Erim Report Series Research in Management Methodological Advances in Dea: a Survey and an Application for the Dutch Electricity Sector Bibliographic Data and Classifications

We survey the methodological advances in DEA over the last 25 years and discuss the necessary conditions for a sound empirical application. We hope this survey will contribute to the further dissemination of DEA, the knowledge of its relative strengths and weaknesses, and the tools currently available for exploiting its full potential. Our main points are illustrated by the case of the DEA study used by the regulatory office of the Dutch electricity sector (Dienst Toezicht Elektriciteitswet; Dte) for setting price caps.

[1]  Henry Tulkens,et al.  Mesurer l'efficacité: avec ou sans frontières? , 1999 .

[2]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[3]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions , 1985 .

[4]  J. Chavas On the Theory of the Competitive Firm under Uncertainty When Initial Wealth Is Random , 1985 .

[5]  A. Sandmo On the theory of the competitive firm under price uncertainty , 1971 .

[6]  R. Färe,et al.  The Structure of Technical Efficiency , 1983 .

[7]  M. D. Wilkinson,et al.  Management science , 1989, British Dental Journal.

[8]  R. Färe,et al.  Benefit and Distance Functions , 1996 .

[9]  R. Färe,et al.  Intertemporal Production Frontiers: With Dynamic DEA , 1996 .

[10]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Nonparametric Efficiency Analysis under Price Uncertainty: A First-Order Stochastic Dominance Approach , 2002 .

[11]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models , 1998 .

[12]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Non-parametric tests of returns to scale , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  G. Debreu The Coefficient of Resource Utilization , 1951 .

[14]  R. Just,et al.  Empirical implementation of ex ante cost functions , 1996 .

[15]  T. Roe,et al.  A THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL APPROACH TO THE VALUE OF INFORMATION IN RISKY MARKETS , 1986 .

[16]  B. Efron,et al.  A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and , 1983 .

[17]  John Quiggin,et al.  Cost Functions and Duality for Stochastic Technologies , 1998 .

[18]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Inefficiency and Congestion in Chinese Production Before and after the 1978 Economic Reforms , 1998 .

[19]  John Ruggiero,et al.  Non-discretionary inputs in data envelopment analysis , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  E. Appelbaum Uncertainty and the measurement of productivity , 1991 .

[21]  A. Ullah,et al.  Competitive Firm and the Theory of Input Demand under Price Uncertainty , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  R. Färe,et al.  Profit, Directional Distance Functions, and Nerlovian Efficiency , 1998 .

[23]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis: A Foundation Text with Integrated Software , 2001 .

[24]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Relations between half-space and finitely generated cones in polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models , 1991 .

[25]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Non-parametric analysis of optimizing behavior with measurement error , 1985 .

[26]  Shawna Grosskopf,et al.  The Role of the Reference Technology in Measuring Productive Efficiency , 1986 .

[27]  U. Kohli,et al.  Import Price Uncertainty and the Distribution of Income , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[28]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Measuring the technical efficiency of production , 1978 .

[29]  Rolf Färe,et al.  The relative efficiency of Illinois electric utilities , 1983 .

[30]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  DEA with efficiency classification preserving conditional convexity , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[32]  R. Färe,et al.  Index numbers : essays in honour of Sten Malmquist , 1998 .

[33]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[34]  B. Park,et al.  A NOTE ON THE CONVERGENCE OF NONPARAMETRIC DEA ESTIMATORS FOR PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY SCORES , 1998, Econometric Theory.

[35]  Kenneth C. Land,et al.  Chance‐constrained data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[36]  N. Petersen Data Envelopment Analysis on a Relaxed Set of Assumptions , 1990 .

[37]  Jaap Spronk,et al.  EVALUATING PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE UNDER UNCERTAINTY: COMBINING DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS, MEAN-VARIANCE ANALYSIS, AND MULTI-FACTOR RISK MODELS , 2000 .

[38]  C. Tisdell,et al.  Uncertainty, production, choice, and agency - The state-contingent approach. , 2002 .

[39]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  DEA on relaxed convexity assumptions , 1996 .

[40]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Malmquist Productivity Indexes: A Survey of Theory and Practice , 1998 .

[41]  T. Koopmans Activity analysis of production and allocation : proceedings of a conference , 1952 .

[42]  W. Diewert,et al.  Linear Programming Tests of Regularity Conditions for Production Functions , 1983 .

[43]  Kuo-Ping Chang,et al.  Measuring efficiency with quasiconcave production frontiers , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in DEA: Some Recent Developments , 2001 .

[45]  Paul W. Wilson,et al.  Detecting influential observations in data envelopment analysis , 1995 .

[46]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Testing the Assumptions of Production Theory: A Nonparametric Approach , 1972, Journal of Political Economy.

[47]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Recent developments in dea : the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis , 1990 .

