Exact group‐sequential designs for clinical trials with randomized play‐the‐winner allocation

The use of both sequential designs and adaptive treatment allocation are effective in reducing the number of patients receiving an inferior treatment in a clinical trial. In large samples, when the asymptotic normality of test statistics can be utilized, a standard sequential design can be combined with adaptive allocation. In small samples the planned error rate constraints may not be satisfied if normality is assumed. We address this problem by constructing sequential stopping rules with specified properties by consideration of the exact distribution of test statistics under a particular adaptive allocation scheme, the randomized play-the-winner rule. Using this approach, compared to traditional equal allocation trials, trials with adaptive allocation are shown to require a larger total sample size to achieve a given power. More interestingly, the expected number patients allocated to the inferior treatment may also be larger for the adaptive allocation designs depending on the true success rates.

[1]  D. DeMets,et al.  Exact statistical inference for group sequential trials. , 1991, Biometrics.

[2]  C. F. Wu,et al.  Efficient Sequential Designs with Binary Data , 1985 .

[3]  S Todd,et al.  Exact sequential tests for single samples of discrete responses using spending functions. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  R. G. Cornell,et al.  Extracorporeal circulation in neonatal respiratory failure: a prospective randomized study. , 1985, Pediatrics.

[5]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  New directions in adaptive designs , 1996 .

[6]  Robert H. Bartlett,et al.  Randomized play the winner clinical trials , 1986 .

[7]  Connie Page,et al.  Variability in Adaptive Designs for Estimation of Success Probabilities , 1998 .

[8]  Thomas A. Louis,et al.  Sequential treatment allocation in clinical trials , 1971 .

[9]  Douglas E. Faries,et al.  A Case Study of an Adaptive Clinical Trial in the Treatment of Out-Patients with Depressive Disorder , 1994 .

[10]  P. O'Brien,et al.  A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. , 1979, Biometrics.

[11]  Eric V. Slud,et al.  Two-Sample Repeated Significance Tests Based on the Modified Wilcoxon Statistic , 1982 .

[12]  Christopher Jennison,et al.  Optimal Properties of the Bechhofer-Kulkarni Bernoulli Selection Procedure , 1986 .

[13]  W F Rosenberger,et al.  Adaptive survival trials. , 1997, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[14]  L. J. Wei,et al.  Statistical Inference with Data-Dependent Treatment Allocation Rules , 1990 .

[15]  K. K. Lan,et al.  Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials , 1983 .

[16]  T. W. Anderson A MODIFICATION OF THE SEQUENTIAL PROBABILITY RATIO TEST TO REDUCE THE SAMPLE SIZE , 1960 .

[17]  L. J. Wei,et al.  The Randomized Play-the-Winner Rule in Medical Trials , 1978 .

[18]  J. Andersen,et al.  Clinical trial designs--made to order. , 1996, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[19]  B. Turnbull,et al.  Group Sequential Methods with Applications to Clinical Trials , 1999 .

[20]  W F Rosenberger,et al.  Randomized play-the-winner clinical trials: review and recommendations. , 1999, Controlled clinical trials.

[21]  W F Rosenberger,et al.  A COMPARISON OF URN DESIGNS FOR RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS OF K > 2 TREATMENTS , 2000, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[22]  N Stallard,et al.  Comparison of the spending function method and the Christmas tree correction for group sequential trials. , 1996, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[23]  H. Robbins,et al.  Sequential Tests Involving Two Populations , 1974 .

[24]  D S Coad,et al.  A comparison of the randomized play-the-winner rule and the triangular test for clinical trials with binary responses. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[25]  Lee-Jen Wei,et al.  Play the winner for phase II/III clinical trials. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[26]  C. Rout,et al.  A Reevaluation of the Role of Crystalloid Preload in the Prevention of Hypotension Associated with Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Section , 1993, Anesthesiology.

[27]  David L. DeMets,et al.  Design and analysis of group sequential tests based on the type I error spending rate function , 1987 .