Practice guidelines and standards: an overview.

Organized medicine, insurance companies, regulators, and the peer review organizations are all interested in practice guidelines. Recently, the U.S. Congress established the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, which is charged with overseeing the development of practice guidelines. If properly developed, disseminated, and used, practice guidelines should reduce the incidence of inappropriate care and help control costs. Although guidelines have been used by physicians for years, guidelines now being developed should be more comprehensive, specific, exhaustive, and--on the basis of the best scientific evidence of effectiveness and expert opinion--more effectively discriminate between useful and useless care. Practice guidelines can improve the quality of care when used voluntarily by physicians in practice, when used as standards for quality monitoring and assurance programs, and when used as the basis for reimbursement for services. All interested parties should share responsibilities for the research, development, and production of appropriateness criteria, their translation into guidelines and standards, and the dissemination and maintenance of the guidelines, including evaluation, revision, and updating.

[1]  H. King,et al.  EPIPODOPHYLLOTOXIN IN MYCOSIS FUNGOIDES , 1975, The Lancet.

[2]  R H Brook,et al.  Variations in the use of medical and surgical services by the Medicare population. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  J. Dorsey Use of diagnostic resources in health maintenance organizations and fee-for-service practice settings. , 1983, Archives of internal medicine.

[4]  K. Kahn,et al.  Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures. , 1986, American journal of public health.

[5]  David J. Feild Guidelines for coronary angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures (Subcommittee on coronary angiography) , 1987 .

[6]  R. Brook,et al.  How coronary angiography is used. Clinical determinants of appropriateness. , 1987, JAMA.

[7]  C. Lewis,et al.  Variations in the incidence of surgery. , 1969, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  D. Kanouse,et al.  The appropriateness of performing coronary artery bypass surgery. , 1988, JAMA.

[9]  Robert H. Brook,et al.  How Coronary Angiography Is Used , 1987 .

[10]  A L Greer,et al.  The two cultures of biomedicine: can there be consensus? , 1987, JAMA.

[11]  Chalmers Tc,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical medicine. , 1988 .

[12]  A. Gittelsohn,et al.  Variations in medical care among small areas. , 1982, Scientific American.

[13]  N. Lurie,et al.  Termination from Medi-Cal--does it affect health? , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  R H Brook,et al.  Does inappropriate use explain small-area variations in the use of health care services? , 1990, JAMA.

[15]  D. Brahams Monitoring Equipment and Anaesthetic Failures , 1989, The Lancet.

[16]  R. Brook,et al.  The appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  K L Coltin,et al.  Feedback reduces test use in a health maintenance organization. , 1986, JAMA.

[18]  P. Griner Use of laboratory tests in a teaching hospital: long-term trends: reductions in use and relative cost. , 1979, Annals of internal medicine.

[19]  A L Greer,et al.  The State of the Art Versus the State of the Science: The Diffusion of New Medical Technologies into Practice , 1988, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[20]  K. Kahn,et al.  The use and misuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. , 1988, Annals of internal medicine.

[21]  N Gleicher,et al.  A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  J. Eisenberg,et al.  An educational program to modify laboratory use by house staff. , 1977, Journal of medical education.

[23]  S. Schroeder Strategies for Reducing Medical Costs by Changing Physicians' Behavior: Efficacy and Impact on Quality of Care , 1987, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[24]  N. Roos,et al.  Use of claims data systems to evaluate health care outcomes. Mortality and reoperation following prostatectomy. , 1987, JAMA.

[25]  J. Wennberg,et al.  Dealing with medical practice variations: a proposal for action. , 1984, Health affairs.

[26]  D M Eddy,et al.  Variations in physician practice: the role of uncertainty. , 1984, Health affairs.

[27]  A. Gittelsohn,et al.  Small Area Variations in Health Care Delivery , 1973, Science.

[28]  R H Brook,et al.  Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services? A study of three procedures. , 1987, JAMA.

[29]  A. Greenspon,et al.  Incidence of unwarranted implantation of permanent cardiac pacemakers in a large medical population. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  D M Eddy,et al.  Clinical policies and the quality of clinical practice. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  T. Graboys,et al.  Results of a second-opinion program for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 1987, JAMA.