Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle

The repair of DNA lesions that occur endogenously or in response to diverse genotoxic stresses is indispensable for genome integrity. DNA lesions activate checkpoint pathways that regulate specific DNA-repair mechanisms in the different phases of the cell cycle. Checkpoint-arrested cells resume cell-cycle progression once damage has been repaired, whereas cells with unrepairable DNA lesions undergo permanent cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis. Recent studies have provided insights into the mechanisms that contribute to DNA repair in specific cell-cycle phases and have highlighted the mechanisms that ensure cell-cycle progression or arrest in normal and cancerous cells.

[1]  Heinz Ruffner,et al.  BRCA1 Is Phosphorylated at Serine 1497 In Vivo at a Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 Phosphorylation Site , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[2]  J. Bartek,et al.  RPA mediates recombination repair during replication stress and is displaced from DNA by checkpoint signalling in human cells. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Michael B. Yaffe,et al.  RNF8 Transduces the DNA-Damage Signal via Histone Ubiquitylation and Checkpoint Protein Assembly , 2007, Cell.

[4]  Marco Foiani,et al.  DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1 , 2004, Nature.

[5]  Michele Pagano,et al.  Degradation of Cdc25A by β-TrCP during S phase and in response to DNA damage , 2003, Nature.

[6]  Efterpi Papouli,et al.  Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[7]  A. D’Andrea,et al.  ATR couples FANCD2 monoubiquitination to the DNA-damage response. , 2004, Genes & development.

[8]  H. Piwnica-Worms,et al.  Chk1 Kinase Negatively Regulates Mitotic Function of Cdc25A Phosphatase through 14-3-3 Binding , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[9]  R. Baer,et al.  Nuclear Localization and Cell Cycle-specific Expression of CtIP, a Protein That Associates with the BRCA1 Tumor Suppressor* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  G. Lucchini,et al.  Cell cycle progression in the presence of irreparable DNA damage is controlled by a Mec1‐ and Rad53‐dependent checkpoint in budding yeast , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[11]  Y. Li,et al.  DNA helicase Srs 2 disrupts the Rad 51 presynaptic filament , 2003 .

[12]  Xin Wang,et al.  A critical role for the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc13 in initiating homologous recombination. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[13]  L. Symington,et al.  Recombination proteins in yeast. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.

[14]  Kim Nasmyth,et al.  Cohesion between sister chromatids must be established during DNA replication , 1998, Current Biology.

[15]  J. Haber,et al.  Role of yeast SIR genes and mating type in directing DNA double-strand breaks to homologous and non-homologous repair paths , 1999, Current Biology.

[16]  A. Grollman,et al.  Insertion of specific bases during DNA synthesis past the oxidation-damaged base 8-oxodG , 1991, Nature.

[17]  H. Ulrich Mutual interactions between the SUMO and ubiquitin systems: a plea of no contest. , 2005, Trends in cell biology.

[18]  T. Kouzarides Chromatin Modifications and Their Function , 2007, Cell.

[19]  A. Kumagai,et al.  Claspin, a novel protein required for the activation of Chk1 during a DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus egg extracts. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[20]  K. Shirahige,et al.  Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[21]  A. Carr,et al.  Cdc2-cyclin B kinase activity links Crb2 and Rqh1-topoisomerase III. , 2002, Genes & development.

[22]  M. Kastan,et al.  Involvement of the cohesin protein, Smc1, in Atm-dependent and independent responses to DNA damage. , 2002, Genes & development.

[23]  V. Schreiber,et al.  Parp‐1 protects homologous recombination from interference by Ku and Ligase IV in vertebrate cells , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[24]  M. Kupiec,et al.  The CDK regulates repair of double‐strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[25]  G. Braus,et al.  Smt3/SUMO and Ubc9 are required for efficient APC/C‐mediated proteolysis in budding yeast , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[26]  I. Hickson,et al.  Top3 processes recombination intermediates and modulates checkpoint activity after DNA damage. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[27]  M. Porteus,et al.  Human SMC5/6 complex promotes sister chromatid homologous recombination by recruiting the SMC1/3 cohesin complex to double‐strand breaks , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[28]  Boris Pfander,et al.  RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO , 2002, Nature.

[29]  Hiroyuki Osada,et al.  Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) phosphorylation destabilizes somatic Wee1 via multiple pathways. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  B. A. Ballif,et al.  ATM and ATR Substrate Analysis Reveals Extensive Protein Networks Responsive to DNA Damage , 2007, Science.

