Frontoparietal action-oriented codes support novel instruction implementation

A key aspect of human cognitive flexibility concerns the ability to convert complex symbolic instructions into novel behaviors. Previous research proposes that this transformation is supported by two neurocognitive states: an initial declarative maintenance of task knowledge, and an implementation state necessary for optimal task execution. Furthermore, current models predict a crucial role of frontal and parietal brain regions in this process. However, whether declarative and procedural signals independently contribute to implementation remains unknown. We report the results of an fMRI experiment in which participants executed novel instructed stimulus-response associations. We then used a pattern-tracking procedure to quantify the contribution of format-unique signals during instruction implementation. This revealed independent procedural and declarative representations of novel S-Rs in frontoparietal areas, prior to execution. Critically, the degree of procedural activation predicted subsequent behavioral performance. Altogether, our results suggest an important contribution of frontoparietal regions to the neural architecture that regulates cognitive flexibility.

[1]  María Ruz,et al.  Transient and Sustained Control Mechanisms Supporting Novel Instructed Behavior. , 2018, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  Baptist Liefooghe,et al.  Automatic effects of instructions do not require the intention to execute these instructions , 2018 .

[4]  David Badre,et al.  Just above Chance: Is It Harder to Decode Information from Prefrontal Cortex Hemodynamic Activity Patterns? , 2018, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  John-Dylan Haynes,et al.  The Neural Representation of Voluntary Task-Set Selection in Dynamic Environments. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[7]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Reflexive activation of newly instructed stimulus–response rules: evidence from lateralized readiness potentials in no-go trials , 2015, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[8]  Marcel Brass,et al.  The implementation of verbal instructions: Dissociating motor preparation from the formation of stimulus–response associations , 2012, NeuroImage.

[9]  M. Brass,et al.  The implementation of verbal instructions: An fMRI study , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[10]  B. Postle,et al.  Different states of priority recruit different neural codes in visual working memory , 2018, bioRxiv.

[11]  Michael Andres,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Dissociates Prefrontal and Parietal Contributions to Task Preparation , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  A. Nobre,et al.  Prioritizing Information during Working Memory: Beyond Sustained Internal Attention , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Olivier Ledoit,et al.  A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices , 2004 .

[14]  A. Nobre,et al.  Attentional modulation of object representations in working memory. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  M. Brass,et al.  The effects of declaratively maintaining and proactively proceduralizing novel stimulus-response mappings , 2020, Cognition.

[16]  Senne Braem,et al.  Encoding of Novel Verbal Instructions for Prospective Action in the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex: Evidence from Univariate and Multivariate Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis , 2018, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Alexandra Woolgar,et al.  Adaptive coding in the human brain: Distinct object features are encoded by overlapping voxels in frontoparietal cortex , 2018, Cortex.

[18]  Hans Knutsson,et al.  Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  David Badre,et al.  Just above chance: is it harder to decode information from human prefrontal cortex BOLD signals? , 2017, bioRxiv.

[20]  M. Brass,et al.  Attentional prioritization reconfigures novel instructions into action-oriented task sets , 2020, Cognition.

[21]  Christopher H. Chatham,et al.  Corticostriatal Output Gating during Selection from Working Memory , 2014, Neuron.

[22]  Nicholas E. Myers,et al.  Benefits of Flexible Prioritization in Working Memory Can Arise Without Costs , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Anina N. Rich,et al.  Flexible Coding of Task Rules in Frontoparietal Cortex: An Adaptive System for Flexible Cognitive Control , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Senne Braem,et al.  Following new task instructions: Evidence for a dissociation between knowing and doing , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[25]  Mark G. Stokes,et al.  Attention Biases Visual Activity in Visual Short-term Memory , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  J. Duncan,et al.  Intelligence and the Frontal Lobe: The Organization of Goal-Directed Behavior , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Rapid instructed task learning: A new window into the human brain’s unique capacity for flexible cognitive control , 2013, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[28]  Javier Ramírez,et al.  Encoding, preparation and implementation of novel complex verbal instructions , 2017, NeuroImage.

[29]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Instruction-based task-rule congruency effects. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Real-world objects are not represented as bound units: independent forgetting of different object details from visual memory. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  Romain Quentin,et al.  Differential Brain Mechanisms of Selection and Maintenance of Information during Working Memory , 2019, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Marcel Brass,et al.  There is more into ‘doing’ than ‘knowing’: The function of the right inferior frontal sulcus is specific for implementing versus memorising verbal instructions , 2016, NeuroImage.

[33]  Daniel J Mitchell,et al.  Neural Coding for Instruction‐Based Task Sets in Human Frontoparietal and Visual Cortex , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Conceptual Distinctiveness Supports Detailed Visual Long-term Memory for Real-world Objects the Fidelity of Long-term Memory for Visual Information , 2022 .

[35]  Marcel Brass,et al.  The what and how components of cognitive control , 2012, NeuroImage.

[36]  Hannes Ruge,et al.  Rapid formation of pragmatic rule representations in the human brain during instruction-based learning. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  Luiz Pessoa,et al.  Representational Organization of Novel Task Sets during Proactive Encoding , 2019, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  BIDS apps: Improving ease of use, accessibility, and reproducibility of neuroimaging data analysis methods , 2016, bioRxiv.

[39]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Reliability of dissimilarity measures for multi-voxel pattern analysis , 2016, NeuroImage.

[40]  Benjamin J. Tamber-Rosenau,et al.  Cortical Mechanisms of Cognitive Control for Shifting Attention in Vision and Working Memory , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  Katherine Guérard,et al.  Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS) Phase II: 930 New Normative Photos , 2014, PloS one.

[42]  Martin N. Hebart,et al.  The Decoding Toolbox (TDT): a versatile software package for multivariate analyses of functional imaging data , 2015, Front. Neuroinform..

[43]  J. Houwer,et al.  Instruction-based response activation depends on task preparation , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  H. Jeffreys A Treatise on Probability , 1922, Nature.

[46]  G. Griffin,et al.  Caltech-256 Object Category Dataset , 2007 .

[47]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  The power of instructions: Proactive configuration of stimulus-response translation. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[48]  John Duncan,et al.  Goal neglect and knowledge chunking in the construction of novel behaviour☆ , 2014, Cognition.

[49]  Aude Oliva,et al.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Michael C. Anderson,et al.  Retrieval induces adaptive forgetting of competing memories via cortical pattern suppression , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  When planning results in loss of control: intention-based reflexivity and working-memory , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[52]  P. Maquet,et al.  Orienting Attention to Locations in Perceptual Versus Mental Representations , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  Arthur J. Nozik,et al.  Physical Chemistry of Semiconductor−Liquid Interfaces , 1996 .

[54]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[55]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Broad domain generality in focal regions of frontal and parietal cortex , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Ernest Mas-Herrero,et al.  Task-specific preparatory neural activations in low-interference contexts , 2016, Brain Structure and Function.

[57]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Information-based functional brain mapping. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  Baptist Liefooghe,et al.  Automatic motor activation by mere instruction , 2014, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.

[59]  Luiz Pessoa,et al.  Representational organization of novel task sets during proactive encoding , 2019 .

[60]  Karim Jerbi,et al.  Exceeding chance level by chance: The caveat of theoretical chance levels in brain signal classification and statistical assessment of decoding accuracy , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.