Modelling continual learning in humans with Hebbian context gating and exponentially decaying task signals
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Xiao-Jing Wang,et al. Geometry of sequence working memory in macaque prefrontal cortex , 2022, Science.
[2] Seongmin A. Park,et al. A Neural Network Model of Continual Learning with Cognitive Control , 2022, CogSci ... Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society (U.S.). Conference.
[3] Justin L. Gardner,et al. Texture-like representation of objects in human visual cortex , 2022, bioRxiv.
[4] Andrew M. Saxe,et al. Orthogonal representations for robust context-dependent task performance in brains and neural networks , 2022, Neuron.
[5] Lucas O. Souza,et al. Avoiding Catastrophe: Active Dendrites Enable Multi-Task Learning in Dynamic Environments , 2021, Frontiers in Neurorobotics.
[6] Takuya Ito,et al. Multi-task representations in human cortex transform along a sensory-to-motor hierarchy , 2021, bioRxiv.
[7] Steven C. Pan,et al. Interleaved practice enhances memory and problem-solving ability in undergraduate physics , 2021, npj Science of Learning.
[8] Subutai Ahmad,et al. Going Beyond the Point Neuron: Active Dendrites and Sparse Representations for Continual Learning , 2021, bioRxiv.
[9] Andrew M. Saxe,et al. Continual Learning in the Teacher-Student Setup: Impact of Task Similarity , 2021, ICML.
[10] T. Verguts,et al. Using top-down modulation to optimally balance shared versus separated task representations , 2021, bioRxiv.
[11] Matthew F. Panichello,et al. Shared mechanisms underlie the control of working memory and attention , 2021, Nature.
[12] Sebastian Musslick,et al. Rationalizing constraints on the capacity for cognitive control , 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[13] Andrew M. Saxe,et al. On the Rational Boundedness of Cognitive Control: Shared Versus Separated Representations , 2020 .
[14] Andrew M. Saxe,et al. If deep learning is the answer, what is the question? , 2020, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[15] Andrei A. Rusu,et al. Embracing Change: Continual Learning in Deep Neural Networks , 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[16] Philip H. S. Torr,et al. Continual Learning in Low-rank Orthogonal Subspaces , 2020, NeurIPS.
[17] Hava T. Siegelmann,et al. Brain-inspired replay for continual learning with artificial neural networks , 2020, Nature Communications.
[18] Ethan Dyer,et al. Anatomy of Catastrophic Forgetting: Hidden Representations and Task Semantics , 2020, ICLR.
[19] Benjamin F. Grewe,et al. Continual learning in recurrent neural networks , 2020, ICLR.
[20] Michael C. Frank,et al. Unsupervised neural network models of the ventral visual stream , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[21] David Badre,et al. The dimensionality of neural representations for control , 2020, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.
[22] Hava T. Siegelmann,et al. A modeling framework for adaptive lifelong learning with transfer and savings through gating in the prefrontal cortex , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[23] Grace W. Lindsay. Convolutional Neural Networks as a Model of the Visual System: Past, Present, and Future , 2020, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[24] Mehrdad Farajtabar,et al. Orthogonal Gradient Descent for Continual Learning , 2019, AISTATS.
[25] Surya Ganguli,et al. A deep learning framework for neuroscience , 2019, Nature Neuroscience.
[26] Michael J. Frank,et al. Generalizing to generalize: Humans flexibly switch between compositional and conjunctive structures during reinforcement learning , 2019, bioRxiv.
[27] Alexandra Libby,et al. Rotational Dynamics Reduce Interference Between Sensory and Memory Representations , 2019, Nature Neuroscience.
[28] Madhura R. Joglekar,et al. Task representations in neural networks trained to perform many cognitive tasks , 2019, Nature Neuroscience.
[29] Praneeth Namburi,et al. Dopamine enhances signal-to-noise ratio in cortical-brainstem encoding of aversive stimuli , 2018, Nature.
[30] Christopher Summerfield,et al. Comparing continual task learning in minds and machines , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[31] Michael M. Halassa,et al. Thalamic regulation of switching between cortical representations enables cognitive flexibility , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.
[32] Shan Yu,et al. Continual learning of context-dependent processing in neural networks , 2018, Nature Machine Intelligence.
[33] Stefan Wermter,et al. Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Review , 2018, Neural Networks.
