Distributed fair allocation of indivisible goods

Distributed mechanisms for allocating indivisible goods are mechanisms lacking central control, in which agents can locally agree on deals to exchange some of the goods in their possession. We study convergence properties for such distributed mechanisms when used as fair division procedures. Specifically, we identify sets of assumptions under which any sequence of deals meeting certain conditions will converge to a proportionally fair allocation and to an envy-free allocation, respectively. We also introduce an extension of the basic framework where agents are vertices of a graph representing a social network that constrains which agents can interact with which other agents, and we prove a similar convergence result for envy-freeness in this context. Finally, when not all assumptions guaranteeing envy-freeness are satisfied, we may want to minimise the degree of envy exhibited by an outcome. To this end, we introduce a generic framework for measuring the degree of envy in a society and establish the computational complexity of checking whether a given scenario allows for a deal that is beneficial to every agent involved and that will reduce overall envy.

[1]  Yann Chevaleyre,et al.  How equitable is rational negotiation? , 2006, AAMAS '06.

[2]  Yann Chevaleyre,et al.  Simple negotiation schemes for agents with simple preferences: sufficiency, necessity and maximality , 2010, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[3]  Amnon Meisels,et al.  Distributed envy minimization for resource allocation , 2015, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[4]  Yingqian Zhang,et al.  On the Complexity of Efficiency and Envy-Freeness in Fair Division of Indivisible Goods with Additive Preferences , 2009, ADT.

[5]  Jack M. Robertson,et al.  Cake-cutting algorithms - be fair if you can , 1998 .

[6]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Contract Types for Satisficing Task Allocation , 1998 .

[7]  Flip Klijn,et al.  An algorithm for envy-free allocations in an economy with indivisible objects and money , 2000, Soc. Choice Welf..

[8]  Yann Chevaleyre,et al.  Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods , 2016, Handbook of Computational Social Choice.

[9]  Tuomas Sandholm Contract Types for Satisficing Task Allocation:I Theoretical Results , 2002 .

[10]  Jérôme Lang,et al.  Efficiency and envy-freeness in fair division of indivisible goods: logical representation and complexity , 2005, IJCAI.

[11]  Jörg Rothe,et al.  Minimizing envy and maximizing average Nash social welfare in the allocation of indivisible goods , 2014, Discret. Appl. Math..

[12]  Michel Gendreau,et al.  Combinatorial auctions , 2007, Ann. Oper. Res..

[13]  Polskie Towarzystwo Matematyczne Annales de la Société Polonaise de Mathématique , 1952 .

[14]  Harold W. Kuhn,et al.  The Hungarian method for the assignment problem , 1955, 50 Years of Integer Programming.

[15]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[16]  H. Moulin Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making , 1988 .

[17]  Steven Vajda,et al.  The Theory of Linear Economic Models , 1960 .

[18]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  The complexity of contract negotiation , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[19]  Steven J. Brams,et al.  Divide-and-Conquer: A Proportional, Minimal-Envy Cake-Cutting Procedure , 2007, Fair Division.

[20]  Steven J. Brams,et al.  Divide-and-Conquer: A Proportional, Minimal-Envy Cake-Cutting Algorithm , 2010, SIAM Rev..

[21]  A. Kirman,et al.  Fairness and Envy , 1974 .

[22]  Matthias G. Raith,et al.  Bidding for envy-freeness: A procedural approach to n-player fair-division problems , 2002, Soc. Choice Welf..

[23]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Truth revelation in approximately efficient combinatorial auctions , 2002, EC '99.

[24]  Yingqian Zhang,et al.  Multiagent task allocation in social networks , 2011, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[25]  W. Thomson Fair Allocation Rules , 2011 .

[26]  Yingqian Zhang,et al.  Distributed task allocation in social networks , 2007, AAMAS '07.

[27]  Yann Chevaleyre,et al.  Reaching Envy-Free States in Distributed Negotiation Settings , 2007, IJCAI.

[28]  Elchanan Mossel,et al.  On approximately fair allocations of indivisible goods , 2004, EC '04.

[29]  Ulrich Endriss,et al.  Multiagent resource allocation with sharable items , 2013, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[30]  Yann Chevaleyre,et al.  Issues in Multiagent Resource Allocation , 2006, Informatica.

[31]  Nicolas Maudet,et al.  On the Communication Complexity of Multilateral Trading: Extended Report , 2005, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[32]  D. Gale,et al.  Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods and Criteria of Justice , 1991 .

[33]  Jörg Rothe,et al.  Degrees of Guaranteed Envy-Freeness in Finite Bounded Cake-Cutting Protocols , 2009, WINE.

[34]  Koichi Tadenuma Trade-off between equity and efficiency in a general economy with indivisible goods , 1996 .

[35]  Clemens Puppe,et al.  A simple procedure for finding equitable allocations of indivisible goods , 2002, Soc. Choice Welf..

[36]  Kate Larson,et al.  Matching with Dynamic Ordinal Preferences , 2015, AAAI.

[37]  Nicolas Maudet,et al.  Negotiating Socially Optimal Allocations of Resources , 2011, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[38]  Steven J. Brams,et al.  Fair division - from cake-cutting to dispute resolution , 1998 .

[39]  Carmen Beviá Baeza Fair allocation in a general model with indivisible goods , 1994 .

[40]  Matthias G. Raith,et al.  Fair-negotiation procedures , 2000, Math. Soc. Sci..

[41]  Ioannis Caragiannis,et al.  On Low-Envy Truthful Allocations , 2009, ADT.

[42]  D. Foley Resource allocation and the public sector , 1967 .

[43]  Ariel D. Procaccia Cake Cutting Algorithms , 2016, Handbook of Computational Social Choice.

[44]  Ronald M. Harstad,et al.  Computationally Manageable Combinational Auctions , 1998 .

[45]  Yann Chevaleyre,et al.  Allocating Goods on a Graph to Eliminate Envy , 2007, AAAI.

[46]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Combinatorial Auctions , 2005, Encyclopedia of Wireless Networks.

[47]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Bidding Languages for Combinatorial Auctions , 2005 .