Probing cellular response to topography in three dimensions.

Biophysical aspects of in vivo tissue microenvironments include microscale mechanical properties, fibrillar alignment, and architecture or topography of the extracellular matrix (ECM). These aspects act in concert with chemical signals from a myriad of diverse ECM proteins to provide cues that drive cellular responses. Here, we used a bottom-up approach to build fibrillar architecture into 3D amorphous hydrogels using magnetic-field driven assembly of paramagnetic colloidal particles functionalized with three types of human ECM proteins found in vivo. We investigated if cells cultured in matrices comprised of fibrils of the same size and arranged in similar geometries will show similar behavior for each of the ECM proteins tested. We were able to resolve spatial heterogeneities in microscale mechanical properties near aligned fibers that were not observed in bulk tissue mechanics. We then used this platform to examine factors contributing to cell alignment in response to topographical cues in 3D laminin-rich matrices. Multiple human cell lines extended protrusions preferentially in directions parallel or perpendicular to aligned fibers independently of the ECM coating. Focal adhesion proteins, as measured by paxillin localization, were mainly diffuse in the cytoplasm, with few puncta localized at the protrusions. Integrin β1 and fascin regulated protrusion extension but not protrusion alignment. Myosin II inhibition did not reduce observed protrusion length. Instead, cells with reduced myosin II activity generated protrusions in random orientations when cultured in hydrogels with aligned fibers. Similarly, myosin II dependence was observed in vivo, where cells no longer aligned along the abluminal surfaces of blood vessels upon treatment with blebbistatin. These data suggest that myosin II can regulate sensing of topography in 3D engineered matrices for both normal and transformed cells.

[1]  Paolo P. Provenzano,et al.  Collagen reorganization at the tumor-stromal interface facilitates local invasion , 2006, BMC medicine.

[2]  K. Neuman,et al.  Optical trapping. , 2004, The Review of scientific instruments.

[3]  Guanqing Ou,et al.  Tissue mechanics modulate microRNA-dependent PTEN expression to regulate malignant progression , 2014, Nature Medicine.

[4]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.

[5]  Robert S. Adelstein,et al.  Local Cortical Tension by Myosin II Guides 3D Endothelial Cell Branching , 2009, Current Biology.

[6]  K. Tanner,et al.  In situ calibration of position detection in an optical trap for active microrheology in viscous materials. , 2017, Optics express.

[7]  David J Beebe,et al.  Microfluidic model of ductal carcinoma in situ with 3D, organotypic structure , 2015, BMC Cancer.

[8]  Jochen Herms,et al.  Real-time imaging reveals the single steps of brain metastasis formation , 2010, Nature Medicine.

[9]  R. Chiquet‐Ehrismann,et al.  Tenascin-C induced signaling in cancer. , 2006, Cancer letters.

[10]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Mechanical forces regulate the interactions of fibronectin and collagen I in extracellular matrix , 2015, Nature Communications.

[11]  M. Gottesman,et al.  Beyond 3D culture models of cancer , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[12]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Independent regulation of tumor cell migration by matrix stiffness and confinement , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Frank P T Baaijens,et al.  Heading in the Right Direction: Understanding Cellular Orientation Responses to Complex Biophysical Environments , 2015, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[14]  K. Tanner Regulation of the basement membrane by epithelia generated forces , 2012, Physical biology.

[15]  A. Levchenko,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of the Combined Effect of Substrate Rigidity and Topographic Guidance on Cell Morphology , 2012, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[16]  Matthew J. Paszek,et al.  Balancing forces: architectural control of mechanotransduction , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[17]  Z. Werb,et al.  The extracellular matrix: A dynamic niche in cancer progression , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  David J Mooney,et al.  Extracellular matrix stiffness and composition jointly regulate the induction of malignant phenotypes in mammary epithelium. , 2014, Nature materials.

[19]  Jacco van Rheenen,et al.  Collagen-based cell migration models in vitro and in vivo. , 2009, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[20]  Carlos Cuevas,et al.  Enzymatic targeting of the stroma ablates physical barriers to treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. , 2012, Cancer cell.

[21]  Ronald N Germain,et al.  Stromal cell networks regulate lymphocyte entry, migration, and territoriality in lymph nodes. , 2006, Immunity.

[22]  Mikala Egeblad,et al.  Matrix Crosslinking Forces Tumor Progression by Enhancing Integrin Signaling , 2009, Cell.

[23]  Valerie M. Weaver,et al.  Microenvironment rigidity modulates responses to the HER2 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib via YAP and TAZ transcription factors , 2015, Molecular biology of the cell.

[24]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Molecular architecture and function of matrix adhesions. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[25]  Miguel Vicente-Manzanares,et al.  Non-muscle myosin II takes centre stage in cell adhesion and migration , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[26]  K. Tanner,et al.  In vivo tissue has non-linear rheological behavior distinct from 3D biomimetic hydrogels, as determined by AMOTIV microscopy. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[27]  K. Tanner,et al.  Mechanical Properties of the Tumor Stromal Microenvironment Probed In Vitro and Ex Vivo by In Situ-Calibrated Optical Trap-Based Active Microrheology , 2016, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[28]  Mina J. Bissell,et al.  Tissue architecture and function: dynamic reciprocity via extra- and intra-cellular matrices , 2009, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[29]  Pierre Validire,et al.  Matrix architecture defines the preferential localization and migration of T cells into the stroma of human lung tumors. , 2012, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[30]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Engineered Models of Confined Cell Migration. , 2016, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[31]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Particle-tracking microrheology of living cells: principles and applications. , 2009, Annual review of biophysics.

