Multi-Criteria Stochastic Selection of Electric Vehicles for the Sustainable Development of Local Government and State Administration Units in Poland

Increasing the popularity of electric vehicles is one way of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and making the economy more sustainable. In Poland, the use of electric vehicles is to be increased by the adoption of the Act on Electromobility and Alternative Fuels. This Act obliges local government units and state administration to expand the electric vehicle fleet. The expansion of the fleet should be carried out on a planned basis, based on rational decisions supported by economic analyses. Therefore, the aim of this article is to provide a recommendation of an electric vehicle that meets the needs of local and state administration to the greatest extent possible. The aim has been achieved using the multi-criteria decision analysis method called PROSA-C (PROMETHEE for Sustainability Assessment—Criteria) combined with the Monte Carlo method. The PROSA-C method allows promoting more sustainable vehicles with high technical, economic, environmental and social parameters. The Monte Carlo method, on the other hand, is a stochastic simulation tool that allows for taking into account the uncertainty of parameters describing vehicles. As a result of the research, the most and least attractive vehicles were identified from the perspective of the needs of local government units and state administration. Moreover, the conducted research allowed confirming the effectiveness and usefulness of the research methodology proposed in the article and the procedural approach combining the PROSA-C and Monte Carlo methods.

[1]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  Applying Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to the Life-Cycle Assessment of vehicles , 2015 .

[2]  Jicheng Liu,et al.  Risk evaluation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure public-private partnership projects in China using fuzzy TOPSIS , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[3]  Paweł Ziemba,et al.  A Consensus Measure of Expert Judgment in the Fuzzy TOPSIS Method , 2020, Symmetry.

[4]  Isabella Maria Lami,et al.  Supporting Resilient Urban Planning through Walkability Assessment , 2020, Sustainability.

[5]  Dalia Streimikiene,et al.  Multicriteria Approach towards the Sustainable Selection of a Teahouse Location with Sensitivity Analysis , 2018, Sustainability.

[6]  Sigal Kaplan,et al.  COPE-SMARTER – A decision support system for analysing the challenges, opportunities and policy initiatives: A case study of electric commercial vehicles market diffusion in Denmark , 2016 .

[7]  Yeonbae Kim,et al.  Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle Use , 2020, Sustainability.

[8]  Pawel Ziemba,et al.  NEAT F-PROMETHEE - A new fuzzy multiple criteria decision making method based on the adjustment of mapping trapezoidal fuzzy numbers , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Jarosław Wątróbski,et al.  Using the PROSA Method in Offshore Wind Farm Location Problems , 2017 .

[10]  Artur Karczmarczyk,et al.  Using the COMET Method in the Sustainable City Transport Problem: an Empirical Study of the Electric Powered Cars , 2018, KES.

[11]  Eunil Park,et al.  Understanding the Emergence and Social Acceptance of Electric Vehicles as Next-Generation Models for the Automobile Industry , 2018 .

[12]  Jicheng Liu,et al.  A VIKOR-based approach for assessing the service performance of electric vehicle sharing programs: A case study in Beijing , 2017 .

[13]  Paweł Ziemba,et al.  Inter-Criteria Dependencies-Based Decision Support in the Sustainable wind Energy Management , 2019, Energies.

[14]  K. F. Darkwah,et al.  Logistic preference function for preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) decision analysis , 2012 .

[15]  Tommi Tervonen,et al.  Implementing stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Jarosław Wątróbski,et al.  Multi-Criteria Analysis of Electric Vans for City Logistics , 2017 .

[17]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems , 1998 .

[18]  Gregory M Peters,et al.  Aggregating sustainability indicators: beyond the weighted sum. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[19]  Adel Guitouni,et al.  Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  DEPENDENCE OF MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION RESULT ON CHOICE OF PREFERENCE FUNCTIONS AND THEIR PARAMETERS , 2010 .

[21]  B. Davidsdottir,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis of fiscal policies promoting the adoption of electric vehicles , 2017 .

[22]  Masoud Nasiri,et al.  An appropriate multiple criteria decision making method for solving electricity planning problems, addressing sustainability issue , 2011 .

[23]  Bernd Resch,et al.  Defining and assessing walkability: a concept for an integrated approach using surveys, biosensors and geospatial analysis , 2019, Urban Development Issues.

[24]  Jun Wang,et al.  Combining an Extended SMAA-2 Method with Integer Linear Programming for Task Assignment of Multi-UCAV under Multiple Uncertainties , 2018, Symmetry.

[25]  Artur Karczmarczyk,et al.  Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection , 2018, Omega.

[26]  Jaroslaw Becker,et al.  Analysis of the Digital Divide Using Fuzzy Forecasting , 2019, Symmetry.

[27]  Timothy J. Havranek,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis for environmental remediation: Benefits, challenges, and recommended practices , 2019, Remediation Journal.

[28]  Jianxue Chai,et al.  Risk Identification and Analysis for PPP Projects of Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Based on 2-Tuple and the DEMATEL Model , 2019, World Electric Vehicle Journal.

[29]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Incorporating uncertainty in the PROMETHEE MCDA method , 2003 .

[30]  Wei Li,et al.  Multi-Objective Optimal Charging Control of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles in Power Distribution Systems , 2019, Energies.

[31]  Eren Özceylan,et al.  Optimal siting of electric vehicle charging stations: A GIS-based fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis , 2018, Energy.

[32]  Paweł Ziemba,et al.  Towards Strong Sustainability Management—A Generalized PROSA Method , 2019, Sustainability.

[33]  Yanbing Ju,et al.  Study of site selection of electric vehicle charging station based on extended GRP method under picture fuzzy environment , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[34]  Francesca Abastante,et al.  A new parsimonious AHP methodology: Assigning priorities to many objects by comparing pairwise few reference objects , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[35]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Electric Vehicles as Flexibility Management Strategy for the Electricity System—A Comparison between Different Regions of Europe , 2019, Energies.

[36]  Marco Cinelli,et al.  Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment , 2014 .

[37]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  Optimization and Multicriteria Evaluation of Carbon-neutral Technologies for District Heating , 2019, Energies.