Design and Climate-Responsiveness Performance Evaluation of an Integrated Envelope for Modular Prefabricated Buildings

Modular prefabricated buildings effectively improve the efficiency and quality of building design and construction and represent an important trend in the development of building industrialization. However, there are still many deficiencies in the design and technology of existing systems, especially in terms of the integration of architectural performance defects that cannot respond to occupants’ comfort, flexibility, and energy-saving requirements throughout the building’s life cycle. This research takes modular prefabricated steel structural systems as its research object and sets the detailed design of an integrated modular envelope system as the core content. First, the researcher chose two types of thermal insulation materials, high insulation panels and aerogel blankets, in order to study the construction details of integrated building envelopes for modular prefabricated buildings. Focusing on the weakest heat point, the thermal bridge at the modular connection point, this work used construction design and research to build an experimental building and full-scale model; the goal was to explore and verify the feasibility of the climate-responsive construction technique called “reverse install.” Second, as a response to climate change, building facades were dynamically adjusted by employing different modular building envelope units such as sunshades, preheaters, ventilation, air filtration, pest control, and other functional requirements in order to improve the building’s climate adaptability. Finally, based on the above structural design and research, this study verified the actual measurements and simulation, as well as the sustainability performance of the structure during the operational phase, and provided feedback on the design. The results highlight the environmental performance of each construction detail and optimized possibilities for an integrated envelope design for modular prefabricated buildings during both the design and renovation phases.

[1]  Jonathan Teicher,et al.  Conversations With Form: A Workbook for Students of Architecture , 2014 .

[2]  Lei Dong,et al.  Integration of Sustainability in Net-zero House: Experiences in Solar Decathlon China☆ , 2014 .

[3]  Olufolahan Oduyemi,et al.  Building performance modelling for sustainable building design , 2016 .

[4]  Targo Kalamees,et al.  nZEB Renovation with Prefabricated Modular Panels , 2017 .

[5]  Arild Gustavsen,et al.  Vacuum insulation panels for building applications: A review and beyond , 2010 .

[6]  Zhihua Chen,et al.  Experimental study of an innovative modular steel building connection , 2017 .

[7]  Junjie Li,et al.  Experimental verification and pair-group analysis study of passive space design strategies , 2015 .

[8]  Robert F. Boehm,et al.  Passive building energy savings: A review of building envelope components , 2011 .

[9]  Paulo Santos,et al.  Energy efficiency and thermal performance of lightweight steel-framed (LSF) construction: A review , 2017 .

[10]  Hatice Sözer,et al.  Improving energy efficiency through the design of the building envelope , 2010 .

[11]  Fei Xue,et al.  Double-skin façade optimization design for different climate zones in China , 2017 .

[12]  H. Hwang,et al.  Fabrication of silica aerogel composite blankets from an aqueous silica aerogel slurry , 2018 .

[13]  Jin-Hee Song,et al.  Evaluation of alternatives for reducing thermal bridges in metal panel curtain wall systems , 2016 .

[14]  Vincenzo Antonucci,et al.  Life cycle energy performances of a Net Zero Energy prefabricated building in Sicily , 2017 .

[15]  Márcia Elisa Soares Echeveste,et al.  The role of modularity in sustainable design: A systematic review , 2018 .

[16]  Junjie Li,et al.  Multi-criteria approach to passive space design in buildings: Impact of courtyard spaces on public buildings in cold climates , 2015 .

[17]  Wei Pan,et al.  Reducing building life cycle carbon emissions through prefabrication: Evidence from and gaps in empirical studies , 2018 .

[18]  Song Yeha.  Indoor Comfort and Energy Saving Building Performance Created by Envelope Materials , 2014 .

[19]  Umberto Berardi,et al.  Aerogel-enhanced systems for building energy retrofits: insights from a case study , 2018 .

[20]  I. Smirnova,et al.  Aerogel production: Current status, research directions, and future opportunities , 2017 .

[21]  Yan Wang,et al.  An experimental study on the indoor thermal environment in prefabricated houses in the subtropics , 2016 .

[22]  Anna Laura Pisello,et al.  Environmental impact of industrial prefabricated buildings: Carbon and Energy Footprint analysis based on an LCA approach. , 2014 .

[23]  Zheng Li,et al.  Seismic performance assessment of steel frame infilled with prefabricated wood shear walls , 2018 .

[24]  Konstantinos Salonitis.  Modular design for increasing assembly automation , 2014 .

[25]  Fabian Ochs,et al.  Prefabricated Timber Frame Façade with Integrated Active Components for Minimal Invasive Renovations , 2015 .

[26]  Luca Caneparo.  Digital Fabrication in Architecture, Engineering and Construction , 2013 .

[27]  Lin Zhengha.  CLIMATE RESPONSIVE MODULAR BUILDING SKIN DESIGN STRATEGY:A CASE STUDY OF THE-STUDIO , 2015 .

[28]  T. Konstantinou,et al.  An approach to integrate energy efficiency upgrade into refurbishment design process, applied in two case-study buildings in Northern European climate , 2013 .