Didactical designs for students’ proportional reasoning: an “open approach” lesson and a “fundamental situation”

In this paper, we analyze and compare two didactical designs for introducing primary school pupils to proportional reasoning in the context of plane polygons. One of them is well-documented in the literature; the other one is based on our own data and is accordingly presented and discussed in more detail in this paper. The two designs come from different cultural and intellectual environments: lesson study in Japan (implicitly based on the “open approach method”) and “didactical engineering” in France (based on the theory of didactical situations). The general aim of our paper is to compare these two environments and their approaches to didactical design, basing our discussion on the concrete designs mentioned above. Clear differences among them are presented, while we also identify links which hold potential for integrating research and practice.

[1]  Heinz Steinbring.  L'indépendance stochastique , 1986 .

[2]  Clea Fernandez,et al.  Lesson Study: A Japanese Approach To Improving Mathematics Teaching and Learning , 2004 .

[3]  Shigeru Shimada,et al.  The Open-Ended Approach: A New Proposal for Teaching Mathematics , 1997 .

[4]  Euclid.  Euclid's Elements , 2002 .

[5]  J. Stigler,et al.  The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom , 1999 .

[6]  Magali Hersant,et al.  Characterization of an Ordinary Teaching Practice with the Help of the Theory of Didactic Situations , 2005 .

[7]  Sarah B. Berenson,et al.  A comparison of ratios and fractions and their roles as tools in proportional reasoning , 2003 .

[8]  Masami Isoda,et al.  Japanese lesson study in mathematics: Its impact, diversity and potential for educational improvement , 2007 .

[9]  M. Isoda.  Where did Lesson Study Begin, and How Far Has It Come? , 2007 .

[10]  Yoshinori Shimizu.  Studying sample lessons rather than one excellent lesson: A Japanese perspective on the TIMSS videotape classroom study , 1999 .

[11]  Robert Adjiage,et al.  An Experiment in Teaching Ratio and Proportion , 2007 .

[12]  Guy Brousseau,et al.  Rationnels et décimaux dans la scolarité obligatoire , 1987 .

[13]  R. Douady.  Jeux de cadres et dialectique outil-objet , 2009 .

[14]  Ferdinando Arzarello,et al.  Comparing, combining, coordinating-networking strategies for connecting theoretical approaches Editorial for ZDM-issue 39 (2008) 2 , 2008 .

[15]  M. Artigue.  Didactical design in mathematics education , 2009 .

[16]  Marilyn E. Strutchens,et al.  The Challenge of Linking Research and Practice. , 2006 .

[17]  Editorial: Action Research and Mathematics Teacher Education , 2006 .

[18]  Steven Pulos,et al.  Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature , 1985 .

[19]  Nobuhiko Nohda,et al.  Teaching by Open-Approach Method in Japanese Mathematics Classroom. , 2000 .

[20]  K. Hino.  Toward the problem-centered classroom: trends in mathematical problem solving in Japan , 2007 .

[21]  Barbara J. Dougherty,et al.  Mathematics Education Across Cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education , 2020 .

[22]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  The Predominance of the Linear Model in Secondary School Students' Solutions of Word Problems Involving Length and Area of Similar Plane Figures , 1998 .

[23]  G. Brousseau.  Theory of didactical situations in mathematics , 1997 .