Constraints on the semantic extension of onomatopoeia

This article proposes three constraints on the complex polysemy patterns of onomatopoeia. Onomatopoeic forms for thirty types of sounds were collected from Japanese, Korean, Mandarin Chinese, and English, and examined in terms of their semantic extensibility and extension types. It was found that 1) Chinese onomatopoeia is generally resistant to semantic extension, 2) onomatopoeic forms for voice in Japanese and Korean are less likely to be polysemous than those for noise, many of which show metonymical extension, and 3) many onomatopoeic verbs in English have metaphorical meanings. These three patterns can be accounted for by generalizations that associate high semantic extensibility with referential specificity, event-structural complexity, and syntactic coreness, respectively. Each of these generalizations finds some independent support, and is compatible with or complementary to a frame-semantic approach to polysemous onomatopoeic forms, which has been taken to discuss existing, rather than non-existing, cases in each language. This study is, thus, an attempt to locate sound symbolism research in the center of cognitive studies of language.

[1]  L. Talmy Lexicalisation patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms , 1985 .

[2]  R. Waltereit Grammatical Constraints on Metonymy: On the Role of the Direct Object , 1999 .

[3]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  Concept, Image, and Symbol , 1990 .

[4]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[5]  J. Ohala Sound Symbolism , 2004, Encyclopedia of Slavic Languages and Linguistics Online.

[6]  Mark Dingemanse,et al.  The Meaning and use of ideophones in Siwu , 2011 .

[7]  B. Levin Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface , 1994 .

[8]  D. Maurer,et al.  The shape of boubas: sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. , 2006, Developmental science.

[9]  G. Lakoff Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[10]  Kimi Akita,et al.  The lexical iconicity hierarchy and its grammatical correlates , 2013 .

[11]  Beth Levin,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .

[12]  Collin F. Baker,et al.  A Frames Approach to Semantic Analysis , 2009 .

[13]  Jim Feist “Sound symbolism” in English ☆ , 2013 .

[14]  SOTARO KITA,et al.  Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics , 1997 .

[15]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[16]  Rie Hasada Meanings of Japanese sound-symbolic emotion words , 2001 .

[17]  Janis B. Nuckolls,et al.  The Sound-Symbolic Expression of Animacy in Amazonian Ecuador , 2010 .

[18]  L. Nygaard,et al.  Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning , 2009, Cognition.

[19]  SADAYUKI OKADA,et al.  Ir)regularity of Conceptual Expansions in Adjunct Nominals , 2013 .

[20]  B. Heine,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis , 2009 .

[21]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[22]  László Cseresnyési Hinton, Leanne; Nichols, Johanna, and Ohala, John J. (eds.). Sound Symbolism , 1997 .

[23]  S. Kita,et al.  Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning , 2008, Cognition.

[24]  John J. Ohala,et al.  Sound symbolism: English , 1995 .

[25]  Sound symbolism and motion in Basque , 2006 .

[26]  Shoko Hamano The sound-symbolic system of Japanese , 2000 .

[27]  T. Shopen,et al.  Language typology and syntactic description , 2013 .

[28]  筧 寿雄,et al.  Dictionary of iconic expressions in Japanese , 1997 .

[29]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies , 1993 .

[30]  Grace Song,et al.  Making Sense of Corpus Data: A Case Study of Verbs of Sound , 1996 .

[31]  K. Akita Toward a frame-semantic definition of sound-symbolic words: A collocational analysis of Japanese mimetics , 2012 .

[32]  Esther Schindler,et al.  A manner of speaking , 2004, NTWK.