Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES We examined preoperative clinical and pathologic parameters in men with clinical stage T1c disease who underwent radical prostatectomy and correlated these findings with the pathologic extent of disease in the surgical specimen in an attempt to identify a subset of patients with potentially biologically insignificant tumor who might be followed up without immediate treatment. DESIGN AND PATIENTS A case series of 157 consecutive men who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1c disease compared with 64 similarly treated clinical stage T1a cancers (incidental minimal cancers found on transurethral resection of prostate) and 439 clinical stage T2 (palpable) cancers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Pathologic stage, grade, and margins; tumor volume; and tumor location. RESULTS Sixteen percent of tumors were insignificant (< 0.2 cm3 and confined to the prostate, with a Gleason score < 7); 10% were minimal (0.2 to 0.5 cm3 and confined to the prostate, with a Gleason score < 7); 37% were moderate (> 0.5 cm3 or capsular penetration, with a Gleason score < 7); and 37% were advanced (capsular penetration, with a Gleason score > or = 7 or positive margins, seminal vesicles, or lymph nodes). These findings are intermediate between those found in clinical stage T1a and stage T2 disease. The following parameters were not predictive of tumor extent: age, reason for evaluation, method of detection, and transrectal ultrasound. The best model predicting insignificant tumor was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density less than 0.1 ng/mL per gram and no adverse pathologic findings on needle biopsy, or PSA density of 0.1 to 0.15 ng/mL per gram, with a low- to intermediate-grade cancer smaller than 3 mm found in only one needle biopsy core specimen. The positive predictive value of the model was 95%, with a negative predictive value of 66%. We accurately predicted 73% of cases with insignificant tumor. CONCLUSIONS Eighty-four percent of nonpalpable prostate cancers diagnosed by screening techniques are significant tumors and warrant definitive therapy. However, 16% are insignificant. Serum PSA level, PSA density, and needle biopsy pathologic findings are accurate predictors of tumor extent. It may be reasonable to follow up some patients whose tumors are most likely insignificant with serial PSA measurements and repeated biopsies.

[1]  A. Partin,et al.  Morphometric measurement of tumor volume and per cent of gland involvement as predictors of pathological stage in clinical stage B prostate cancer. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[2]  J. Goméz,et al.  Serum prostate specific antigen as pre-screening test for prostate cancer. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[3]  P. Walsh,et al.  Prognosis of untreated stage A1 prostatic carcinoma: a study of 94 cases with extended followup. , 1986, The Journal of urology.

[4]  T. Stamey,et al.  Histologic differentiation, cancer volume, and pelvic lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the prostate , 1990, Cancer.

[5]  Galina Pizov,et al.  Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy , 1993, Cancer.

[6]  M. Benson,et al.  The use of prostate specific antigen density to enhance the predictive value of intermediate levels of serum prostate specific antigen. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[7]  H C Aldape,et al.  Prostate cancer: comparison of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound for screening. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[8]  J. Epstein,et al.  Can stage A1 tumor extent be predicted by transurethral resection tumor volume, per cent or grade? A study of 64 stage A1 radical prostatectomies with comparison to prostates removed for stages A2 and B disease. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[9]  P. Walsh,et al.  Needle biopsy associated tumor tracking of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[10]  W. Cooner,et al.  Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. , 1990, The Journal of urology.

[11]  J. Oesterling,et al.  Prostate specific antigen: a critical assessment of the most useful tumor marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[12]  A W Partin,et al.  Is tumor volume an independent predictor of progression following radical prostatectomy? A multivariate analysis of 185 clinical stage B adenocarcinomas of the prostate with 5 years of followup. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[13]  J. Trachtenberg,et al.  Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate , 1988 .

[14]  M. Terris,et al.  Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsies. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[15]  P. Walsh,et al.  Evaluation of transrectal ultrasound in the early detection of prostate cancer. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[16]  W. Catalona,et al.  Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  E. Metter,et al.  Longitudinal evaluation of prostate-specific antigen levels in men with and without prostate disease. , 1992, JAMA.

[18]  J. Oesterling,et al.  Prostate specific antigen in the staging of localized prostate cancer: influence of tumor differentiation, tumor volume and benign hyperplasia. , 1990, The Journal of urology.

[19]  W. Whitmore Natural history of low-stage prostatic cancer and the impact of early detection. , 1990, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[20]  J. Oesterling,et al.  Clinical Stage B0 or T1c prostate cancer: nonpalpable disease identified by elevated serum prostate-specific antigen concentration. , 1993, Urology.

[21]  P. Walsh,et al.  Influence of capsular penetration on progression following radical prostatectomy: a study of 196 cases with long-term followup. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[22]  A. Pantuck,et al.  Prostate specific antigen density: a means of distinguishing benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostate cancer. , 1992, The Journal of urology.