[31]  Hiroyuki Osada,et al.  M-phase kinases induce phospho-dependent ubiquitination of somatic Wee1 by SCFbeta-TrCP. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Philipp Stelter,et al.  Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation , 2003, Nature.

[33]  F. Melchior,et al.  Concepts in sumoylation: a decade on , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[34]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Translesion synthesis: Y-family polymerases and the polymerase switch. , 2007, DNA repair.

[35]  A. Yasui,et al.  RAD18 and Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Independently Suppress the Access of Nonhomologous End Joining to Double-Strand Breaks and Facilitate Homologous Recombination-Mediated Repair , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[36]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[37]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  Abraxas and RAP80 Form a BRCA1 Protein Complex Required for the DNA Damage Response , 2007, Science.

[38]  S. Jackson,et al.  gammaH2AX and MDC1: anchoring the DNA-damage-response machinery to broken chromosomes. , 2006, DNA repair.

[39]  C. Newlon,et al.  The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks , 2001, Nature.

[40]  N. Pavletich,et al.  The BRCA2 homologue Brh2 nucleates RAD51 filament formation at a dsDNA–ssDNA junction , 2005, Nature.

[41]  P. Plevani,et al.  The 9-1-1 Checkpoint Clamp Physically Interacts with Polζ and Is Partially Required for Spontaneous Polζ-dependent Mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[42]  S. Jentsch,et al.  PCNA controls establishment of sister chromatid cohesion during S phase. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[43]  Shunichi Takeda,et al.  Differential usage of non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination in double strand break repair. , 2006, DNA repair.

[44]  T. Ohta,et al.  The RING Heterodimer BRCA1-BARD1 Is a Ubiquitin Ligase Inactivated by a Breast Cancer-derived Mutation* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[45]  Bo Xu,et al.  Convergence of the Fanconi Anemia and Ataxia Telangiectasia Signaling Pathways , 2002, Cell.

[46]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  Human MMS21/NSE2 Is a SUMO Ligase Required for DNA Repair , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[47]  K. Nasmyth,et al.  Sister chromatid cohesion is required for postreplicative double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2001, Current Biology.

[48]  A. Sancar,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. , 2004, Annual review of biochemistry.

[49]  Junjie Chen,et al.  BRCA1 ubiquitinates its phosphorylation-dependent binding partner CtIP. , 2006, Genes & development.

[50]  J. Bartek,et al.  DNA damage checkpoints: from initiation to recovery or adaptation. , 2007, Current opinion in cell biology.

[51]  Weidong Wang,et al.  FANCL Replaces BRCA1 as the Likely Ubiquitin Ligase Responsible for FANCD2 Monoubiquitination , 2004, Cell cycle.

[52]  P. Hieter,et al.  Ctf7p is essential for sister chromatid cohesion and links mitotic chromosome structure to the DNA replication machinery. , 1999, Genes & development.

[53]  S. Boulton,et al.  BRCA1 ubiquitylation of CtIP: Just the tIP of the iceberg? , 2006, DNA repair.

[54]  L. Symington,et al.  The Mre11 Nuclease Is Not Required for 5′ to 3′ Resection at Multiple HO-Induced Double-Strand Breaks , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[55]  R. Paules,et al.  The human decatenation checkpoint , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  Erica S. Johnson,et al.  The SUMO Isopeptidase Ulp2 Prevents Accumulation of SUMO Chains in Yeast* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[57]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  Destruction of Claspin by SCFbetaTrCP restrains Chk1 activation and facilitates recovery from genotoxic stress. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[58]  Thierry Soussi,et al.  Significance of TP53 mutations in human cancer: A critical analysis of mutations at CpG dinucleotides , 2003, Human mutation.

[59]  E. Y. Lee,et al.  Ionizing radiation-induced Rad51 nuclear focus formation is cell cycle-regulated and defective in both ATM(-/-) and c-Abl(-/-) cells. , 2003, Mutation research.

[60]  Aedín C Culhane,et al.  RAP80 Targets BRCA1 to Specific Ubiquitin Structures at DNA Damage Sites , 2007, Science.

[61]  R. Paules,et al.  ATR Enforces the Topoisomerase II-dependent G2 Checkpoint through Inhibition of Plk1 Kinase* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[62]  Anindya Dutta,et al.  UBE2T is the E2 in the Fanconi anemia pathway and undergoes negative autoregulation. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[63]  S. E. Lee,et al.  Evidence for DNA-PK-dependent and -independent DNA double-strand break repair pathways in mammalian cells as a function of the cell cycle , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[64]  Patrick Heun,et al.  SUMOrganization of the nucleus. , 2007, Current opinion in cell biology.