[48]  W. Cooper,et al.  Chance Constrained Programming Formulations for Stochastic Characterizations of Efficiency and Dominance in DEA , 1998 .

[49]  Bernard F. Lamond,et al.  A multiple criteria ranking procedure based on distance between partial preorders , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[50]  O. H. Brownlee,et al.  ACTIVITY ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTION AND ALLOCATION , 1952 .

[51]  Symmetry Restrictions in the Analysis of the Competitive Firm under Price Uncertainty , 1990 .

[52]  R. Banker Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: a statistical foundation , 1993 .

[53]  刀根 薫 A Slacks-Based Measure of Efficiency in DEA(DEA(2)) , 1998 .

[54]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[55]  Léopold Simar,et al.  A general framework for frontier estimation with panel data , 1996 .

[56]  GianCarlo Moschini Production Risk and the Estimation of Ex Ante Cost Functions , 2000 .

[57]  R. Just An Investigation of the Importance of Risk in Farmers' Decisions , 1974 .

[58]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Chapter 13 Satisficing DEA models under chance constraints , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[59]  Thierry Post,et al.  Transconcave data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[60]  S. Grosskopf Statistical inference and nonparametric efficiency: A selective survey , 1996 .

[61]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Non-parametric production analysis in non-competitive environments , 2002, International Journal of Production Economics.

[62]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Nonparametric Efficiency EstimationIn Stochastic Environments , 2002, Oper. Res..

[63]  E. Mammen,et al.  On estimation of monotone and concave frontier functions , 1999 .

[64]  R. Just,et al.  Cost Function Estimation Under Risk Aversion , 1998 .

[65]  Eric J. Bartelsman,et al.  Understanding productivity: lessons from longitudinal microdata , 2000 .

[66]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Measuring economic efficiency with incomplete price information: With an application to European commercial banks , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[67]  John Quiggin,et al.  Uncertainty, Production, Choice, and Agency: The State-Contingent Approach , 2000 .

[68]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[69]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[70]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[71]  Robert M. Thrall,et al.  What Is the Economic Meaning of FDH? , 1999 .

[72]  Measures of Risk Aversion and Comparative Statics of Industry Equilibrium , 1986 .

[73]  Thierry Post,et al.  A quasi-concave DEA model with an application for bank branch performance evaluation , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[74]  C. Lovell,et al.  Stochastic Frontier Analysis: Frontmatter , 2000 .

[75]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming , 1989 .

[76]  Susan X. Li Stochastic models and variable returns to scales in data envelopment analysis , 1998 .

[77]  R. Färe,et al.  Measuring congestion in production , 1983 .

[78]  S. Afriat Efficiency Estimation of Production Function , 1972 .

[79]  T. Negishi Monopolistic Competition and General Equilibrium , 1961 .

[80]  R. Banker,et al.  NONPARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF TECHNICAL AND ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCIES IN PRODUCTION , 1988 .

[81]  John D. Hey,et al.  Uncertainty in Microeconomics , 1968 .

[82]  R. Färe,et al.  Congestion of Production Factors , 1980 .

[83]  Francisco Pedraja-Chaparro,et al.  On the Role of Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997 .

[84]  A. Charnes,et al.  SENSITIVITY OF EFFICIENCY CLASSIFICATIONS IN THE ADDITIVE MODEL OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1992 .

[85]  M. J. Farrell,et al.  The Convexity Assumption in the Theory of Competitive Markets , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[86]  Thierry Post,et al.  Estimating non-convex production sets - imposing convex input sets and output sets in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[87]  Thierry Post,et al.  Performance Evaluation in Stochastic Environments Using Mean-Variance Data Envelopment Analysis , 2001, Oper. Res..

[88]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Survey and Directions for Future Research , 1997 .

[89]  R. R. Russell,et al.  Measures of technical efficiency , 1985 .

[90]  Henry Tulkens,et al.  On FDH efficiency analysis: Some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit , 1993 .

[91]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  FDH Directional Distance Functions with an Application to European Commercial Banks , 2001 .

[92]  A. Ullah,et al.  Estimation of Moments and Production Decisions Under Uncertainty , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[93]  J. J. McCall,et al.  Competitive Production for Constant Risk Utility Functions , 1967 .

[94]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Alternative treatments of congestion in DEA: A rejoinder to Cooper, Gu, and Li , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[95]  E. Appelbaum The estimation of the degree of oligopoly power , 1982 .

[96]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  What Is the Economic Meaning of FDH? A Reply to Thrall , 2000 .

[97]  H. Varian The Nonparametric Approach to Production Analysis , 1984 .

[98]  R. Färe,et al.  The measurement of efficiency of production , 1985 .

[99]  J. Tind,et al.  Convex Input and Output Projections of Nonconvex Production Possibility Sets , 2000 .

[100]  N. Petersen,et al.  Chance constrained efficiency evaluation , 1995 .

[101]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Introduction to the theory and application of data envelopment analysis , 2001 .