[34] Murray Shanahan,et al. Continual Reinforcement Learning with Complex Synapses , 2018, ICML.
[35] Nicolas Y. Masse,et al. Alleviating catastrophic forgetting using context-dependent gating and synaptic stabilization , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[36] Alexandros Karatzoglou,et al. Overcoming catastrophic forgetting with hard attention to the task , 2018, ICML.
[37] Jiwon Kim,et al. Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replay , 2017, NIPS.
[38] Surya Ganguli,et al. Continual Learning Through Synaptic Intelligence , 2017, ICML.
[39] Andrei A. Rusu,et al. Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[40] Stefano Fusi,et al. Computational principles of synaptic memory consolidation , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.
[41] Razvan Pascanu,et al. Progressive Neural Networks , 2016, ArXiv.
[42] Xuanjing Huang,et al. Recurrent Neural Network for Text Classification with Multi-Task Learning , 2016, IJCAI.
[43] Robert L. Goldstone,et al. What you learn is more than what you see: what can sequencing effects tell us about inductive category learning? , 2015, Front. Psychol..
[44] Shane Legg,et al. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning , 2015, Nature.
[45] Marcel A. J. van Gerven,et al. Deep Neural Networks Reveal a Gradient in the Complexity of Neural Representations across the Ventral Stream , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[46] Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al. Deep Supervised, but Not Unsupervised, Models May Explain IT Cortical Representation , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[47] Seth A. Herd,et al. A neural network model of individual differences in task switching abilities , 2014, Neuropsychologia.
[48] Ha Hong,et al. Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[49] Robert L. Goldstone,et al. Putting category learning in order: Category structure and temporal arrangement affect the benefit of interleaved over blocked study , 2014, Memory & cognition.
[50] W. Newsome,et al. Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex , 2013, Nature.
[51] Mounir Boukadoum,et al. Mechanisms Gating the Flow of Information in the Cortex: What They Might Look Like and What Their Uses may be , 2010, Front. Comput. Neurosci..
[52] O. Jensen,et al. Shaping Functional Architecture by Oscillatory Alpha Activity: Gating by Inhibition , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[53] Jonathan D. Cohen,et al. Sequential effects: Superstition or rational behavior? , 2008, NIPS.
[54] K. Johnston,et al. Top-Down Control-Signal Dynamics in Anterior Cingulate and Prefrontal Cortex Neurons following Task Switching , 2007, Neuron.
[55] Keiji Tanaka,et al. Prefrontal Cell Activities Related to Monkeys' Success and Failure in Adapting to Rule Changes in a Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Analog , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[56] Michael J. Frank,et al. Making Working Memory Work: A Computational Model of Learning in the Prefrontal Cortex and Basal Ganglia , 2006, Neural Computation.
[57] Bradley R. Postle,et al. Delay-period Activity in the Prefrontal Cortex: One Function Is Sensory Gating , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[58] Jonathan D. Cohen,et al. Prefrontal cortex and flexible cognitive control: rules without symbols. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[59] K. Berman,et al. Meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies of the Wisconsin Card‐Sorting task and component processes , 2005, Human brain mapping.
[60] S. Monsell. Task switching , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[61] Jonathan D. Cohen,et al. Mechanisms underlying dependencies of performance on stimulus history in a two-alternative forced-choice task , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[62] C. Shea,et al. Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[63] R. French. Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[64] James L. McClelland,et al. Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.
[65] J D Cohen,et al. A network model of catecholamine effects: gain, signal-to-noise ratio, and behavior. , 1990, Science.
[66] James L. McClelland,et al. On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.
[67] E. Soetens,et al. Expectancy or Automatic Facilitation? Separating Sequential Effects in Two-Choice Reaction Time , 1985 .
[68] E. Oja,et al. On stochastic approximation of the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the expectation of a random matrix , 1985 .
[69] Maneesh Sahani,et al. Organizing recurrent network dynamics by task-computation to enable continual learning , 2020, NeurIPS.
[70] Qiang Yang,et al. An Overview of Multi-task Learning , 2018 .
[71] Doug Rohrer,et al. Interleaved Practice Improves Mathematics Learning. , 2014 .
[72] E. Miller,et al. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.
[73] E. Oja. Simplified neuron model as a principal component analyzer , 1982, Journal of mathematical biology.