Unleashing or domesticating the vitality of citizens' initiatives? The paradoxical relationship between governments and citizens' initiatives in the energy transition
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Arwin van Buuren,et al. The Social Production of Invited Spaces: Toward an Understanding of the Invitational Character of Spaces for Citizens’ Initiatives , 2021, VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations.
[2] J. Edelenbos,et al. What explains the performance of community-based initiatives? Testing the impact of leadership, social capital, organizational capacity, and government support , 2020, Public Management Review.
[3] Helene Joffe,et al. Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines , 2020 .
[4] G. Aiken. Community as tool for low carbon transitions: Involvement and containment, policy and action: , 2019 .
[5] J. Edelenbos,et al. Community-based initiatives in the Dutch water domain: the challenge of double helix alignment , 2019, International Journal of Water Resources Development.
[6] S. Grotenbreg,et al. The U-Turn in Government Facilitation: How Dutch Water Authorities Facilitate Nongovernmental Initiatives , 2019, Public Works Management & Policy.
[7] P. Dekker. From Pillarized Active Membership to Populist Active Citizenship: The Dutch Do Democracy , 2019 .
[8] E. Klijn,et al. The governance of self-organization: Which governance strategy do policy officials and citizens prefer? , 2018, Policy Sciences.
[9] Jitske van Popering-Verkerk,et al. Integrated Public Value Creation through Community Initiatives—Evidence from Dutch Water Management , 2018, Social Sciences.
[10] Melanie M. Bakema,et al. Analyzing the Social Lead-Up to a Human-Induced Disaster: The Gas Extraction-Earthquake Nexus in Groningen, The Netherlands , 2018, Sustainability.
[11] M. Hisschemöller,et al. Transition without Conflict? Renewable Energy Initiatives in the Dutch Energy Transition , 2018 .
[12] Eefje Cuppen,et al. The value of social conflicts. Critiquing invited participation in energy projects , 2018 .
[13] M. Hasanov,et al. The transformative power of self-organization: Towards a conceptual framework for understanding local energy initiatives in The Netherlands , 2018 .
[14] Jacob Torfing,et al. Co-initiation of Collaborative Innovation in Urban Spaces , 2018 .
[15] N. Verloo. Learning from informality? Rethinking the mismatch between formal policy strategies and informal tactics of citizenship , 2017 .
[16] G. Aiken. Prosaic state governance of community low carbon transitions , 2016 .
[17] P. Chatterton. Building transitions to post-capitalist urban commons , 2016 .
[18] V. Bekkers,et al. Self-Organization and the Role of Government: How and why does self-organization evolve in the shadow of hierarchy? , 2016 .
[19] D. Hawkey,et al. Governing cities for sustainable energy: The UK case , 2016 .
[20] William Eadson. State enrolment and energy-carbon transitions: Syndromic experimentation and atomisation in England , 2016 .
[21] M. Lister. Citizens, Doing It for Themselves?: The Big Society and Government through Community , 2015 .
[22] Tineke van der Schoor,et al. Power to the people: Local community initiatives and the transition to sustainable energy , 2015 .
[23] I. Lammers,et al. Local Governments Supporting Local Energy Initiatives: Lessons from the Best Practices of Saerbeck (Germany) and Lochem (The Netherlands) , 2015 .
[24] P. Klok,et al. Citizens’ Initiatives: How Local Governments Fill their Facilitative Role , 2012 .
[25] Lawrence Pratchett,et al. Local Governance under the Coalition Government: Austerity, Localism and the ‘Big Society’ , 2012 .
[26] Aziz Sheikh,et al. The case study approach , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.
[27] L. Middlemiss. The Power of Community: How Community-Based Organizations Stimulate Sustainable Lifestyles Among Participants , 2011 .
[28] B. Kisby,et al. The big society: power to the people? , 2010 .
[29] M. Rosol. Public participation in post-Fordist urban green space governance: the case of community gardens in Berlin. , 2010, International journal of urban and regional research.
[30] John Gaventa,et al. Finding the Spaces for Change: A Power Analysis , 2006 .
[31] Glenn A. Bowen. Grounded Theory and Sensitizing Concepts , 2006 .
[32] B. Flyvbjerg. Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.
[33] J. Clarke. New Labour’s citizens: activated, empowered, responsibilized, abandoned? , 2005 .
[34] E. Swyngedouw. Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State , 2005 .
[35] Marilyn Taylor,et al. Community Participation in the Real World: Opportunities and Pitfalls in New Governance Spaces , 2005 .
[36] Celia Lury,et al. Inventive Life , 2005 .
[37] J. Gerring. What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for? , 2004, American Political Science Review.
[38] Andrea Cornwall. Introduction: New Democratic Spaces? The Politics and Dynamics of Institutionalised Participation , 2004 .
[39] P. Jones,et al. Urban Regeneration's Poisoned Chalice: Is There an Impasse in (Community) Participation-based Policy? , 2003 .
[40] Andrea Cornwall,et al. From Users and Choosers to Makers and Shapers: Repositioning Participation in Social Policy * , 2000 .
[41] John Morison,et al. Government-Voluntary Sector Compacts: Governance, Governmentality, and Civil Society , 2000 .
[42] K. Eisenhardt. Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.
[43] H. Blumer. What Is Wrong with Social Theory , 1954 .
[44] D. Loorbach,et al. Making the Transition: Transformative Governance Capacities for a Resilient Rotterdam , 2020 .
[45] C. Durose,et al. Governing at arm's length: eroding or enhancing democracy? , 2015 .
[46] M. Rosol. Community Volunteering as Neoliberal Strategy? Green Space Production in Berlin , 2012 .
[47] M. Bevir. Governance and Governmentality after Neoliberalism , 2011 .
[48] Henrik Paul Bang,et al. Among everyday makers and expert citizens , 2005 .
[49] E. Tonkens,et al. Paternalism - caught between rejection and acceptance: taking care and taking control in community work , 2003 .