[65]  T. Hirano At the heart of the chromosome: SMC proteins in action , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[66]  M. Kelley,et al.  DNA repair in neurons: so if they don't divide what's to repair? , 2007, Mutation research.

[67]  Z. Ronai,et al.  Ubiquitin and SUMO systems in the regulation of mitotic checkpoints. , 2006, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[68]  M. Foiani,et al.  The DNA damage response during DNA replication. , 2005, Current opinion in cell biology.

[69]  Robert J. D. Reid,et al.  The Role of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Spontaneous Homologous Recombination in S. cerevisiae , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[70]  Katsuhiko Shirahige,et al.  Top1- and Top2-mediated topological transitions at replication forks ensure fork progression and stability and prevent DNA damage checkpoint activation. , 2007, Genes & development.

[71]  H. Arakawa,et al.  Multiple repair pathways mediate tolerance to chemotherapeutic cross-linking agents in vertebrate cells. , 2005, Cancer research.

[72]  Y. Shiloh ATM and related protein kinases: safeguarding genome integrity , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[73]  A. Aguilera The connection between transcription and genomic instability , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[74]  Michael G. Sehorn,et al.  RECQL5/Recql5 helicase regulates homologous recombination and suppresses tumor formation via disruption of Rad51 presynaptic filaments. , 2007, Genes & development.

[75]  J. Yates,et al.  Phosphorylation of Rad55 on Serines 2, 8, and 14 Is Required for Efficient Homologous Recombination in the Recovery of Stalled Replication Forks , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[76]  J. Haber,et al.  Smc5–Smc6 mediate DNA double-strand-break repair by promoting sister-chromatid recombination , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[77]  Martin Kupiec,et al.  New insights into the mechanism of homologous recombination in yeast. , 2004, Mutation research.

[78]  J. Haber,et al.  Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1999, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[79]  F. Z. Watts,et al.  Nse 2 , a Component of the Smc 5-6 Complex , Is a SUMO Ligase Required for the Response to DNA Damage , 2004 .

[80]  P. Russell,et al.  Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates Mus81 to preserve genome integrity during replication stress. , 2005, Genes & development.

[81]  H. Ruffner,et al.  Cancer-predisposing mutations within the RING domain of BRCA1: Loss of ubiquitin protein ligase activity and protection from radiation hypersensitivity , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[82]  Boris Pfander,et al.  SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase , 2005, Nature.

[83]  Mary B. Kroetz,et al.  The Yeast Hex3·Slx8 Heterodimer Is a Ubiquitin Ligase Stimulated by Substrate Sumoylation* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[84]  Y. Yamaguchi-Iwai,et al.  Homologous recombination and non‐homologous end‐joining pathways of DNA double‐strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[85]  J. Haber,et al.  Regulation of Saccharomyces Rad53 checkpoint kinase during adaptation from DNA damage-induced G2/M arrest. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[86]  Junjie Chen,et al.  Ubiquitin-Binding Protein RAP80 Mediates BRCA1-Dependent DNA Damage Response , 2007, Science.

[87]  M. Yanagida,et al.  Cdc2 phosphorylation of Crb2 is required for reestablishing cell cycle progression after the damage checkpoint. , 1999, Molecular cell.

[88]  P. Russell,et al.  Ctp1 is a cell-cycle-regulated protein that functions with Mre11 complex to control double-strand break repair by homologous recombination. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[89]  T. Lindahl,et al.  DNA excision repair pathways. , 1997, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[90]  A. Dejean,et al.  SUMO, the three Rs and cancer. , 2007, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[91]  David J. Chen,et al.  Independent and sequential recruitment of NHEJ and HR factors to DNA damage sites in mammalian cells , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[92]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for mammalian homologous recombination repair , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[93]  John A Tainer,et al.  SUMO‐targeted ubiquitin ligases in genome stability , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[94]  M. Porteus,et al.  Human SMC 5 / 6 complex promotes sister chromatid homologous recombination by recruiting the SMC 1 / 3 cohesin complex to double-strand breaks , 2006 .

