Personalized prediction of tumor response and cancer progression on prostate needle biopsy.

PURPOSE To our knowledge in patients with prostate cancer there are no available tests except clinical variables to determine the likelihood of disease progression. We developed a patient specific, biology driven tool to predict outcome at diagnosis. We also investigated whether biopsy androgen receptor levels predict a durable response to therapy after secondary treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated paraffin embedded prostate needle biopsy tissue from 1,027 patients with cT1c-T3 prostate cancer treated with surgery and followed a median of 8 years. Machine learning was done to integrate clinical data with biopsy quantitative biometric features. Multivariate models were constructed to predict disease progression with the C index to estimate performance. RESULTS In a training set of 686 patients (total of 87 progression events) 3 clinical and 3 biopsy tissue characteristics were identified to predict clinical progression within 8 years after prostatectomy with 78% sensitivity, 69% specificity, a C index of 0.74 and a HR of 5.12. Validation in an independent cohort of 341 patients (total of 44 progression events) yielded 76% sensitivity, 64% specificity, a C index of 0.73 and a HR of 3.47. Increased androgen receptor in tumor cells in the biopsy highly significantly predicted resistance to therapy, ie androgen ablation with or without salvage radiotherapy, and clinical failure (p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Morphometry reliably classifies Gleason pattern 3 tumors. When combined with biomarker data, it adds to the hematoxylin and eosin analysis, and prostate specific antigen values currently used to assess outcome at diagnosis. Biopsy androgen receptor levels predict the likelihood of a response to therapy after recurrence and may guide future treatment decisions.

[1]  Gerardo Fernandez,et al.  Systems pathology approach for the prediction of prostate cancer progression after radical prostatectomy. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  H. Moch,et al.  Ki67 labeling index in core needle biopsies independently predicts tumor-specific survival in prostate cancer. , 1998, Human pathology.

[3]  L. Klotz,et al.  Active surveillance versus radical treatment for favorable-risk localized prostate cancer , 2006, Current treatment options in oncology.

[4]  F. Bianco Paradigms in androgen/castrate resistant states of prostate cancer in a biomarker era. , 2008, Urologic oncology.

[5]  Hans Garmo,et al.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Alan W Partin,et al.  Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2005, JAMA.

[7]  A. Evans,et al.  Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors. , 2004, The Canadian journal of urology.

[8]  P. Carroll,et al.  20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer , 2005 .

[9]  Alan W Partin,et al.  Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005. , 2007, Urology.

[10]  M. Hammond,et al.  Ki-67 staining is a strong predictor of distant metastasis and mortality for men with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 92-02. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Ruth Etzioni,et al.  Estimating Lead Time and Overdiagnosis Associated with PSA Screening from Prostate Cancer Incidence Trends , 2008, Biometrics.

[12]  K. Pienta,et al.  Expression of nuclear antigen Ki-67 in prostate cancer needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  Yu-Kang Tu,et al.  Simpson's Paradox, Lord's Paradox, and Suppression Effects are the same phenomenon – the reversal paradox , 2008, Emerging themes in epidemiology.

[14]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Phosphorylation of the androgen receptor is associated with reduced survival in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients , 2008, British Journal of Cancer.

[15]  Juni Palmgren,et al.  A randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  J. Meuwly,et al.  [Active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer]. , 2009, Revue medicale suisse.

[17]  M. Kattan,et al.  Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2008 , 2008, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[19]  Review of current literature , 1993, International Urogynecology Journal.

[20]  Mikhail Teverovskiy,et al.  Improved prediction of prostate cancer recurrence through systems pathology. , 2007, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[21]  J. Kreisberg,et al.  Cross-talk between the androgen receptor and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway in prostate cancer. , 2007, Current cancer drug targets.

[22]  P. Lipponen,et al.  Expression of Ki-67, cyclin D1 and apoptosis markers correlated with survival in prostate cancer patients treated by radical prostatectomy. , 2006, Anticancer research.

[23]  M. Barry,et al.  Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Case 15-2008. A 55-year-old man with an elevated prostate-specific antigen level and early-stage prostate cancer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  N. Kinukawa,et al.  Increased Akt and phosphorylated Akt expression are associated with malignant biological features of prostate cancer in Japanese men , 2007, BJU international.

[25]  J. Hugosson,et al.  Is tumor vascularity in prostate core biopsies a predictor of PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy? , 2005, Acta oncologica.

[26]  M. Kattan,et al.  A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  B. Trock,et al.  Relationship between primary Gleason pattern on needle biopsy and clinicopathologic outcomes among men with Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate. , 2006, Urology.

[28]  Donald E Bailey,et al.  Active surveillance for early‐stage prostate cancer , 2008, Cancer.

[29]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Syntactic structure analysis in invasive breast cancer: analysis of reproducibility, biologic background, and prognostic value. , 1992, Human pathology.

[30]  Kevin Regan,et al.  Nomogram for overall survival of patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer after castration. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  Michael J. Barry,et al.  Case 15-2008 , 2009 .

[32]  Alan W Partin,et al.  Prognostic significance of Gleason score discrepancies between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy. , 2008, European urology.