Highly Sensitive and Specific Multiplex Antibody Assays To Quantify Immunoglobulins M, A, and G against SARS-CoV-2 Antigens

Reliable serological tests are required to determine the prevalence of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and to characterize immunity to the disease in order to address key knowledge gaps in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Quantitative suspension array technology (qSAT) assays based on the xMAP Luminex platform overcome the limitations of rapid diagnostic tests and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) with their higher precision, dynamic range, throughput, miniaturization, cost-efficiency, and multiplexing capacity. ABSTRACT Reliable serological tests are required to determine the prevalence of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and to characterize immunity to the disease in order to address key knowledge gaps in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Quantitative suspension array technology (qSAT) assays based on the xMAP Luminex platform overcome the limitations of rapid diagnostic tests and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) with their higher precision, dynamic range, throughput, miniaturization, cost-efficiency, and multiplexing capacity. We developed three qSAT assays for IgM, IgA, and IgG against a panel of eight SARS-CoV-2 antigens, including spike protein (S), nucleocapsid protein (N), and membrane protein (M) constructs. The assays were optimized to minimize the processing time and maximize the signal-to-noise ratio. We evaluated their performances using 128 prepandemic plasma samples (negative controls) and 104 plasma samples from individuals with SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis (positive controls), of whom 5 were asymptomatic, 51 had mild symptoms, and 48 were hospitalized. Preexisting IgG antibodies recognizing N, M, and S proteins were detected in negative controls, which is suggestive of cross-reactivity to common-cold coronaviruses. The best-performing antibody/antigen signatures had specificities of 100% and sensitivities of 95.78% at ≥14 days and 95.65% at ≥21 days since the onset of symptoms, with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.977 and 0.999, respectively. Combining multiple markers as assessed by qSAT assays has the highest efficiency, breadth, and versatility to accurately detect low-level antibody responses for obtaining reliable data on the prevalence of exposure to novel pathogens in a population. Our assays will allow gaining insights into antibody correlates of immunity and their kinetics, required for vaccine development to combat the COVID-19 pandemic.

[1]  L. Schroeder,et al.  Differences in Performance Characteristics Among Four High-Throughput Assays for the Detection of Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 Using a Common Set of Patient Samples , 2020, American journal of clinical pathology.

[2]  A. Rabello,et al.  Diagnostic performance of commercially available COVID-19 serology tests in Brazil , 2020, International Journal of Infectious Diseases.

[3]  Melis N. Anahtar,et al.  Evaluation of Three Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assays and Their Performance in Two-Test Algorithms , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[4]  N. Hacohen,et al.  Viral epitope profiling of COVID-19 patients reveals cross-reactivity and correlates of severity , 2020, Science.

[5]  G. Rodger,et al.  Performance characteristics of five immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2: a head-to-head benchmark comparison , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[6]  M. Rodgers,et al.  A comparative evaluation between the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 IgG/IgM rapid test device and Abbott Architect™ SARS CoV-2 IgG assay , 2020, Journal of Clinical Virology.

[7]  M. Koopmans,et al.  SARS-CoV-2–Specific Antibody Detection for Seroepidemiology: A Multiplex Analysis Approach Accounting for Accurate Seroprevalence , 2020, medRxiv.

[8]  L. Guddat,et al.  Structural Basis for RNA Replication by the SARS-CoV-2 Polymerase , 2020, Cell.

[9]  J. Greenbaum,et al.  Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals , 2020, Cell.

[10]  Gagan Mathur,et al.  Antibody Testing For Covid-19 , 2020, American journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  P. Whiting,et al.  Interpreting a covid-19 test result , 2020, BMJ.

[12]  A. Meola,et al.  Serological signatures of SARS-CoV-2 infection: Implications for antibody-based diagnostics , 2020, medRxiv.

[13]  J. Hecht,et al.  Seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among health care workers in a large Spanish reference hospital , 2020, Nature Communications.

[14]  O. Tsang,et al.  Beyond the Spike: identification of viral targets of the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients , 2020, medRxiv.

[15]  Lei Liu,et al.  Profile of IgG and IgM antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) , 2020, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[16]  Daniel M Altmann,et al.  What policy makers need to know about COVID-19 protective immunity , 2020, The Lancet.

[17]  R. Davey,et al.  Detection of Nucleocapsid Antibody to SARS-CoV-2 is More Sensitive than Antibody to Spike Protein in COVID-19 Patients , 2020, medRxiv.

[18]  C. Hillyer,et al.  Neutralizing Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and Other Human Coronaviruses , 2020, Trends in Immunology.

[19]  U. Reimer,et al.  Presence of SARS-CoV-2 reactive T cells in COVID-19 patients and healthy donors , 2020, medRxiv.

[20]  S. Hegde,et al.  The important role of serology for COVID-19 control , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[21]  Yan-ling Ma,et al.  Antibody Detection and Dynamic Characteristics in Patients with COVID-19 , 2020, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[22]  Michael Libman,et al.  Diagnostic Testing for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome–Related Coronavirus-2 , 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  K. Yuen,et al.  Structural and Functional Basis of SARS-CoV-2 Entry by Using Human ACE2 , 2020, Cell.