[95]  F. Z. Watts,et al.  Nse2, a Component of the Smc5-6 Complex, Is a SUMO Ligase Required for the Response to DNA Damage , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[96]  M. Foiani,et al.  RecQ helicases queuing with Srs2 to disrupt Rad51 filaments and suppress recombination. , 2007, Genes & development.

[97]  S. Jentsch,et al.  Control of Rad52 recombination activity by double-strand break-induced SUMO modification , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[98]  Y. Shiloh,et al.  Chromatin relaxation in response to DNA double-strand breaks is modulated by a novel ATM- and KAP-1 dependent pathway , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[99]  A. Shinohara,et al.  The controlling role of ATM in homologous recombinational repair of DNA damage , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[100]  Stephen P. Jackson,et al.  Conserved modes of recruitment of ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs to sites of DNA damage , 2005, Nature.

[101]  Jun Qin,et al.  SCFbeta-TRCP links Chk1 signaling to degradation of the Cdc25A protein phosphatase. , 2003, Genes & development.

[102]  D. Barnes,et al.  Accumulation of the Oxidative Base Lesion 8-Hydroxyguanine in DNA of Tumor-Prone Mice Defective in Both the Myh and Ogg1 DNA Glycosylases , 2004, Cancer Research.

[103]  M. Lopes,et al.  Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[104]  S. West,et al.  CDK-dependent phosphorylation of BRCA2 as a regulatory mechanism for recombinational repair , 2005, Nature.

[105]  K. Sugimoto,et al.  Requirement of the Mre11 Complex and Exonuclease 1 for Activation of the Mec1 Signaling Pathway , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[106]  B. Koller,et al.  Brca1 controls homology-directed DNA repair. , 1999, Molecular cell.

[107]  M. Lopes,et al.  Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase. , 2005, Genes & development.

[108]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Interaction of human DNA polymerase eta with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[109]  P. Plevani,et al.  Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1‐dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[110]  Alain Verreault,et al.  Chromatin Challenges during DNA Replication and Repair , 2007, Cell.

[111]  Xiaolan Zhao,et al.  A SUMO ligase is part of a nuclear multiprotein complex that affects DNA repair and chromosomal organization. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[112]  J. Rine,et al.  Yeast cell-type regulation of DNA repair , 1999, Nature.

[113]  Laurence Pelletier,et al.  Orchestration of the DNA-Damage Response by the RNF8 Ubiquitin Ligase , 2007, Science.

[114]  F. Fabre,et al.  The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments , 2003, Nature.

[115]  Anna Malkova,et al.  Srs2 and Sgs1–Top3 Suppress Crossovers during Double-Strand Break Repair in Yeast , 2003, Cell.

[116]  K. Vermeulen,et al.  The cell cycle: a review of regulation, deregulation and therapeutic targets in cancer , 2003, Cell proliferation.

[117]  S. Elledge,et al.  Ubc13/Rnf8 ubiquitin ligases control foci formation of the Rap80/Abraxas/Brca1/Brcc36 complex in response to DNA damage , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[118]  S. Elledge,et al.  Identification of the FANCI Protein, a Monoubiquitinated FANCD2 Paralog Required for DNA Repair , 2007, Cell.

[119]  K. Ohta,et al.  Ubc9- and Mms21-Mediated Sumoylation Counteracts Recombinogenic Events at Damaged Replication Forks , 2006, Cell.

[120]  M. Leversha,et al.  Intra-nuclear trafficking of the BLM helicase to DNA damage-induced foci is regulated by SUMO modification. , 2005, Human molecular genetics.

[121]  T. Nouspikel DNA repair in differentiated cells: Some new answers to old questions , 2007, Neuroscience.

[122]  D. Koshland,et al.  DNA Double-Strand Breaks Trigger Genome-Wide Sister-Chromatid Cohesion Through Eco1 (Ctf7) , 2007, Science.

[123]  Mihoko Kai,et al.  Checkpoint activation regulates mutagenic translesion synthesis. , 2003, Genes & development.

[124]  Jun Qin,et al.  SMC1 is a downstream effector in the ATM/NBS1 branch of the human S-phase checkpoint. , 2002, Genes & development.

[125]  W. Bin,et al.  Ubc13/Rnf8ユビキチンリガーゼはDNS損傷に反応してRap80/Abraxas/Brca1/Brca1/Brcc36複合体のフォーカス形成を制御する , 2007 .

