How Advances in Imaging Will Affect Precision Radiation Oncology.

Radiation oncology is 1 of the most structured disciplines in medicine. It is of a highly technical nature with reliance on robotic systems to deliver intervention, engagement of diverse expertise, and early adoption of digital approaches to optimize and execute the application of this highly effective cancer treatment. As a localized intervention, the dependence on sensitive, specific, and accurate imaging to define the extent of disease, its heterogeneity, and adjacency to normal tissues directly affects the therapeutic ratio. Image-based in vivo temporal monitoring of the response to treatment enables adaptation and further affects the therapeutic ratio. Thus, more precise intervention will enable fractionation schedules that better interoperate with advances such as immunotherapy. In the data set-rich era that promises precision and personalized medicine, the radiation oncology field will integrate these new data into highly protocoled pathways of care that begin with multimodality prediction and enable patient-specific adaptation of therapy based on quantitative measures of the individual's dose-volume temporal trajectory and midtherapy predictions of response. In addition to advancements in computed tomography imaging, emerging technologies, such as ultra-high-field magnetic resonance and molecular imaging will bring new information to the design of treatments. Next-generation image guided radiation therapy systems will inject high specificity and sensitivity data and stimulate adaptive replanning. In addition, a myriad of pre- and peritherapeutic markers derived from advances in molecular pathology (eg, tumor genomics), automated and comprehensive imaging analytics (eg, radiomics, tumor microenvironment), and many other emerging biomarkers (eg, circulating tumor cell assays) will need to be integrated to maximize the benefit of radiation therapy for an individual patient. We present a perspective on the promise and challenges of fully exploiting imaging data in the pursuit of personalized radiation therapy, drawing from the presentations and broader discussions at the 2016 American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology-National Cancer Institute workshop on Precision Medicine in Radiation Oncology (Bethesda, MD).

[1]  Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer,et al.  Quantitative Imaging Network: Data Sharing and Competitive AlgorithmValidation Leveraging The Cancer Imaging Archive. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[2]  R. Jeraj,et al.  Characterization of positron emission tomography hypoxia tracer uptake and tissue oxygenation via electrochemical modeling. , 2011, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[3]  A. Evans,et al.  MR-guided prostate biopsy for planning of focal salvage after radiation therapy. , 2015, Radiology.

[4]  A. Fyles,et al.  Long-term performance of interstial fluid pressure and hypoxia as prognostic factors in cervix cancer. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  Young Bo Kim,et al.  Early Experience of Pre- and Post-Contrast 7.0T MRI in Brain Tumors , 2013, Journal of Korean medical science.

[6]  Gary Kelloff,et al.  The Quantitative Imaging Network: NCI's Historical Perspective and Planned Goals. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[7]  C. Ménard,et al.  Tumor Hypoxia Predicts Biochemical Failure following Radiotherapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Head and Neck Margin Reduction With Adaptive Radiation Therapy: Robustness of Treatment Plans Against Anatomy Changes. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  R. Jeraj,et al.  Heterogeneity in Intratumor Correlations of 18F-FDG, 18F-FLT, and 61Cu-ATSM PET in Canine Sinonasal Tumors , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  Robert Jeraj,et al.  On the sensitivity of IMRT dose optimization to the mathematical form of a biological imaging-based prescription function , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  D. Brizel,et al.  Prognostic value of tumor oxygenation in 397 head and neck tumors after primary radiation therapy. An international multi-center study. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  R. Jeraj,et al.  Spatiotemporal stability of Cu-ATSM and FLT positron emission tomography distributions during radiation therapy. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Catherine Coolens,et al.  Quantitative Imaging in Radiation Oncology: An Emerging Science and Clinical Service. , 2015, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[14]  G. Sharp,et al.  Vision 20/20: perspectives on automated image segmentation for radiotherapy. , 2014, Medical physics.

[15]  Steen Jakobsen,et al.  FAZA PET/CT hypoxia imaging in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiotherapy: results from the DAHANCA 24 trial. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  R. Jeraj,et al.  Phase 1 trial of bevacizumab with concurrent chemoradiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with exploratory functional imaging of tumor hypoxia, proliferation, and perfusion. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Lei Dong,et al.  Adaptive radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: initial clinical outcomes from a prospective trial. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Issam El Naqa,et al.  Introduction to Big Data in Radiation Oncology: Exploring Opportunities for Research, Quality Assessment, and Clinical Care. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Igor Jurisica,et al.  Tumour genomic and microenvironmental heterogeneity for integrated prediction of 5-year biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort study. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[20]  P. Lambin,et al.  Predicting outcomes in radiation oncology—multifactorial decision support systems , 2013, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[21]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.

[22]  C C Ling,et al.  Towards multidimensional radiotherapy (MD-CRT): biological imaging and biological conformality. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  J G M Kok,et al.  Integrating a 1.5 T MRI scanner with a 6 MV accelerator: proof of concept , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Steve Y. Cho,et al.  PSMA-Based [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT Is Superior to Conventional Imaging for Lesion Detection in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer , 2016, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[25]  Robert Jeraj,et al.  Radiotherapy for head and neck tumours in 2012 and beyond: conformal, tailored, and adaptive? , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[26]  K. Pienta,et al.  PET imaging of prostate-specific membrane antigen in prostate cancer: current state of the art and future challenges , 2016, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Disease.

[27]  Patrick Granton,et al.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[28]  Sadek Nehmeh,et al.  The influence of changes in tumor hypoxia on dose-painting treatment plans based on 18F-FMISO positron emission tomography. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  K. Aldape,et al.  Identification of noninvasive imaging surrogates for brain tumor gene-expression modules , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  D. Jaffray Image-guided radiotherapy: from current concept to future perspectives , 2012, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[31]  Robert Jeraj,et al.  Molecular Imaging to Plan Radiotherapy and Evaluate Its Efficacy , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  A. Fenster,et al.  Toward Prostate Cancer Contouring Guidelines on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Dominant Lesion Gross and Clinical Target Volume Coverage Via Accurate Histology Fusion. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[33]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  Response Assessment Using 18F-FDG PET Early in the Course of Radiotherapy Correlates with Survival in Advanced-Stage Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.