Analysis of ambiguity in visual pattern completion.

It is possible to construct an ambiguous line drawing representing several objects partly hidden behind another object. This article deals with two problems: (a) What are the necessary and sufficient conditions for ambiguity to occur? (b) How can the response frequencies of the completions of ambiguous drawings be explained? Whether completions occur or not, the predictions based on the coding theory, better termed the structural information theory, have been discussed in a previous article (Buffart, Leeuwenberg, & Restle, 1981). It is shown here that the theory also specifies the conditions for ambiguity to occur. The theory describes all possible interpretations of a drawing and selects those interpretations or completions to which subjects will respond. A direct relation between the response frequencies and the possible theoretical descriptions of each response is shown to exist. Two one-parameter models describing the behavior of subjects each fit the response frequencies measured in two experiments with 25 drawings. It is argued that the type of ambiguity that is studied in both experiments generally appears during the perceptual process. The character of the theoretical descriptions indicates that guidance of perceptual behavior by interpretations might occur.

[1]  J. Jastrow.  The Mind's Eye. , 1899 .

[2]  M. Wertheimer.  Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II , 1923 .

[3]  K. Koffka.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[4]  P. Ratoosh,et al.  On Interposition as a Cue for the Perception of Distance. , 1949, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  A. Chapanis,et al.  Interposition as a Cue for the Perception of Relative Distance , 1953 .

[6]  M. Wertheimer,et al.  Some determinants of phenomenal overlapping. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[7]  Donald M. MacKay,et al.  Theoretical Models of Space Perception , 1962 .

[8]  W. R. Garner.  To perceive is to know. , 1966 .

[9]  H. Simon.  An information-processing explanation of some perceptual phenomena. , 1967, British journal of psychology.

[10]  F. Attneave.  Triangles as ambiguous figures. , 1968, The American journal of psychology.

[11]  E. Leeuwenberg.  Quantitative specification of information in sequential patterns. , 1969, Psychological review.

[12]  E. Leeuwenberg.  A perceptual coding language for visual and auditory patterns. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[13]  Richard L. Gregory,et al.  CHOOSING A PARADIGM FOR PERCEPTION , 1974 .

[14]  J. Hochberg.  ORGANIZATION AND THE GESTALT TRADITION , 1974 .

[15]  I. Rock,et al.  An introduction to perception , 1975 .

[16]  H. F. J. M. Buffart,et al.  Formal theories of visual perception , 1978 .

[17]  H. V. Tuijl,et al.  Neon color spreading and structural information measures , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  S. Palmer.  What makes triangles point: Local and global effects in configurations of ambiguous triangles , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  Harrie F J M van Tuijl.  Perceptual interpretation of complex line patterns. , 1980 .

[20]  E. Leeuwenberg,et al.  Coding theory of visual pattern completion. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  J. Hochberg.  On cognition in perception: Perceptual coupling and unconscious inference , 1981, Cognition.

[22]  E Leeuwenberg,et al.  The perception of assimilation and brightness contrast as derived from code theory , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Hans-Georg Geissler,et al.  Modern issues in perception , 1983 .

[24]  R. F. A. Collard,et al.  Minimization of structural information: A set-theoretical approach , 1983, Pattern Recognit..

[25]  Ambiguity, beauty, and interestingness of line drawings. , 1983 .

[26]  Emanuel Leeuwenberg,et al.  Structural Information Theory , 1983 .

[27]  Mary A. Peterson,et al.  Opposed-set measurement procedure: A quantitative analysis of the role of local cues and intention in form perception. , 1983 .

[28]  E Leeuwenberg,et al.  The perception of foreground and background as derived from structural information theory. , 1984, Acta psychologica.