[32]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  Christopher Beadle,et al.  The role of myosin II in glioma invasion of the brain. , 2008, Molecular biology of the cell.

[34]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  Fibroblasts probe substrate rigidity with filopodia extensions before occupying an area , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[36]  J. Schwarzbauer,et al.  Meet the Tenascins: Multifunctional and Mysterious* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  Mario Fischer,et al.  Calibration of trapping force and response function of optical tweezers in viscoelastic media , 2007 .

[38]  S. Kornbluth,et al.  The Trim39 ubiquitin ligase inhibits APC/CCdh1-mediated degradation of the Bax activator MOAP-1. , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[39]  N. Fusenig,et al.  Tumor-associated fibroblasts and their matrix , 2011 .

[40]  Jiyun Kim,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Patterning of the ECM Microenvironment Using Magnetic Nanoparticle Self Assembly , 2016, Current protocols in cell biology.

[41]  Paolo P. Provenzano,et al.  Engineering Three‐Dimensional Collagen Matrices to Provide Contact Guidance during 3D Cell Migration , 2010, Current protocols in cell biology.

[42]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[43]  D. Discher,et al.  Stem cells, microenvironment mechanics, and growth factor activation. , 2009, Current opinion in cell biology.

[44]  Luke P. Lee,et al.  Microfluidic alignment of collagen fibers for in vitro cell culture , 2006, Biomedical microdevices.

[45]  N. Sibson,et al.  The Vascular Basement Membrane as “Soil” in Brain Metastasis , 2009, PloS one.

[46]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Mechanics, malignancy, and metastasis: The force journey of a tumor cell , 2009, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[47]  Peter Canoll,et al.  Transplanted glioma cells migrate and proliferate on host brain vasculature: A dynamic analysis , 2006, Glia.

[48]  J. Humphrey Vascular Adaptation and Mechanical Homeostasis at Tissue, Cellular, and Sub-cellular Levels , 2007, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[49]  Paolo P. Provenzano,et al.  Aligned Collagen Is a Prognostic Signature for Survival in Human Breast Carcinoma Address Reprint Requests to See Related Commentary on Page 966 , 2022 .

[50]  Paolo P. Provenzano,et al.  Bimodal sensing of guidance cues in mechanically distinct microenvironments , 2018, Nature Communications.

[51]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion , 2005, Journal of cellular physiology.

[52]  Albert Jin,et al.  Local 3D matrix microenvironment regulates cell migration through spatiotemporal dynamics of contractility-dependent adhesions , 2015, Nature Communications.

[53]  D. Doyle,et al.  Structural changes during ion channel gating , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[54]  D. Fletcher,et al.  Patterned Collagen Fibers Orient Branching Mammary Epithelium through Distinct Signaling Modules , 2013, Current Biology.

[55]  B. Weinstein,et al.  In vivo imaging of embryonic vascular development using transgenic zebrafish. , 2002, Developmental biology.

[56]  Konstantinos Konstantopoulos,et al.  Cancer cell motility: lessons from migration in confined spaces , 2016, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[57]  Robert M. Hoffman,et al.  Physical limits of cell migration: Control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force , 2013, The Journal of cell biology.

[58]  M. Zaman,et al.  The biomechanical integrin. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[59]  J. Lahann,et al.  Physical aspects of cell culture substrates: topography, roughness, and elasticity. , 2012, Small.

[60]  Shawn P. Carey,et al.  Local extracellular matrix alignment directs cellular protrusion dynamics and migration through Rac1 and FAK. , 2016, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[61]  Patrick W. Oakes,et al.  Contact guidance requires spatial control of leading-edge protrusion , 2017, Molecular biology of the cell.

[62]  Stephanie Alexander,et al.  Cancer Invasion and the Microenvironment: Plasticity and Reciprocity , 2011, Cell.

[63]  K. Konstantopoulos,et al.  Interplay of the physical microenvironment, contact guidance, and intracellular signaling in cell decision making , 2016, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[64]  E. Boddeke,et al.  Immune cell dynamics in the CNS: Learning from the zebrafish , 2015, Glia.

[65]  Jiyun Kim,et al.  Independent Control of Topography for 3D Patterning of the ECM Microenvironment , 2015, Advanced materials.

[66]  Yuming Liu,et al.  Methods for Quantifying Fibrillar Collagen Alignment. , 2017, Methods in molecular biology.

[67]  J. Schwarzbauer,et al.  Fibronectin fibrillogenesis, a cell-mediated matrix assembly process. , 2005, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[68]  C. Reinhart-King,et al.  Targeted inhibition of fascin function blocks tumour invasion and metastatic colonization , 2015, Nature Communications.

[69]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Control of cell morphology and differentiation by substrates with independently tunable elasticity and viscous dissipation , 2018, Nature Communications.

[70]  Jiyun Kim,et al.  Recapitulating the Tumor Ecosystem Along the Metastatic Cascade Using 3D Culture Models , 2015, Front. Oncol..