Engineered autologous cartilage tissue for nasal reconstruction after tumour resection: an observational first-in-human trial

BACKGROUND Autologous native cartilage from the nasal septum, ear, or rib is the standard material for surgical reconstruction of the nasal alar lobule after two-layer excision of non-melanoma skin cancer. We assessed whether engineered autologous cartilage grafts allow safe and functional alar lobule restoration. METHODS In a first-in-human trial, we recruited five patients at the University Hospital Basel (Basel, Switzerland). To be eligible, patients had to be aged at least 18 years and have a two-layer defect (≥50% size of alar subunit) after excision of non-melanoma skin cancer on the alar lobule. Chondrocytes (isolated from a 6 mm cartilage biopsy sample from the nasal septum harvested under local anaesthesia during collection of tumour biopsy sample) were expanded, seeded, and cultured with autologous serum onto collagen type I and type III membranes in the course of 4 weeks. The resulting engineered cartilage grafts (25 mm × 25 mm × 2 mm) were shaped intra-operatively and implanted after tumour excision under paramedian forehead or nasolabial flaps, as in standard reconstruction with native cartilage. During flap refinement after 6 months, we took biopsy samples of repair tissues and histologically analysed them. The primary outcomes were safety and feasibility of the procedure, assessed 12 months after reconstruction. At least 1 year after implantation, when reconstruction is typically stabilised, we assessed patient satisfaction and functional outcomes (alar cutaneous sensibility, structural stability, and respiratory flow rate). FINDINGS Between Dec 13, 2010, and Feb 6, 2012, we enrolled two women and three men aged 76-88 years. All engineered grafts contained a mixed hyaline and fibrous cartilage matrix. 6 months after implantation, reconstructed tissues displayed fibromuscular fatty structures typical of the alar lobule. After 1 year, all patients were satisfied with the aesthetic and functional outcomes and no adverse events had been recorded. Cutaneous sensibility and structural stability of the reconstructed area were clinically satisfactory, with adequate respiratory function. INTERPRETATION Autologous nasal cartilage tissues can be engineered and clinically used for functional restoration of alar lobules. Engineered cartilage should now be assessed for other challenging facial reconstructions. FUNDING Foundation of the Department of Surgery, University Hospital Basel; and Krebsliga beider Basel.

[1]  S. Baker,et al.  Reconstruction of nasal alar defects. , 2001, Archives of facial plastic surgery.

[2]  D. Wendt,et al.  The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering. , 2004, Trends in biotechnology.

[3]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  Nasal reconstruction--beyond aesthetic subunits: a 15-year review of 1334 cases. , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  D. Becker,et al.  Clinical study of alar anatomy and surgery of the alar base. , 1997, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[5]  Y. Saban,et al.  The lower nasal base: an anatomical study. , 2013, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[6]  Ivan Martin,et al.  Cell yield, proliferation, and postexpansion differentiation capacity of human ear, nasal, and rib chondrocytes. , 2004, Tissue engineering.

[7]  G. Pierer,et al.  Incomplete excision of basal cell carcinoma in the subunits of the nose , 2008, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[8]  T. Woolford,et al.  Current opinion on auricular reconstruction , 2012, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[9]  M. Kashgarian,et al.  Anatomy of the Caucasian alar groove. , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  R. Sah,et al.  Shape Fidelity of Native and Engineered Human Nasal Septal Cartilage , 2013, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[11]  Charles A. Vacanti,et al.  Transplantation of Chondrocytes Utilizing a Polymer‐Cell Construct to Produce Tissue‐Engineered Cartilage in the Shape of a Human Ear , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  Dieter Wirz,et al.  Bioreactor based engineering of large-scale human cartilage grafts for joint resurfacing. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[13]  W. Lawson,et al.  Complications using grafts and implants in rhinoplasty , 2007 .

[14]  S Weinstein,et al.  Testing sensibility, including touch-pressure, two-point discrimination, point localization, and vibration. , 1993, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[15]  B. Wong,et al.  Model for estimating the threshold mechanical stability of structural cartilage grafts used in rhinoplasty , 2010, The Laryngoscope.

[16]  U. Rieger,et al.  Managing the Ear as a Donor Site For Composite Graft in Nasal Reconstruction: Update on Technical Refinements and Donor Site Morbidity in 110 Cases , 2009, Annals of plastic surgery.

[17]  W. Stoll Complications Following Implantation or Transplantation in Rhinoplasty , 1997, Facial plastic surgery : FPS.

[18]  P. Clement,et al.  Consensus report on acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. , 2005, Rhinology.

[19]  Robert L Sah,et al.  A compositional analysis of human nasal septal cartilage. , 2003, Archives of facial plastic surgery.

[20]  A. Barbero,et al.  A low percentage of autologous serum can replace bovine serum to engineer human nasal cartilage. , 2008, European cells & materials.

[21]  Frederick J Menick,et al.  A 10‐Year Experience in Nasal Reconstruction with the Three‐Stage Forehead Flap , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[22]  Ivan Martin,et al.  Effects of in vitro preculture on in vivo development of human engineered cartilage in an ectopic model. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[23]  J. Leonardi-Bee,et al.  A systematic review of worldwide incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer , 2012, The British journal of dermatology.

[24]  S. K. Han,et al.  Anatomy of the alar lobule in the Asian nose. , 2008, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[25]  F. Menick,et al.  The Subunit Principle in Nasal Reconstruction , 1985, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[26]  D. Zopf,et al.  Full-thickness skin graft overlying a separately harvested auricular cartilage graft for nasal alar reconstruction. , 2012, JAMA facial plastic surgery.

[27]  C. Rorabeck,et al.  Increased damage to type II collagen in osteoarthritic articular cartilage detected by a new immunoassay. , 1994, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[28]  Ivan Martin,et al.  Manufacturing Challenges in Regenerative Medicine , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[29]  Dieter Wirz,et al.  Precultivation of Engineered Human Nasal Cartilage Enhances the Mechanical Properties Relevant for Use in Facial Reconstructive Surgery , 2006, Annals of surgery.

[30]  S. Marlovits,et al.  Gene expression and cell differentiation in matrix-associated chondrocyte transplantation grafts: a comparative study. , 2011, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[31]  Ivan Martin,et al.  Three-dimensional tissue engineering of hyaline cartilage: comparison of adult nasal and articular chondrocytes. , 2002, Tissue engineering.

[32]  K. Yanaga,et al.  Generative Surgery of Cultured Autologous Auricular Chondrocytes for Nasal Augmentation , 2009, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[33]  D. Toriumi,et al.  Grafts amd implants in rhinoplasty and nasal reconstruction. , 1999, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[34]  Ivan Martin,et al.  Bioreactor-based roadmap for the translation of tissue engineering strategies into clinical products. , 2009, Trends in biotechnology.

[35]  Rainer Staudenmaier,et al.  Prefabrication of 3D Cartilage Contructs: Towards a Tissue Engineered Auricle – A Model Tested in Rabbits , 2013, PloS one.