Recently, alcohol fermentation has gained considerable attention with the aim of lowering its production cost in the production processes of both fuel ethanol and alcoholic beverages. The over-all cost is a summation of costs of various subsystems such as raw material (sugar, starch, and cellulosic substances) treatment, fermentation process, and alcohol separation from water solutions; lowering the cost of the fermentation processes is very important in lowering the total cost. Several new techniques have been developed for economic continuous ethanol production, use of a continuous wine fermentor with no mechanical stirring, cell recycle combined with continuous removal of ethanol under vaccum, a technique involving a bed of yeast admixed with an inert carrier, and use of immobilized yeast reactors in packed-bed column and in a three-stage double conical fluidized-bed bioreactor. All these techniques lead to increases more or less, in reactor productivity, which in turn result in the reduction of the reactor size for a given production rate and a particular conversion. Since an improvement in the fermentation process often leads to a reduction of fermentor size and hence, a lowering of the initial construction cost, it is important to theoretically arrive at a solution to what is the minimum-sizemore » setup of ideal reactors from the viewpoint of liquid backmixing. In this short communication, the minimum-sized ideal reactor for continuous alcohol fermentation using immobilized cells will be specifically discussed on the basis of a mathematical model. The solution will serve for designing an optimal bioreactor. (Refs. 26).« less
[1]
T. Yamane,et al.
Overall Effectiveness Factor Incorporating Partition Coefficient for Gel-immobilized Enzyme Pellet
,
1981
.
[2]
David Williams,et al.
The production of ethanol by immobilized yeast cells
,
1981
.
[3]
O. Levenspiel.
The monod equation: A revisit and a generalization to product inhibition situations
,
1980
.
[4]
T. Ghose,et al.
Rapid ethanol fermentation in immobilized yeast cell reactor
,
1980
.
[5]
Rajeshwar Dayal Tyagi,et al.
Rapid ethanol fermentation of cellulose hydrolysate. II. Product and substrate inhibition and optimization of fermentor design
,
1979
.
[6]
C. Wilke,et al.
Process design and economic studies of alternative fermentation methods for the production of ethanol
,
1978
.
[7]
C. Bucke,et al.
The immobilization of microbial cells, subcellular organelles, and enzymes in calcium alginate gels
,
1977,
Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[8]
B. J. Clarke,et al.
CONTINUOUS FERMENTATION OF GLUCOSE SOLUTIONS
,
1977
.
[9]
K. Popper,et al.
Performance characteristics of continuous yeast‐alcohol fermentors with no mechanical stirring
,
1974
.
[10]
Toshimasa Yano,et al.
Dynamic behavior of the chemostat subject to substrate inhibition
,
1969
.
[11]
R. K. Finn,et al.
A kinetic study of the alcoholic fermentation of grape juice
,
1967
.
[12]
B. Franz.
Untersuchungen über die Kinetik der alkoholischen Gärung unter den Bedingungen der Backhefezüchtung
,
1961
.