[24]  C. Hillyer,et al.  Neutralizing Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and Other Human Coronaviruses , 2020, Trends in Immunology.

[25]  M. Day Covid-19: four fifths of cases are asymptomatic, China figures indicate , 2020, BMJ.

[26]  The Cell Editorial Team Embracing the Landscape of Therapeutics , 2020, Cell.

[27]  C. Whittaker,et al.  Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[28]  A. Buisman,et al.  Immune surveillance for vaccine-preventable diseases , 2020, Expert review of vaccines.

[29]  P. Felgner,et al.  Analysis of Serologic Cross-Reactivity Between Common Human Coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2 Using Coronavirus Antigen Microarray , 2020, bioRxiv.

[30]  O. Tsang,et al.  Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[31]  S. Zhang,et al.  The index case of SARS-CoV-2 in Scotland , 2020, Journal of Infection.

[32]  Qi Jin,et al.  Profiling Early Humoral Response to Diagnose Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) , 2020, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[33]  Y. Yazdanpanah,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody responses in COVID-19 patients , 2020, medRxiv.

[34]  Pu Liao,et al.  Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients: the perspective application of serological tests in clinical practice , 2020, medRxiv.

[35]  Philip L. Felgner,et al.  A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans , 2020, medRxiv.

[36]  Chuan Qin,et al.  Reinfection could not occur in SARS-CoV-2 infected rhesus macaques , 2020 .

[37]  H. Gao,et al.  Lack of Reinfection in Rhesus Macaques Infected with SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, bioRxiv.

[38]  Lei Liu,et al.  Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients of novel coronavirus disease 2019 , 2020, medRxiv.

[39]  G. Gao,et al.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019 , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  J. Hepojoki,et al.  Immunoassay for serodiagnosis of Zika virus infection based on time-resolved Förster resonance energy transfer , 2019, PloS one.

[41]  Y. Dong,et al.  Analysis of factors affecting the variability of a quantitative suspension bead array assay measuring IgG to multiple Plasmodium antigens , 2018, PloS one.

[42]  Virander S. Chauhan,et al.  Optimization of incubation conditions of Plasmodium falciparum antibody multiplex assays to measure IgG, IgG1–4, IgM and IgE using standard and customized reference pools for sero-epidemiological and vaccine studies , 2018, Malaria Journal.

[43]  J. Campo,et al.  Development of a high-throughput flexible quantitative suspension array assay for IgG against multiple Plasmodium falciparum antigens , 2018, Malaria Journal.

[44]  Joseph J Campo,et al.  Development of quantitative suspension array assays for six immunoglobulin isotypes and subclasses to multiple Plasmodium falciparum antigens. , 2018, Journal of immunological methods.

[45]  N. Bizzaro,et al.  Chemiluminescent immunoassay technology: what does it change in autoantibody detection? , 2017, Autoimmunity Highlights.

[46]  K. M. Koczula,et al.  Lateral flow assays , 2016, Essays in biochemistry.

[47]  Christian Drosten,et al.  Serological assays for emerging coronaviruses: Challenges and pitfalls , 2014, Virus Research.

[48]  Xavier Robin,et al.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[49]  Yan J. Zhang,et al.  Characterization and development of a Luminex(®)-based assay for the detection of human IL-23. , 2010, Bioanalysis.

[50]  F. Plummer,et al.  Neutralizing epitopes of the SARS-CoV S-protein cluster independent of repertoire, antigen structure or mAb technology , 2010, mAbs.

[51]  J. Mendoza,et al.  Development of an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay-Based Test with a Cocktail of Nucleocapsid and Spike Proteins for Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Associated Coronavirus-Specific Antibody , 2008, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.

[52]  Wei Liu,et al.  Two-Year Prospective Study of the Humoral Immune Response of Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , 2006, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[53]  Haiyan Wei,et al.  Profiles of IgG antibodies to nucleocapsid and spike proteins of the SARS-associated coronavirus in SARS patients. , 2005, DNA and cell biology.

[54]  Arul Earnest,et al.  Asymptomatic SARS Coronavirus Infection among Healthcare Workers, Singapore , 2005, Emerging infectious diseases.

[55]  V. Cheng,et al.  Antigenic Cross-Reactivity between Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome—Associated Coronavirus and Human Coronaviruses 229E and OC43 , 2005, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[56]  Runsheng Chen,et al.  Antibody responses to individual proteins of SARS coronavirus and their neutralization activities , 2005, Microbes and Infection.

[57]  G. Tang,et al.  Indian Hedgehog: A Mechanotransduction Mediator in Condylar Cartilage , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[58]  D. Vignali,et al.  Simultaneous quantitation of 15 cytokines using a multiplexed flow cytometric assay. , 1999, Journal of immunological methods.

[59]  D. Tyrrell,et al.  The time course of the immune response to experimental coronavirus infection of man , 1990, Epidemiology and Infection.

[60]  E. Engvall,et al.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Quantitative assay of immunoglobulin G. , 1971, Immunochemistry.

[61]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[62]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[63]  Dr Ferdiye Taner,et al.  The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). , 1976, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.