[126]  F. Fabre,et al.  Alternate pathways involving Sgs1/Top3, Mus81/ Mms4, and Srs2 prevent formation of toxic recombination intermediates from single-stranded gaps created by DNA replication , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[127]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  RNF8 Ubiquitylates Histones at DNA Double-Strand Breaks and Promotes Assembly of Repair Proteins , 2007, Cell.

[128]  M. Lopes,et al.  Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[129]  D. R. McNeill,et al.  Base excision repair and the central nervous system , 2007, Neuroscience.

[130]  M. Lopes,et al.  Fork Reversal and ssDNA Accumulation at Stalled Replication Forks Owing to Checkpoint Defects , 2002, Science.

[131]  M. Foiani,et al.  The Rad53 signal transduction pathway: Replication fork stabilization, DNA repair, and adaptation. , 2006, Experimental cell research.

[132]  A. Carr,et al.  Rad3-dependent phosphorylation of the checkpoint clamp regulates repair-pathway choice , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[133]  Anastassis Perrakis,et al.  Polo-like Kinase-1 Controls Proteasome-Dependent Degradation of Claspin during Checkpoint Recovery , 2006, Current Biology.

[134]  E. Egelman,et al.  Novel pro- and anti-recombination activities of the Bloom's syndrome helicase. , 2007, Genes & development.

[135]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Gaps and forks in DNA replication: Rediscovering old models. , 2006, DNA repair.

[136]  F. Fabre,et al.  Mrc1 and Srs2 are major actors in the regulation of spontaneous crossover , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[137]  R. Rothstein,et al.  Choreography of the DNA Damage Response Spatiotemporal Relationships among Checkpoint and Repair Proteins , 2004, Cell.

[138]  Michele Pagano,et al.  SCFbetaTrCP-mediated degradation of Claspin regulates recovery from the DNA replication checkpoint response. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[139]  JAMES C. Wang,et al.  Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[140]  A. El-Osta,et al.  Chromatin modifications and DNA double-strand breaks: the current state of play , 2007, Leukemia.

[141]  T. Thomson,et al.  Regulation of mitotic exit by the RNF8 ubiquitin ligase , 2008, Oncogene.

[142]  T. Eydmann,et al.  SMC5 and SMC6 genes are required for the segregation of repetitive chromosome regions , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[143]  K. Shirahige,et al.  Postreplicative Formation of Cohesion Is Required for Repair and Induced by a Single DNA Break , 2007, Science.

[144]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection , 2007, Nature.

[145]  P. Plevani,et al.  Physical and functional interactions between nucleotide excision repair and DNA damage checkpoint , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[146]  Michael Lichten,et al.  DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[147]  P. Sung,et al.  Mechanism of homologous recombination: mediators and helicases take on regulatory functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[148]  J. Jiricny The multifaceted mismatch-repair system , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[149]  Michio Kawasuji,et al.  Rad18 guides polη to replication stalling sites through physical interaction and PCNA monoubiquitination , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[150]  Ying Li,et al.  DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament , 2003, Nature.

[151]  Ian D. Hickson,et al.  The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination , 2003, Nature.

[152]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Controlling the subcellular localization of DNA polymerases ι and η via interactions with ubiquitin , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[153]  Stephen J. Elledge,et al.  Cell Cycle Checkpoints: Preventing an Identity Crisis , 1996, Science.

[154]  F. Fabre,et al.  The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments , 2003, Nature.

[155]  Robert J. D. Reid,et al.  The Smc5–Smc6 complex and SUMO modification of Rad52 regulates recombinational repair at the ribosomal gene locus , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[156]  L. Busino,et al.  Cdc25A phosphatase: combinatorial phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and proteolysis , 2004, Oncogene.

[157]  R. Rothstein,et al.  The Slx5-Slx8 Complex Affects Sumoylation of DNA Repair Proteins and Negatively Regulates Recombination , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[158]  L. Ström,et al.  Chromosome segregation and double-strand break repair - a complex connection. , 2007, Current opinion in cell biology.

[159]  J. Oshima,et al.  The G2-phase decatenation checkpoint is defective in Werner syndrome cells. , 2003, Cancer research.

[160]  L. Niedernhofer The Fanconi anemia signalosome anchor. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[161]  J. Haber,et al.  Phosphorylation of Slx4 by Mec1 and Tel1 Regulates the Single-Strand Annealing Mode of DNA Repair in Budding Yeast , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[162]  M. Foiani,et al.  Interplay of replication checkpoints and repair proteins at stalled replication forks. , 2007, DNA repair.