Geocoding and Evaluation of Large Scale Imagery without GPS

Large scale imagery will be increasingly available due to the low cost of video cameras and unmanned aerial vehicles. Their use is broad: the documentation of traffic accidents, the effects of thunderstorms onto agricultural farms, the 3Dstructure of industrial plants or the monitoring of archeological excavation. The value of imagery depends on the availability of (1) information about the place and date during data capture, (2) of information about the 3D-structure of the object and (3) of information about the class or identity of the objects in the scene. Geocoding, problem (1), usually relies the availability of GPS-information, which however limits the use of imagery to outdoor applications. The paper discusses methods for geocoding and geometrical evaluation of such imagery and especially adresses the question in how far the methods can do without GPS.

[1]  E. M. Mikhail,et al.  Rectification of single and multiple frames of satellite scanner imagery using points and edges as control , 1984 .

[2]  Ian Dowman INTEGRATING PHOTOGRAMMETRIC TECHNIQUES WITH SCENE ANALYSIS AND MACHINE VISION , 1993 .

[3]  Edward M. Mikhail Linear features for photogrammetric restitution and object completion , 1993, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[4]  Walter J. Mueller,et al.  Feature entity least squares matching: a technique for the automatic control of imagery , 1995, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[5]  Karl Rohr,et al.  Exterior orientation — an automatic approach based on fitting analytic landmark models , 1997 .

[6]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Bundle Adjustment - A Modern Synthesis , 1999, Workshop on Vision Algorithms.

[7]  D. Scharstein,et al.  A Taxonomy and Evaluation of Dense Two-Frame Stereo Correspondence Algorithms , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Stereo and Multi-Baseline Vision (SMBV 2001).

[8]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[9]  Andrew J. Davison,et al.  Real-time simultaneous localisation and mapping with a single camera , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[10]  Manolis I. A. Lourakis,et al.  The design and implementation of a generic sparse bundle adjustment software package based on the Le , 2004 .

[11]  G LoweDavid,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004 .

[12]  A. Habib,et al.  LINEAR FEATURES IN PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ACTIVITIES , 2004 .

[13]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  A Taxonomy and Evaluation of Dense Two-Frame Stereo Correspondence Algorithms , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[14]  Reinhard Klein,et al.  Correspondences between Salient Points on 3D Shapes , 2006 .

[15]  Christian Beder,et al.  Determining an Initial Image Pair for Fixing the Scale of a 3D Reconstruction from an Image Sequence , 2006, DAGM-Symposium.

[16]  Javier Civera,et al.  Unified Inverse Depth Parametrization for Monocular SLAM , 2006, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[17]  H. Mayer,et al.  3D LEAST-SQUARES-BASED SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION , 2007 .

[18]  EFFICIENT SEMI-GLOBAL MATCHING FOR TRINOCULAR STEREO , 2007 .

[19]  Christian Beder,et al.  Recursive Estimation with Implicit Constraints , 2007, DAGM-Symposium.