Spontaneous Raman Scattering Diagnostics: Applications in Practical Combustion Systems

In this chapter, the recent advancements and practical aspects of laser SRS diagnostics have been reviewed wi til regards to applications in practical combustion systems. Clearly, SRS represents a theoretically and experimentally mature diagnostic technology that has become an essential tool for multiscalar measurements in turbulent combustion at elevated pressures. Today, time-, space-, spectrally, and even polarization-resolved S RS diagnostics is at hand, with aid from recent innovations in theoretical and technological developments on electro-optical or electromechanical devices. Whilst a linear increase in SRS signals can be expected in high-pressure systems (this is perhaps one of the most important advantages for using SRS in high-pressure systems), there are practical (often severe) restrictions associated with pressurized vessels, due mainly to the limited degree of optical access. This narrows ti,e available choice of diagnostics that can be employed at any given time. Point-wise SRS diagnostics provides the highest accuracy on the chemical species and temperature measurements, and will continue to remain a vital approach for the study in such harsh environments. The practical design considerations and hands-on set-up guide for SRS diagnostics provided in this chapter are rarely presented elsewhere. Although the second-harmonic Nd:YAG pulsed laser (532 nm), combined with pulse-stretching optics or the recently introduced White Cell-based laser, seems to be the most favored excitation source of choice by the research community, UV excitation will undoubtedly continue to be used on many occasions, and especially in sooting flames. Detection methods may be divided into ICCD-based nanosecond-gate detection or a rotary-chopper electromechanical shutter-based CCD array detection, and the levels of background flame emission in individual cases would determine this critical design choice. Here, a process of Raman signal calibration based on ti,e crosstalk matrix formalism was explained step-by-step. As tI,is process may be very time-consuming and expensive, a well-planned experimental approach (01' building a transferable calibration database or library (at least with in a user's own facility over a series of different testing and runs) is vitally important. Hands on advice on the design and construction of flow control systems for high pressure burner facilities were also presented.

[1]  Q. Nguyen,et al.  Observation of Turbulent Mixing in Lean-Direct-Injection Combustion at Elevated Pressure , 2008 .

[2]  Winfried Stricker,et al.  Investigations in the TECFLAM swirling diffusion flame: Laser Raman measurements and CFD calculations , 2000 .

[3]  Marcus Aldén,et al.  Combustion at the focus: laser diagnostics and control , 2005 .

[4]  van der Jjam Joost Mullen,et al.  Thomson scattering on a low-pressure, inductively-coupled gas discharge lamp , 2002 .

[5]  Sebastian A. Kaiser,et al.  Multiscalar imaging in partially premixed jet flames with argon dilution , 2005 .

[6]  R. Barlow,et al.  The structure of turbulent nonpremixed flames revealed by Raman-Rayleigh-LIF measurements , 1996 .

[7]  Q. Nguyen,et al.  Measurement and simulation of spontaneous Raman scattering in high-pressure fuel-rich H2–air flames , 2004 .

[8]  Quang-Viet Nguyen,et al.  Quantitative analysis of spectral interference of spontaneous Raman scattering in high-pressure fuel-rich H2–air combustion , 2005 .

[9]  Robert S. Barlow,et al.  Laser diagnostics and their interplay with computations to understand turbulent combustion , 2007 .

[10]  Douglas L. Straub,et al.  Optically Accessible Pressurized Research Combustor for Computational Fluid Dynamics Model Validation , 2006 .

[11]  Douglas A. Greenhalgh,et al.  A combustion temperature and species standard for the calibration of laser diagnostic techniques , 2006 .

[12]  W. Meier,et al.  Laser Raman scattering in fuel-rich flames: background levels at different excitation wavelengths , 2002 .

[13]  P. Miles Raman line imaging for spatially and temporally resolved mole fraction measurements in internal combustion engines. , 1999, Applied optics.

[14]  M. Long,et al.  Simultaneous two-dimensional mapping of species concentration and temperature in turbulent flames. , 1985, Optics letters.

[15]  Volker Beushausen,et al.  Interference-free UV-laser-induced Raman and Rayleigh measurements in hydrocarbon combustion using polarization properties , 1995 .

[16]  A shutter-based line-imaging system for single-shot raman scattering measurements of gradients in mixture fraction , 2000 .

[17]  M. Aldén,et al.  Stray Light Rejection in Rotational Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Spectroscopy by use of a Sodium-Seeded Flame. , 1998, Applied optics.

[18]  Robert C. Anderson,et al.  Optical measurement and visualization in high-pressure high-temperature aviation gas turbine combustors , 2000, Symposium on Applied Photonics.

[19]  Quang-Viet Nguyen,et al.  Laser pulse-stretching with multiple optical ring cavities. , 2002, Applied optics.

[20]  Thomas Seeger,et al.  Application of 266-nm and 355-nm Nd:YAG laser radiation for the investigation of fuel-rich sooting hydrocarbon flames by raman scattering. , 2004, Applied optics.

[21]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  Quantitative NO-LIF imaging in high-pressure flames , 2002 .

[22]  Christoph Hassa,et al.  Single-pulse 1D laser Raman scattering applied in a gas turbine model combustor at elevated pressure , 2007 .

[23]  Q. Nguyen,et al.  Single-shot rotational Raman thermometry for turbulent flames using a low-resolution bandwidth technique , 2007 .

[24]  A. Karpetis,et al.  An experimental study of well-defined turbulent nonpremixed spray flames , 2000 .

[25]  R. Barlow,et al.  Raman-LIF measurements of temperature, major species, OH, and NO in a methane-air Bunsen flame , 1996 .

[26]  R. Barlow,et al.  Application of Raman/Rayleigh/LIF diagnostics in turbulent stratified flames , 2009 .

[27]  Wolfgang Meier,et al.  Investigations of swirl flames in a gas turbine model combustor: II. Turbulence–chemistry interactions , 2006 .

[28]  Assaad R. Masri,et al.  The compositional structure of swirl-stabilised turbulent nonpremixed flames , 2004 .

[29]  R. J. Locke,et al.  One-dimensional uv-raman imaging of a jet-a-fueled aircraft combustor in a high temperature and pressure test cell: A feasibility study , 2002 .

[30]  Y. Zhou,et al.  Pressure dependence of vibrational Raman scattering of narrow-band, 248-nm, laser light by H2, N2, O2, CO2, CH4, C2H6, and C3H8 as high as 97 bar , 2000 .

[31]  V. Katta,et al.  Two-color, two-photon laser-induced polarization spectroscopy (LIPS) measurements of atomic hydrogen in near-adiabatic, atmospheric pressure hydrogen/air flames , 2004 .

[32]  Turbulent opposed-jet flames: A critical benchmark experiment for combustion LES , 2005 .

[33]  Alfred Leipertz,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the near-wall mixture formation process in a passenger car direct-injection diesel engine by using linear raman spectroscopy. , 2005, Applied optics.

[34]  R. Schefer,et al.  Laser imaging system for determination of three-dimensional scalar gradients in turbulent flames. , 2004, Optics letters.

[35]  Egon Hassel,et al.  Laser diagnostics for studies of turbulent combustion , 2000 .

[36]  Y. Chen,et al.  Line Raman, Rayleigh, and laser-induced predissociation fluorescence technique for combustion with a tunable KrF excimer laser. , 1996, Applied optics.