Valuing water quality in urban watersheds: A comparative analysis of Johnson Creek, Oregon, and Burnt Bridge Creek, Washington

This study uses the hedonic price method to investigate the effect of five water quality parameters on the sale price of single-family residential properties in two urbanized watersheds in the Portland, Oregon-Vancouver, Washington metropolitan area. Water quality parameters include E. coli or fecal coliform, which can affect human health, decrease water clarity and generate foul odors; pH, dissolved oxygen, and stream temperature, which can impact fish and wildlife populations; and total suspended solids, which can affect water clarity, aquatic life, and aesthetics. Properties within ¼ mile, ½, mile, one mile, or more than one mile from Johnson Creek are estimated to experience an increase in sale price of 13.71%, 7.05%, 8.18%, and 3.12%, respectively, from a one mg/L increase in dissolved oxygen levels during the dry season (May–October). Estimates for a 100 count per 100 mL increase in E. coli during the dry season are −2.81% for properties within ¼ mile of Johnson Creek, −0.86% (½ mile), −1.19% (one mile), and −0.71% (greater than one mile). Results for properties in Burnt Bridge Creek include a significantly positive effect for a one mg/L increase in dissolved oxygen levels during the dry season for properties within ½ mile (4.49%), one mile (2.95%), or greater than one mile from the creek (3.17%). Results for other water quality parameters in Burnt Bridge Creek are generally consistent with a priori expectations. Restoration efforts underway in both study areas might be cost justified based on their estimated effect on property sale prices.

[1]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  Objective versus Subjective Measures of Water Clarity in Hedonic Property Value Models , 2001, Land Economics.

[2]  J. Milon,et al.  The Spatial Extent of Water Quality Benefits in Urban Housing Markets , 2011, Land Economics.

[3]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Spatial Dependence in Hedonic Property Models: Do Different Corrections For Spatial Dependence Result in Economically Significant Differences in Estimated Implicit Prices? , 2008 .

[4]  N. Bockstael,et al.  EVIDENCE OF THE EFFECTS OF WATER QUALITY ON RESIDENTIAL LAND PRICES , 2000 .

[5]  Heejun Chang,et al.  Effects of land cover, topography, and built structure on seasonal water quality at multiple spatial scales. , 2012, Journal of hazardous materials.

[6]  J. Yeakley Water Quality in Pacific Northwest Urban and Urbanizing Aquatic Ecosystems , 2014 .

[7]  Heejun Chang,et al.  Multi-scale analysis of oxygen demand trends in an urbanizing Oregon watershed, USA. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  Douglas M. Johnston,et al.  Downstream economic benefits from storm-water management , 2004 .

[9]  Using Hedonic Modeling to Value AMD Remediation in the Cheat River Watershed , 2009 .

[10]  P. Joan Poor,et al.  Exploring the hedonic value of ambient water quality: A local watershed-based study , 2007 .

[11]  Noelwah R. Netusil,et al.  Relationships between environmental governance and water quality in a growing metropolitan area of the Pacific Northwest, USA , 2014 .

[12]  K. Boyle,et al.  An Hedonic Analysis of the Effects of Lake Water Clarity on New Hampshire Lakefront Properties , 2002, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[13]  Heejun Chang,et al.  Monitoring the channel process of a stream restoration project in an urbanizing watershed: a case study of Kelley Creek, Oregon, USA , 2008 .

[14]  K. Boyle,et al.  Does the Measurement of Environmental Quality Affect Implicit Prices Estimated from Hedonic Models , 2000 .

[15]  Christopher F. Parmeter,et al.  Which hedonic models can we trust to recover the marginal willingness to pay for environmental amenities , 2010 .

[16]  Okmyung Bin,et al.  The Impact of Technical and Non-technical Measures of Water Quality on Coastal Waterfront Property Values in South Florida , 2013, Marine Resource Economics.

[17]  Thomas C. Brown,et al.  A primer on nonmarket valuation , 2003 .

[18]  M. Cropper,et al.  On the Choice of Functional Form for Hedonic Price Functions , 1988 .

[19]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Under the hood , 2002 .

[20]  K. Larson,et al.  An Analysis of the Relationship between Residents' Proximity to Water and Attitudes about Resource Protection* , 2007 .

[21]  Jeffrey E. Zabel,et al.  What Can We Learn from Hedonic Models When Housing Markets Are Dominated by Foreclosures , 2013 .

[22]  Heejun Chang,et al.  Comparative streamflow characteristics in urbanizing basins in the Portland Metropolitan Area, Oregon, USA , 2007 .

[23]  Laura O. Taylor,et al.  Estimating the Demand for Protecting Freshwater Lakes from Eutrophication , 1999 .

[24]  Noelwah R. Netusil,et al.  Valuing vegetation in an urban watershed , 2011 .

[25]  Ted Hart,et al.  Valuing green infrastructure in Portland, Oregon , 2014 .

[26]  D. Epp,et al.  The Effect of Water Quality on Rural Nonfarm Residential Property Values , 1979 .

[27]  R. Roberts,et al.  Negative Externalities on Property Values Resulting from Water Impairment: The Case of the Pigeon River Watershed , 2011 .

[28]  J. Meyer,et al.  Streams in the Urban Landscape , 2001 .

[29]  D. G. Smith,et al.  TURBIDITY SUSPENI)ED SEDIMENT, AND WATER CLARITY: A REVIEW 1 , 2001 .

[30]  R. W. Hoyer,et al.  Development of Future Land Cover Change Scenarios in the Metropolitan Fringe, Oregon, U.S., with Stakeholder Involvement , 2014 .

[31]  Joseph S. Meyer,et al.  Structural changes in gills of Lost River suckers exposed to elevated pH and ammonia concentrations. , 2003, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP.