Information Technology and the Nature of Managerial Work: From the Productivity Paradox to the Icarus Paradox?

Modern organizations are investing heavily in information technology (IT) with the objective of increasing overall profitability and the productivity of their knowledge workers. Yet, it is often claimed that the actual benefits of IT are disappointing at best, and that IT spending has failed to yield significant productivity gains -- hence the productivity paradox. Evidence is fragmented and somewhat mitigated. This paper argues that the current state of empirical research results from a failure to understand the interplay between IT and managerial work. It addresses this issue by analyzing patterns of association between IT usage and the nature of managerial work in different organizational contexts. Fifty-nine semi- structured interviews were conducted with middle line managers in three large companies: a Bank, a Telecommunications company, and a Utility. In addition, daily activities and IT usage were logged. The data indicate that the relationship between the level of IT usage and the nature of managerial work was stronger in the two organizations that were reorienting their strategies (Bank, Telecommunications) than in the one pursuing its existing strategy (Utility). It was also found that the pattern of the relationship between IT usage and the nature of managerial work depended on the kind of strategic reorientation implemented by the firm. For instance, in the Bank, the level of IT usage was associated with the amount of time spent by managers on information-related activities (e.g., reading reports, gathering information) and on disturbance handling activities (e.g., resolving conflicts, managing crises). In the Telecommunications company, IT usage was associated with more time spent on information-related activities and less on negotiation-related activities (e.g., discussions with colleagues on resource sharing, discussions with subordinates on performance standards). This finding suggests that heavy IT users paid greater attention to and spent more time on the roles they performed best with the technology (information-related activities), and may in fact have been embarking on an over-specialization trajectory.

[1]  Paul A. Strassmann,et al.  The Business Value of Computers: An Executive's Guide , 1990 .

[2]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[3]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on Middle Managers , 1993, MIS Q..

[4]  T. R. Davis Information technology and white-collar productivity , 1991 .

[5]  Peter Weill,et al.  The Relationship Between Investment in Information Technology and Firm Performance: A Study of the Valve Manufacturing Sector , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Jon Hartwick,et al.  The Impact of Automated Office Systems on Middle Managers and Their Work , 1987, MIS Q..

[7]  O. D. Duncan,et al.  Introduction to Structural Equation Models. , 1977 .

[8]  A. Pinsonneault,et al.  Middle management downsizing: an empirical investigation of the impact of information technology , 1997 .

[9]  Danny Miller,et al.  Momentum and Revolution in Organizational Adaptation , 1980 .

[10]  T. L. Whisler The impact of computers on organizations , 1970 .

[11]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[12]  Joey Franklin George Computers and the centralization of decision-making in u.s. city governments (united states) , 1986 .

[13]  A. Tsui A role set analysis of managerial reputation , 1984 .

[14]  Rosemary Stewart,et al.  Information technology, organizational restructuring and the future of middle management , 1993 .

[15]  D. H. Mellor,et al.  Real time , 1981 .

[16]  S. Floyd,et al.  The strategy process, middle management involvement, and organizational performance , 1990 .

[17]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Information Technology and Organizational Structure , 1977 .

[18]  Rob Kling,et al.  Desktop Computerization as a Continuing Process , 1990, ICIS.

[19]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  Information technology: Increasing productivity in services , 1994 .

[20]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[21]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation , 1985 .

[22]  Barlow Rb,et al.  The impact of computers. , 1993 .

[23]  Maryellen R. Kelley,et al.  Productivity and Information Technology: The Elusive Connection , 1994 .

[24]  David A. Specht,et al.  On the evaluation of causal models , 1975 .

[25]  K. Cameron,et al.  Organizational Downsizing: A Convergence and Reorientation Framework , 1993 .

[26]  Danny Miller,et al.  The Icarus Paradox: How Exceptional Companies Bring About Their Own Downfall , 1990 .

[27]  James McCalman,et al.  Confidence, visibility and pressure: the effects of shared information in computer aided hotel management , 1988 .

[28]  Henry Mintzberg The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974, Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977).

[29]  P. Strassmann The business value of computers , 1990 .

[30]  C. Gotlieb,et al.  Productivity and computers in Canadian banking , 1993 .

[31]  D. R. Heise Problems in Path Analysis and Causal Inference , 1969 .

[32]  Danny Miller,et al.  The simplicity of competitive repertoires : An empirical analysis , 1996 .

[33]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Note—Mintzberg was Right!: A Replication and Extension of The Nature of Managerial Work , 1983 .

[34]  S. Klatzky,et al.  Automation, Size, and the Locus of Decision Making: The Cascade Effect , 1970 .

[35]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Transforming Work Through Information Technology: A Comparative Case Study of Geographic Information Systems in County Government , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  S. Barley Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[37]  Ida R. Hoos,et al.  When the Computer Takes Over the Office , 1983 .

[38]  F. Mann,et al.  Observations on the Dynamics of a Change to Electronic Data-Processing Equipment , 1960 .

[39]  P. Osterman The Impact of Computers on the Employment of Clerks and Managers , 1986 .

[40]  J. Kotter,et al.  What effective general managers really do. , 1982, Harvard business review.

[41]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Is Information Systems Spending Productive? New Evidence and New Results , 1993, ICIS.

[42]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[43]  James W. Fairfield-Sonn,et al.  The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in ICI. , 1987 .

[44]  Raymond R. Panko,et al.  Is Office Productivity Stagnant? , 1991, MIS Q..

[45]  S. Roach Services under siege--the restructuring imperative. , 1991, Harvard business review.