A system dynamics-based simulation study for managing clinical governance and pathways in a hospital

This paper examines the development of clinical pathways (CP) in a hospital in Australia based on empirical clinical data of patient episodes. A system dynamics (SD)-based decision support system is developed and analysed for this purpose. The study highlights the scenarios that will help hospital administrators to redistribute caseloads among admitting clinicians with a focus on multiple diagnostic-related groups (DRGs) as the means to improve the patient turnaround and hospital throughput without compromising quality patient care. DRGs are the best known classification system used in a casemix funding model. Casemix is a DRG-based government funding model for hospitals with a mix of performance measures aiming to reward initiatives that increase efficiencies in hospitals. The classification system groups inpatient stays into clinically meaningful categories of similar levels of complexity that consume similar amounts of resources. Policy explorations reveal various combinations of the dominant policies that hospital management can adopt. With the use of visual interfaces, executives can manipulate the DSS to test various scenarios. Experimental evidence based on focus groups demonstrated that it can enhance group learning processes and improve decision making. The findings are supported by other recent studies of CP implementation on various DRGs. These showed substantial reduction in length of stay, costs and resource utilization.

[1]  D. Plamping,et al.  The new NHS. , 1991, BMJ.

[2]  M. Enkin,et al.  Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  L. Irwig,et al.  Use of systematic reviews of randomised trials by Australian neonatologists and obstetricians , 1998, The Medical journal of Australia.

[4]  D. Rennie,et al.  The Cochrane Collaboration. Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. , 1995, JAMA.

[5]  Khalid Saeed Defining a problem or constructing a reference mode , 1999 .

[6]  L. Irwig,et al.  Use of systematic reviews of randomised trials by Australian neonatologists and obstetricians. , 1998, The Medical journal of Australia.

[7]  Jeffrey E. Lee,et al.  Cost and Utilization Impact of a Clinical Pathway for Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy , 2000, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[8]  R. Beech,et al.  Health Operations Management: Patient Flow Logistics in Health Care , 2005 .

[9]  L L Leape,et al.  Practice guidelines and standards: an overview. , 1990, QRB. Quality review bulletin.

[10]  J. S. Todd Do practice guidelines guide practice? , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  P. Phillips Disseminating and applying best evidence , 1998, The Medical journal of Australia.

[12]  J Swanson,et al.  Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  Effectiveness of the Clinical Pathway in the Management of Congestive Heart Failure , 2003, Southern medical journal.

[14]  L J Donaldson,et al.  Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England , 1998, BMJ.

[15]  Pam Garside,et al.  Clinical Governance: Making it Happen , 1999, BMJ.

[16]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Business dynamics : systems thinking and modelling for acomplex world , 2002 .

[17]  A. Ellrodt,et al.  Measuring and Improving Physician Compliance with Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Controlled Interventional Trial , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  Erik Demeulemeester,et al.  Evaluating the Capacity of Clinical Pathways through Discrete-Event Simulation , 2007 .

[19]  I. Chalmers The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[20]  R. Thomson,et al.  Fortnightly Review: How to ensure that guidelines are effective , 1995 .