Test analysis of a scalable UAV conflict management framework

This study elaborates the conflict management framework of unmanned aerial vehicles, focusing on the identification of the spatiotemporal interdependencies between them, with consideration of the future scalability problems in highly dense traffic scenarios. The paper first tries to justify the applied separation criteria among small cooperative unmanned aerial vehicles based on their performance characteristics and the planned missions’ type. The adopted criteria, obtained from the simulations of 160 missions, present a testing asset, referring to a current lack of the spatiotemporal requirements and a need for extending the research in this area to provide a more rapid integration of these vehicles into the civil controlled airspace. The paper then elaborates the computational framework for the conflict detection and resolution function and operational metrics for causal identification of the spatiotemporal interdependencies between two or more cooperative vehicles. The vehicles are considered as a conflict mission system that strives to achieve an efficient solution by applying certain maneuvering measures, before a loss of separation occurs. The operational trials of five local, short-range missions, supported by the simulation scenario, demonstrate the potential for a time-based complexity analysis in the conflict resolution processes with less demanding and more efficient coordinated maneuvers. The results show that those maneuvers would not induce any new conflicts and disrupt the cooperative mission system when the spatial capacity only might not be favorable in provision of the avoidance maneuvers within an available airspace.

[1]  Miquel Angel Piera Eroles,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Conflict-Free Resolutions for the Airborne Cluster–Ecosystem , 2018 .

[2]  Peter Brooker,et al.  Introducing Unmanned Aircraft Systems into a High Reliability ATC System , 2013, Journal of Navigation.

[3]  Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Agent-based social simulation: dealing with complexity , 2005 .

[4]  Yannick Jestin,et al.  An introduction to ACAS Xu and the challenges ahead , 2016, 2016 IEEE/AIAA 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).

[5]  Joost Ellerbroek,et al.  Safety Assessment of a UAV CD&R System in High Density Airspace Using Monte Carlo Simulations , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  Lennaert Speijker,et al.  Framework for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Safety Risk Management , 2011 .

[7]  Eric Johnson,et al.  Small unmanned aircraft system (sUAS) categorization framework for low altitude traffic services , 2017, 2017 IEEE/AIAA 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).

[8]  Marcus Johnson,et al.  Unmanned Aircraft System Traffic Management (UTM) Concept of Operations , 2016 .

[9]  Joost Ellerbroek,et al.  Analysis of Airspace Structure and Capacity for Decentralized Separation Using Fast-Time Simulations , 2017 .

[10]  Thomas H. Kosel,et al.  Computational techniques for stereographic projection , 1984 .

[11]  Alessandro Gardi,et al.  A Unified Analytical Framework for Aircraft Separation Assurance and UAS Sense-and-Avoid , 2018, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[12]  Andrew D. Zeitlin Standards and Certification of a UAS Sense and Avoid Capability , 2014 .

[13]  Roy Kalawsky,et al.  Integration of Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) in non-segregated airspace: A complex system of systems problem , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Systems Conference.

[14]  John Collura,et al.  Unmanned Aircraft System traffic management: Concept of operation and system architecture , 2016 .

[15]  João Batista Camargo,et al.  Guidelines for the Integration of Autonomous UAS into the Global ATM , 2014, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[16]  Amy R. Pritchett,et al.  Hybrid agent-based simulation for analyzing the National Airspace System , 2001, Proceeding of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference (Cat. No.01CH37304).

[17]  Richard S. Stansbury,et al.  A Survey of UAS Technologies for Command, Control, and Communication (C3) , 2009, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[18]  Eric R. Mueller,et al.  Characteristics of a Well Clear Definition and Alerting Criteria for Encounters between UAS and Manned Aircraft in Class E Airspace , 2015 .

[19]  Joost Ellerbroek,et al.  Taxonomy of Conflict Detection and Resolution Approaches for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in an Integrated Airspace , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[20]  Lisa Fern,et al.  The Impact of Integrated Maneuver Guidance Information on UAS Pilots Performing the Detect and Avoid Task , 2015 .

[21]  Munoz Cesar,et al.  Tactical conflict detection and resolution in a 3-d airspace , 2001 .

[22]  César Muñoz,et al.  Characterizing the Effects of a Vertical Time Threshold for a Class of Well-Clear Definitions , 2015 .

[23]  Jérôme Morio,et al.  Estimating separation distance loss probability between aircraft in uncontrolled airspace in simulation , 2012 .

[24]  Miquel Angel Piera Eroles,et al.  Surrounding traffic complexity analysis for efficient and stable conflict resolution , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[25]  Octavian Thor Pleter,et al.  Objective Function for 4D Trajectory Optimization in Trajectory Based Operations , 2009 .

[26]  John McDermid,et al.  On the Validation of a UAV Collision Avoidance System Developed by Model-Based Optimization: Challenges and a Tentative Partial Solution , 2016, 2016 46th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshop (DSN-W).

[27]  Vincent G. Ambrosia,et al.  Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Remote Sensing and Scientific Research: Classification and Considerations of Use , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[28]  Pradeep Mitra Ecspe,et al.  REPORT NO , 2001 .