Uk Jung,et al.  An ANP approach for R&D project evaluation based on interdependencies between research objectives and evaluation criteria , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[43]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  A strategic model for agile virtual enterprise partner selection , 2007 .

[44]  She-I Chang,et al.  Successful implementation of collaborative product commerce: An organizational fit perspective , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[45]  Peter C. Brewer,et al.  USING THE BALANCED SCORECARD TO MEASURE SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE. , 2000 .