Low-dimensional embedding of fMRI datasets

We propose a novel method to embed a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) dataset in a low-dimensional space. The embedding optimally preserves the local functional coupling between fMRI time series and provides a low-dimensional coordinate system for detecting activated voxels. To compute the embedding, we build a graph of functionally connected voxels. We use the commute time, instead of the geodesic distance, to measure functional distances on the graph. Because the commute time can be computed directly from the eigenvectors of (a symmetric version) the graph probability transition matrix, we use these eigenvectors to embed the dataset in low dimensions. After clustering the datasets in low dimensions, coherent structures emerge that can be easily interpreted. We performed an extensive evaluation of our method comparing it to linear and nonlinear techniques using synthetic datasets and in vivo datasets. We analyzed datasets from the EBC competition obtained with subjects interacting in an urban virtual reality environment. Our exploratory approach is able to detect independently visual areas (V1/V2, V5/MT), auditory areas, and language areas. Our method can be used to analyze fMRI collected during "natural stimuli".

[1]  B. Biswal,et al.  Blind source separation of multiple signal sources of fMRI data sets using independent component analysis. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  J. Meyer,et al.  Functional brain imaging. , 1995, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[4]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Nonlinear Component Analysis as a Kernel Eigenvalue Problem , 1998, Neural Computation.

[5]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Statistical limitations in functional neuroimaging. I. Non-inferential methods and statistical models. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[6]  P. Bérard,et al.  Embedding Riemannian manifolds by their heat kernel , 1994 .

[7]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Extrinsic and intrinsic systems in the posterior cortex of the human brain revealed during natural sensory stimulation. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[9]  A. Dale,et al.  Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[10]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  Independent component analysis of functional MRI: what is signal and what is noise? , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  G. Cecchi,et al.  Scale-free brain functional networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[12]  Karl J. Friston Modes or models: a critique on independent component analysis for fMRI , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Fan Chung,et al.  Spectral Graph Theory , 1996 .

[14]  Stéphane Lafon,et al.  Diffusion maps , 2006 .

[15]  U. Feige,et al.  Spectral Graph Theory , 2015 .

[16]  J F Donin,et al.  Computer assisted tomography. , 1976, The Western journal of medicine.

[17]  Stephen C. Strother,et al.  Support vector machines for temporal classification of block design fMRI data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[18]  E. Bullmore,et al.  A Resilient, Low-Frequency, Small-World Human Brain Functional Network with Highly Connected Association Cortical Hubs , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  T A Carpenter,et al.  Colored noise and computational inference in neurophysiological (fMRI) time series analysis: Resampling methods in time and wavelet domains , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[20]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Statistical limitations in functional neuroimaging. II. Signal detection and statistical inference. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[21]  Olivier Faugeras,et al.  Dynamical components analysis of fMRI data through kernel PCA , 2003, NeuroImage.

[22]  D. Vere-Jones Markov Chains , 1972, Nature.

[23]  Andreas Christmann,et al.  Support vector machines , 2008, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook.

[24]  R. Malach,et al.  Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity During Natural Vision , 2004, Science.

[25]  B. Nadler,et al.  Diffusion maps, spectral clustering and reaction coordinates of dynamical systems , 2005, math/0503445.

[26]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[27]  Jody Tanabe,et al.  See Blockindiscussions, Blockinstats, Blockinand Blockinauthor Blockinprofiles Blockinfor Blockinthis Blockinpublication Comparison Blockinof Blockindetrending Blockinmethods Blockinfor Optimal Blockinfmri Blockinpreprocessing , 2022 .

[28]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Towards natural stimulation in fMRI—Issues of data analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[29]  Karl J. Friston Models of brain function in neuroimaging. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Laplacian Eigenmaps for Dimensionality Reduction and Data Representation , 2003, Neural Computation.

[31]  Arun D Kulkarni,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1991 .

[32]  Silke Dodel,et al.  Detection of signal synchronizations in resting-state fMRI datasets , 2006, NeuroImage.

[33]  Anne Caclin,et al.  Effect of initial fMRI data modeling on the connectivity reported between brain areas , 2006, NeuroImage.

[34]  G Tononi,et al.  Theoretical neuroanatomy: relating anatomical and functional connectivity in graphs and cortical connection matrices. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  J. Morris,et al.  Functional Brain Imaging of Young, Nondemented, and Demented Older Adults , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  François G. Meyer,et al.  Locality and low-dimensions in the prediction of natural experience from fMRI , 2007, NIPS.

[37]  M. Mintun,et al.  Brain work and brain imaging. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[38]  G. Rees,et al.  Neuroimaging: Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.