Simulation of the solution structure of the H-ras p21-GTP complex.

An unconstrained simulation of the GTP-bound form of the H-ras protein p21 is performed in an aqueous environment with charge-neutralizing counterions. The simulation is compared to the 1.35-A structure of Pai et al. [(1990) EMBO J. 9, 2351] and a proposed alternate structure, in which the loop at residues 60-65 is modeled into a form which may activate a water molecule for the GTP hydrolysis. The simulation suggests that some protein intermolecular H-bond contacts which are present in the crystal structure are lost in the solvation process and this loss may lead to localized refolding of the molecule. For instance, we find that the gamma-phosphate of the GTP has somewhat weaker contact with the protein in the simulation structure. The antiparallel beta-sheet (residues 38-57) partially melts. The 60-65 loop, which is hypervariable in the X-ray study, is initially relatively distant from the gamma-phosphate region. However, this loop moves so as to sample the space around the gamma-phosphate. For a significant fraction of the simulation time, forms similar to the alternate structure are observed, and a water molecule is localized near the hydrolytic site. The molecular dynamics simulations of p21-GTP in solution support a postulated hydrolysis mechanism for the biological inactivation of the nucleotide complex based on crystallographic data.

[1]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Structure of the guanine-nucleotide-binding domain of the Ha-ras oncogene product p21 in the triphosphate conformation , 1989, Nature.

[2]  W. Kabsch.  A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors , 1978 .

[3]  D. Lowy,et al.  Guanosine triphosphatase activating protein (GAP) interacts with the p21 ras effector binding domain. , 1988, Science.

[4]  S H Kim,et al.  Molecular switch for signal transduction: structural differences between active and inactive forms of protooncogenic ras proteins. , 1992, Science.

[5]  I. Schlichting,et al.  Biochemical and crystallographic characterization of a complex of c-Ha-ras p21 and caged GTP with flash photolysis. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Frank McCormick,et al.  The GTPase superfamily: conserved structure and molecular mechanism , 1991, Nature.

[7]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Simulations of Proteins in Water a , 1986, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Irving S. Sigal,et al.  Cloning of bovine GAP and its interaction with oncogenic ras p21 , 1988, Nature.

[9]  F. McCormick,et al.  Differential regulation of rasGAP and neurofibromatosis gene product activities , 1991, Nature.

[10]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[11]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[12]  Andersen,et al.  10(6)-particle molecular-dynamics study of homogeneous nucleation of crystals in a supercooled atomic liquid. , 1990, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[13]  David J Weber,et al.  Diverse interactions between the individual mutations in a double mutant at the active site of staphylococcal nuclease. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[14]  U. Singh,et al.  A NEW FORCE FIELD FOR MOLECULAR MECHANICAL SIMULATION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS AND PROTEINS , 1984 .

[15]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Crystal structure of interleukin 8: symbiosis of NMR and crystallography. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Bernard Pettitt,et al.  Peptides in ionic solutions: A comparison of the Ewald and switching function techniques , 1991 .

[17]  A Valencia,et al.  The ras protein family: evolutionary tree and role of conserved amino acids. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[18]  T Darden,et al.  MULTI: a shared memory approach to cooperative molecular modeling. , 1991, Journal of molecular graphics.

[19]  B. Brooks,et al.  The effects of truncating long‐range forces on protein dynamics , 1989, Proteins.

[20]  L. E. Chirlian,et al.  Atomic charges derived from electrostatic potentials: A detailed study , 1987 .

[21]  W. Kabsch.  A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors , 1976 .

[22]  A. Bax,et al.  Two-dimensional NMR and protein structure. , 1989, Annual review of biochemistry.

[23]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Refined crystal structure of the triphosphate conformation of H‐ras p21 at 1.35 A resolution: implications for the mechanism of GTP hydrolysis. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[24]  S. Yokoyama,et al.  Conformation change of effector-region residues in antiparallel β-sheet of human c-Ha-ras protein on GDP→GTPγS exchange: A two-dimensional NMR study , 1989 .

[25]  P. Kollman,et al.  An all atom force field for simulations of proteins and nucleic acids , 1986, Journal of computational chemistry.

[26]  R. Sharon,et al.  Accurate simulation of protein dynamics in solution. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  R. Weinberg,et al.  Identification of a nucleotide exchange-promoting activity for p21ras. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  J B Gibbs,et al.  Purification of ras GTPase activating protein from bovine brain. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[30]  Steven C. Almo,et al.  Time-resolved X-ray crystallographic study of the conformational change in Ha-Ras p21 protein on GTP hydrolysis , 1990, Nature.