Using the Predicted Responses from List Experiments as Explanatory Variables in Regression Models

The list experiment, also known as the item count technique, is becoming increasingly popular as a survey methodology for eliciting truthful responses to sensitive questions. Recently, multivariate regression techniques have been developed to predict the unobserved response to sensitive questions using respondent characteristics. Nevertheless, no method exists for using this predicted response as an explanatory variable in another regression model. We address this gap by first improving the performance of a naive two-step estimator. Despite its simplicity, this improved two-step estimator can only be applied to linear models and is statistically inefficient. We therefore develop a maximum likelihood estimator that is fully efficient and applicable to a wide range of models. We use a simulation study to evaluate the empirical performance of the proposed methods. We also apply them to the Mexico 2012 Panel Study and examine whether vote-buying is associated with increased turnout and candidate approval. The proposed methods are implemented in open-source software.

[1]  S L Warner,et al.  Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. , 1965, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[2]  Gary W. Cox,et al.  Turnout and Rural Corruption: New York as a Test Case , 1981 .

[3]  Mathew D. McCubbins,et al.  Electoral Politics as a Redistributive Game , 1986, The Journal of Politics.

[4]  J. Weibull,et al.  Balanced-budget redistribution as the outcome of political competition , 1987 .

[5]  W. Cornelius,et al.  The Mexican political system in transition , 1991 .

[6]  James A. McCann,et al.  Shaping Mexico's Electoral Arena: The Construction of Partisan Cleavages in the 1988 and 1991 National Elections , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[7]  A. Dixit,et al.  The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics , 1996, The Journal of Politics.

[8]  James H. Kuklinski,et al.  Racial Attitudes and the "New South" , 1997, The Journal of Politics.

[9]  Dan R. Dalton,et al.  Base rate for employee theft: Convergence of multiple methods. , 1997 .

[10]  Barry C. Burden Voter Turnout and the National Election Studies , 2000, Political Analysis.

[11]  André Blais,et al.  To Vote or Not to Vote , 2000 .

[12]  W. Cornelius 3. Mobilized Voting in the 2000 Elections: The Changing Efficacy of Vote Buying and Coercion in Mexican Electoral Politics , 2003, Mexico’s Pivotal Democratic Election.

[13]  S. Craig,et al.  Religion and Presidential Politics in Florida: A List Experiment* , 2004 .

[14]  Ernesto Calvo,et al.  Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market , 2004 .

[15]  Valeria Brusco,et al.  Vote Buying in Argentina , 2004 .

[16]  P. Biemer,et al.  Model-based estimation of drug use prevalence using item count data , 2005 .

[17]  S. Stokes Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina , 2005, American Political Science Review.

[18]  Clientelism and Social Funds: Evidence from Chávez's Misiones , 2007 .

[19]  Kenneth F. Greene Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective , 2007 .

[20]  R. Tourangeau,et al.  Sensitive questions in surveys. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  Steven I. Wilkinson,et al.  Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition , 2007 .

[22]  Michael A. Genovese,et al.  Social Desirability Effects and Support for a Female American President , 2008 .

[23]  Simeon Nichter,et al.  Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot , 2008, American Political Science Review.

[24]  Alejandro Moreno,et al.  Consolidating Mexico's democracy : the 2006 presidential campaign in comparative perspective , 2009 .

[25]  E. Gyimah-Boadi,et al.  VOTE-BUYING AND POLITICAL BEHAVIOR: ESTIMATING AND EXPLAINING VOTE-BUYING'S EFFECT ON TURNOUT IN KENYA , 2009 .

[26]  Daniel Corstange,et al.  Sensitive Questions, Truthful Answers? Modeling the List Experiment with LISTIT , 2009, Political Analysis.

[27]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports Tests using the item count technique , 2010 .

[28]  Simeon Nichter,et al.  Varieties of Clientelism: Machine Politics During Elections , 2010 .

[29]  Kosuke Imai,et al.  Multivariate Regression Analysis for the Item Count Technique , 2011 .

[30]  Wendy Visscher,et al.  The Item Count Technique as a Method of Indirect Questioning: A Review of Its Development and a Case Study Application , 2011 .

[31]  Jacob N. Shapiro,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Endorsement Experiments: Measuring Support for Militant Groups in Pakistan , 2011, Political Analysis.

[32]  Daniel Corstange VOTE TRAFFICKING IN LEBANON , 2012, International Journal of Middle East Studies.

[33]  Daniel Corstange Religion, Pluralism, and Iconography in the Public Sphere: Theory and Evidence From Lebanon , 2012 .

[34]  Kosuke Imai,et al.  Statistical Analysis of List Experiments , 2012, Political Analysis.

[35]  Ezequiel Gonzalez-Ocantos,et al.  Vote Buying and Social Desirability Bias: Experimental Evidence from Nicaragua , 2012 .

[36]  Simeon Nichter Clientelism , Declared Support and Mexico ’ s 2012 Campaign , 2013 .

[37]  Valeria Brusco,et al.  Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics , 2013 .

[38]  Adam Glynn What Can We Learn with Statistical Truth Serum?Design and Analysis of the List Experiment , 2013 .

[39]  Simeon Nichter,et al.  Varieties of Clientelism: Machine Politics during Elections: VARIETIES OF CLIENTELISM , 2014 .

[40]  K. Imai,et al.  Comparing and Combining List and Endorsement Experiments: Evidence from Afghanistan , 2014 .

[41]  S AhlquistJohn,et al.  Alien Abduction and Voter Impersonation in the 2012 U.S. General Election: Evidence from a Survey List Experiment , 2014 .

[42]  Mexico's Evolving Democracy: A Comparative Study of the 2012 Elections , 2014 .

[43]  Frances Hagopian Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. By Susan C. Stokes, Thad Dunning, Marcelo Nazareno, and Valeria Brusco. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. 344p. $ 85.00 cloth. $ 29.99 paper. , 2015, Perspectives on Politics.

[44]  Kosuke Imai,et al.  Design and Analysis of the Randomized Response Technique , 2015 .

[45]  Kosuke Imai,et al.  An Empirical Validation Study of Popular Survey Methodologies for Sensitive Questions , 2016 .

[46]  C. Hartshorne Who Votes? , 2017 .