Application of multistage continuous fermentation for production of fuel alcohol by very-high-gravity fermentation technology

A fermentation system to test the merging of very-high-gravity (VHG) and multistage continuous culture fermentation (MCCF) technologies was constructed and evaluated for fuel ethanol production. Simulated mashes ranging from 15% to 32% w/v glucose were fermented by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the dilution rates were adjusted for each glucose concentration to provide an effluent containing less than 0.3% w/v glucose (greater than 99% consumption of glucose). The MCCF can be operated with glucose concentrations up to 32% w/v, which indicates that the system can successfully operate under VHG conditions. With 32% w/v glucose in the medium reservoir, a maximum of 16.73% v/v ethanol was produced in the MCCF. The introduction of VHG fermentation into continuous culture technology allows an improvement in ethanol productivity while producing ethanol continuously. In comparing the viability of yeast by methylene blue and plate count procedures, the results in this work indicate that the methylene blue procedure may overestimate the proportion of dead cells in the population. Ethanol productivity (Yps) increased from the first to the last fermentor in the sequence at all glucose concentrations used. This indicated that ethanol is more effectively produced in later fermentors in the MCCF, and that the notion of a constant Yps is not a valid assumption for use in mathematical modeling of MCCFs. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology (2001) 27, 87–93.

[1]  E. O'Connor,et al.  Effect of the timing of oxygenation on very high gravity brewing fermentations , 1989 .

[2]  R. Kunkee,et al.  Factors Influencing Sluggish Fermentations of Grape Juice , 1985, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[3]  K. Smart,et al.  Use of methylene violet staining procedures to determine yeast viability and vitality , 1999 .

[4]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Viability of Commercial “Household” Yeast Preparations , 1972 .

[5]  K. C. Thomas,et al.  Fuel alcohol production: effects of free amino nitrogen on fermentation of very-high-gravity wheat mashes , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[6]  J. Pronk,et al.  Effect of Specific Growth Rate on Fermentative Capacity of Baker’s Yeast , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[7]  B. A. Searle,et al.  SUGAR UTILIZATION BY A BREWING YEAST IN RELATION TO THE GROWTH AND MAINTENANCE PHASES OF METABOLISM , 1979 .

[8]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Practical and theoretical considerations in the production of high concentrations of alcohol by fermentation , 1996 .

[9]  C. Wilke,et al.  Process design and economic studies of alternative fermentation methods for the production of ethanol , 1978 .

[10]  R. Tyagi,et al.  Batch and multistage continuous ethanol fermentation of cellulose hydrolysate and optimum design of fermentor by graphical analysis , 1980 .

[11]  Alison M. Jones,et al.  Fuel Alcohol Production: Optimization of Temperature for Efficient Very-High-Gravity Fermentation , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[12]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Urea Hydrogen Peroxide Reduces the Numbers of Lactobacilli, Nourishes Yeast, and Leaves No Residues in the Ethanol Fermentation , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  J. Mckee,et al.  Very high gravity brewing - Laboratory and pilot plant trials , 1992 .

[14]  K. J. Clarke,et al.  Effect of osmotic stress on the ultrastructure and viability of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1986, Journal of general microbiology.

[15]  D. Makanjuola,et al.  Some effects of lactic acid bacteria on laboratory-scale yeast fermentations , 1992 .

[16]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Production of fuel alcohol from wheat by VHG technology , 1993 .

[17]  J. D. Burton,et al.  Membrane Filtration: Survival of Brewing Microbes on the Membrane during Storage at Reduced Humidities1 , 1980 .

[18]  T. Lyons Biotechnology in the feed industry , 1987 .