Axial T2* mapping in intervertebral discs: a new technique for assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration

AbstractObjectivesTo demonstrate the potential benefits of biochemical axial T2* mapping of intervertebral discs (IVDs) regarding the detection and grading of early stages of degenerative disc disease using 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a clinical setting.MethodsNinety-three patients suffering from lumbar spine problems were examined using standard MRI protocols including an axial T2* mapping protocol. All discs were classified morphologically and grouped as “healthy” or “abnormal”. Differences between groups were analysed regarding to the specific T2* pattern at different regions of interest (ROIs).ResultsHealthy intervertebral discs revealed a distinct cross-sectional T2* value profile: T2* values were significantly lower in the annulus fibrosus compared with the nucleus pulposus (P = 0.01). In abnormal IVDs, T2* values were significantly lower, especially towards the centre of the disc representing the expected decreased water content of the nucleus (P = 0.01). In herniated discs, ROIs within the nucleus pulposus and ROIs covering the annulus fibrosus showed decreased T2* values.ConclusionsAxial T2* mapping is effective to detect early stages of degenerative disc disease. There is a potential benefit of axial T2* mapping as a diagnostic tool, allowing the quantitative assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration.Key Points• Axial T2* mapping effective in detecting early degenerative disc disease. • Healthy and abnormal intervertebral discs revealed distinct cross-sectional T2* value profiles. • T2* can be performed at 1.5 T in a clinical setting.

[1]  Siegfried Trattnig,et al.  Quantitative T2 evaluation at 3.0T compared to morphological grading of the lumbar intervertebral disc: a standardized evaluation approach in patients with low back pain. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[2]  L. Benneker,et al.  Biochemical T2* MR quantification of ankle arthrosis in pes cavovarus , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[3]  M. Aebi,et al.  The human lumbar intervertebral disc: evidence for changes in the biosynthesis and denaturation of the extracellular matrix with growth, maturation, ageing, and degeneration. , 1996, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[4]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Classification of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration , 2001, Spine.

[5]  Siegfried Trattnig,et al.  Lumbar intervertebral disc abnormalities: comparison of quantitative T2 mapping with conventional MR at 3.0 T , 2010, European Radiology.

[6]  Y. Xia,et al.  Magic-Angle Effect in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage: A Review , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[7]  P. Hardy Intervertebral disks on MR images: variation in signal intensity with the disk-to-magnetic field orientation. , 1996, Radiology.

[8]  Keita Ito,et al.  Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[9]  F Cantraine,et al.  A Cadaveric Study Comparing Discography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Histology, and Mechanical Behavior of the Human Lumbar Disc , 1992, Spine.

[10]  S. Trattnig,et al.  Parametric T2 and T2* mapping techniques to visualize intervertebral disc degeneration in patients with low back pain: initial results on the clinical use of 3.0 Tesla MRI , 2011, Skeletal Radiology.

[11]  V. Podichetty The aging spine: the role of inflammatory mediators in intervertebral disc degeneration. , 2007, Cellular and molecular biology.

[12]  J A Buckwalter,et al.  Aging and degeneration of the human intervertebral disc. , 1995, Spine.

[13]  J. P. Thompson,et al.  Preliminary Evaluation of a Scheme for Grading the Gross Morphology of the Human Intervertebral Disc , 1990, Spine.

[14]  C. Boesch,et al.  Quantitative MR imaging of lumbar intervertebral disks and vertebral bodies: influence of diurnal water content variations. , 1993, Radiology.

[15]  P. Dangerfield,et al.  Quantitative analysis of diurnal variation in volume and water content of lumbar intervertebral discs , 1998, Clinical anatomy.

[16]  M. Zlatkin,et al.  In vivo and ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of early disc degeneration with histopathologic correlation. , 1991, Spine.

[17]  L. Manchikanti Epidemiology of low back pain. , 2000, Pain physician.

[18]  Takayuki Obata,et al.  Classification of intervertebral disk degeneration with axial T2 mapping. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  B. J. Murphy Evaluation of grades 3 and 4 chondromalacia of the knee using T2*-weighted 3D gradient-echo articular cartilage imaging , 2001, Skeletal Radiology.

[20]  Ilkka Lehto,et al.  Diurnal fluid changes of lumbar discs measured indirectly by magnetic resonance imaging , 1994, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.