Identification of a small supernumerary marker chromosome, r(2)(p10q11.2), and the problem of determining prognosis

The identification of small supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs) and the elucidation of their clinical significance remain two of the problems in classical human cytogenetics. We observed a small supernumerary ring in amniotic fluid cell cultures and identified its origin as r(2)(p10q11.2) and its extent by means of fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH). Uniparental disomy (UPD) was excluded by microsatellite analysis using polymorphic markers localised in the same region. On the basis of normal ultrasonographic checks, the patient decided to continue the pregnancy. A normal female was delivered at term and subsequent neonatal follow‐ups confirmed the normal phenotype and development. In the present case, genetic counselling was not helpful because of the absence of reference cases. Detailed characterisation made it possible to correlate the normal baby phenotype with the trisomic 2p10‐2q11.2 genomic region. Further molecular cytogenetic investigations of SMCs classified by DNA content and pregnancy outcome data should improve genetic counselling and risk evaluation. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  R. Tenconi,et al.  NF1 microdeletion syndrome: refined FISH characterization of sporadic and familial deletions with locus-specific probes. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[2]  N. Rubtsov,et al.  Characterization of a small supernumerary ring marker derived from chromosome 2 by forward and reverse chromosome painting. , 1999, American journal of medical genetics.

[3]  J. Crolla.  FISH and molecular studies of autosomal supernumerary marker chromosomes excluding those derived from chromosome 15: II. Review of the literature. , 1998, American journal of medical genetics.

[4]  M. Mattéi,et al.  Clinical Heterogeneity in 16 Patients with inv dup 15 Chromosome: Cytogenetic and Molecular Studies, Search for an Imprinting Effect , 1996, European journal of human genetics : EJHG.

[5]  J. Nelson,et al.  Identification of marker chromosomes in thirteen patients using FISH probing. , 1994, American journal of medical genetics.

[6]  L. Dalprà,et al.  ‘Late’ chorionic villus sampling: Cytogenetic aspects , 1993, Prenatal diagnosis.

[7]  D. Porteous,et al.  YAC mapping by FISH using Alu-PCR-generated probes. , 1992, Genomics.

[8]  D. Warburton,et al.  De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. , 1991, American journal of human genetics.

[9]  J. Yates,et al.  Maternal age specific rates for chromosome aberrations and factors influencing them: Report of a collaborative european study on 52 965 amniocenteses , 1984, Prenatal diagnosis.