Low Latency Estimation of Motor Intentions to Assist Reaching Movements along Multiple Sessions in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Feasibility Study

Background: The association between motor-related cortical activity and peripheral stimulation with temporal precision has been proposed as a possible intervention to facilitate cortico-muscular pathways and thereby improve motor rehabilitation after stroke. Previous studies with patients have provided evidence of the possibility to implement brain-machine interface platforms able to decode motor intentions and use this information to trigger afferent stimulation and movement assistance. This study tests the use a low-latency movement intention detector to drive functional electrical stimulation assisting upper-limb reaching movements of patients with stroke. Methods: An eight-sessions intervention on the paretic arm was tested on four chronic stroke patients along 1 month. Patients' intentions to initiate reaching movements were decoded from electroencephalographic signals and used to trigger functional electrical stimulation that in turn assisted patients to do the task. The analysis of the patients' ability to interact with the intervention platform, the assessment of changes in patients' clinical scales and of the system usability and the kinematic analysis of the reaching movements before and after the intervention period were carried to study the potential impact of the intervention. Results: On average 66.3 ± 15.7% of trials (resting intervals followed by self-initiated movements) were correctly classified with the decoder of motor intentions. The average detection latency (with respect to the movement onsets estimated with gyroscopes) was 112 ± 278 ms. The Fügl-Meyer index upper extremity increased 11.5 ± 5.5 points with the intervention. The stroke impact scale also increased. In line with changes in clinical scales, kinematics of reaching movements showed a trend toward lower compensatory mechanisms. Patients' assessment of the therapy reflected their acceptance of the proposed intervention protocol. Conclusions: According to results obtained here with a small sample of patients, Brain-Machine Interfaces providing low-latency support to upper-limb reaching movements in patients with stroke are a reliable and usable solution for motor rehabilitation interventions with potential functional benefits.

[1]  Luis Montesano,et al.  Control of an Ambulatory Exoskeleton with a Brain–Machine Interface for Spinal Cord Injury Gait Rehabilitation , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[2]  Dario Farina,et al.  An Associative Brain-Computer-Interface for Acute Stroke Patients , 2017 .

[3]  J L Pons,et al.  Detection of the onset of upper-limb movements based on the combined analysis of changes in the sensorimotor rhythms and slow cortical potentials , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[4]  Jose L. Contreras-Vidal,et al.  Design and Optimization of an EEG-Based Brain Machine Interface (BMI) to an Upper-Limb Exoskeleton for Stroke Survivors , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[5]  José Luis Pons Rovira,et al.  A Closed-Loop Brain–Computer Interface Triggering an Active Ankle–Foot Orthosis for Inducing Cortical Neural Plasticity , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[7]  D. Farina,et al.  Precise temporal association between cortical potentials evoked by motor imagination and afference induces cortical plasticity , 2012, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  M. Hallett,et al.  What is the Bereitschaftspotential? , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  Yukihiro Hara [Novel functional electrical stimulation for neurorehabilitation]. , 2010, Brain and nerve = Shinkei kenkyu no shinpo.

[10]  S. Page,et al.  Clinically Important Differences for the Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in People With Minimal to Moderate Impairment Due to Chronic Stroke , 2012, Physical Therapy.

[11]  J. Millán,et al.  Single trial prediction of self-paced reaching directions from EEG signals , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[12]  A. Pavlovic,et al.  Efficient neuroplasticity induction in chronic stroke patients by an associative brain-computer interface. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  recoveriX: A new BCI-based technology for persons with stroke , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[14]  M. Molinari,et al.  Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[15]  K. Hrovat,et al.  Abnormal cognitive planning and movement smoothness control for a complex shoulder/elbow motor task in stroke survivors , 2007, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[16]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[17]  Mads Jochumsen,et al.  Feature domain-specific movement intention detection for stroke rehabilitation with brain-computer interfaces , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[18]  B. Bussel,et al.  Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients , 2003, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[19]  Agnès Roby-Brami,et al.  Hand orientation for grasping and arm joint rotation patterns in healthy subjects and hemiparetic stroke patients , 2003, Brain Research.

[20]  S. Perera,et al.  Stroke Impact Scale-16 , 2003, Neurology.

[21]  J. Pons,et al.  Task Influence on Motor-Related Cortical Signals: Comparison Between Upper and Lower Limb Coordinated and Analytic Movements , 2017 .

[22]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Resting State Changes in Functional Connectivity Correlate With Movement Recovery for BCI and Robot-Assisted Upper-Extremity Training After Stroke , 2013, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[23]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Towards adaptive classification for BCI , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[24]  Alan J. Thompson,et al.  Functional significance of the ipsilateral hemisphere during movement of the affected hand after stroke , 2004, Experimental Neurology.

[25]  J. Lefaucheur Stroke recovery can be enhanced by using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) , 2006, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  H Shibasaki,et al.  Components of the movement-related cortical potential and their scalp topography. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  G. Fulk,et al.  How Much Change in the Stroke Impact Scale-16 Is Important to People Who Have Experienced a Stroke? , 2010, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[28]  P. Duncan,et al.  Measurement of Motor Recovery After Stroke: Outcome Assessment and Sample Size Requirements , 1992, Stroke.

[29]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Hybrid Neuroprosthesis for the Upper Limb: Combining Brain-Controlled Neuromuscular Stimulation with a Multi-Joint Arm Exoskeleton , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[30]  R Y Wang,et al.  Neuromodulation of effects of upper limb motor function and shoulder range of motion by functional electric stimulation (FES). , 2007, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[31]  G. Yue,et al.  Prolonged cognitive planning time, elevated cognitive effort, and relationship to coordination and motor control following stroke , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[32]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[33]  Chuang Lin,et al.  Discriminative Manifold Learning Based Detection of Movement-Related Cortical Potentials , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[34]  Ning Jiang,et al.  Enhanced Low-Latency Detection of Motor Intention From EEG for Closed-Loop Brain-Computer Interface Applications , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Brain-computer interface-based robotic end effector system for wrist and hand rehabilitation: results of a three-armed randomized controlled trial for chronic stroke , 2014, Front. Neuroeng..

[36]  Jose Gonzalez-Vargas,et al.  Feedback Error Learning Controller for Functional Electrical Stimulation Assistance in a Hybrid Robotic System for Reaching Rehabilitation , 2016, European journal of translational myology.

[37]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Brain–robot interface driven plasticity: Distributed modulation of corticospinal excitability , 2016, NeuroImage.

[38]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: A controlled study , 2013, Annals of neurology.

[39]  Jose L Pons,et al.  Detection of the Onset of Voluntary Movements Based on the Combination of ERD and BP Cortical Patterns , 2014 .