Analysis and Simulation of Intervention Strategies against Bus Bunching by means of an Empirical Agent-Based Model

In this paper, we propose an Empirically-based Monte Carlo Bus-network (EMB) model as a test bed to simulate intervention strategies to overcome the inefficiencies of bus bunching. The EMB model is an agent-based model which utilizes the positional and temporal data of the buses obtained from the Global Positioning System (GPS) to constitute: (1) a set of empirical velocity distributions of the buses, and (2) a set of exponential distributions of inter-arrival time of passengers at the bus stops. Monte Carlo sampling is then performed on these two derived probability distributions to yield the stochastic dynamics of both the buses' motion and passengers' arrival. Our EMB model is generic and can be applied to any real-world bus network system. In particular, we have validated the model against the Nanyang Technological University's Shuttle Bus System by demonstrating its accuracy in capturing the bunching dynamics of the shuttle buses. Furthermore, we have analyzed the efficacy of three intervention strategies: holding, no-boarding, and centralized-pulsing, against bus bunching by incorporating the rule-set of these strategies into the model. Under the scenario where the buses have the same velocity, we found that all three strategies improve both the waiting and travelling time of the commuters. However, when the buses have different velocities, only the centralized-pulsing scheme consistently outperform the control scenario where the buses periodically bunch together.

[1]  Lock Yue Chew,et al.  Intelligent Buses in a Loop Service: Emergence of No-Boarding and Holding Strategies , 2019, Complex..

[2]  C. Gershenson,et al.  Why Does Public Transport Not Arrive on Time? The Pervasiveness of Equal Headway Instability , 2009, PloS one.

[3]  G. F. Newell,et al.  Control Strategies for an Idealized Public Transportation System , 1972 .

[4]  Xiugang Li,et al.  A methodology to derive the critical demand density for designing and operating feeder transit services , 2009 .

[5]  Matthias Andres,et al.  A predictive-control framework to address bus bunching , 2017 .

[6]  L. English Synchronization of oscillators: an ideal introduction to phase transitions , 2007 .

[7]  V. I. Bykov,et al.  Dynamics of first-order phase transitions , 2009 .

[8]  Tom Froese,et al.  Can Government Be Self-Organized? A Mathematical Model of the Collective Social Organization of Ancient Teotihuacan, Central Mexico , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  Fraser McLeod Headway-based Selective Priority to Buses , 1998 .

[10]  Michael Schreckenberg,et al.  Empirical synchronized flow in oversaturated city traffic. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Wei Liang Quek,et al.  Bus bunching as a synchronisation phenomenon , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Bin Yu,et al.  A dynamic holding strategy in public transit systems with real-time information , 2009, Applied Intelligence.

[13]  G. F. Newell Control of Pairing of Vehicles on a Public Transportation Route, Two Vehicles, One Control Point , 1974 .

[14]  Georgiy V. Bobashev,et al.  Pain Town, an Agent-Based Model of Opioid Use Trajectories in a Small Community , 2018, SBP-BRiMS.

[15]  Michael Schreckenberg,et al.  A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic , 1992 .

[16]  R. Barlovic,et al.  Localized defects in a cellular automaton model for traffic flow with phase separation , 2001 .

[17]  Ronghui Liu,et al.  Modelling Urban Bus Service and Passenger Reliability. , 2007 .

[18]  Ronghui Liu,et al.  Modelling bus bunching and holding control with vehicle overtaking and distributed passenger boarding behaviour , 2017 .

[19]  M. Slemrod,et al.  DYNAMICS OF FIRST ORDER PHASE TRANSITIONS , 1984 .

[20]  Saeed Zolfaghari,et al.  A Model For Holding Strategy In Public Transit Systems With Real-Time Information , 2004 .

[21]  Maged Dessouky,et al.  A simulation study of demand responsive transit system design , 2008 .

[22]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Beate Schmittmann,et al.  Statistical mechanics of driven diffusive systems , 1995 .

[24]  Mark D. Hickman,et al.  The Real–Time Stop–Skipping Problem , 2005, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[25]  Lock Yue Chew,et al.  No-boarding buses: Synchronisation for efficiency , 2019, PloS one.

[26]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences , 2001, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series.

[27]  Zhiyuan Liu,et al.  Bus stop-skipping scheme with random travel time , 2013 .

[28]  Luca Quadrifoglio,et al.  A model for estimating the optimal cycle length of demand responsive feeder transit services , 2013 .

[29]  R B Potts,et al.  Maintaining a bus schedule , 1964 .

[30]  Nigel H. M. Wilson,et al.  Modeling real-time control strategies in public transit operations , 1999 .

[31]  Aldo Cipriano,et al.  Bus-Stop Control Strategies Based on Fuzzy Rules for the Operation of a Public Transport System , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[32]  Ludovic Leclercq,et al.  Comparing bus holding methods with and without real-time predictions , 2017 .

[33]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Reducing bunching with bus-to-bus cooperation , 2011 .

[34]  Xia Luo,et al.  Improving Bus Operations through Integrated Dynamic Holding Control and Schedule Optimization , 2018, Journal of Advanced Transportation.

[35]  Lock Yue Chew,et al.  Stability of anti-bunched buses and local unidirectional Kuramoto oscillators , 2019 .

[36]  Vladimir Privman,et al.  Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics in One Dimension: Experimental Results , 1997 .

[37]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  A headway-based approach to eliminate bus bunching: Systematic analysis and comparisons , 2009 .

[38]  Yanfeng Ouyang,et al.  Dynamic bus substitution strategy for bunching intervention , 2018, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[39]  Mark D. Abkowitz,et al.  OPTIMAL CONTROL OF HEADWAY VARIATION ON TRANSIT ROUTES , 1986 .

[40]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization: Phase locking and frequency entrainment , 2001 .

[41]  Andreas Schadschneider,et al.  Traffic flow: a statistical physics point of view , 2002 .

[42]  Ahmed El-Geneidy,et al.  Have they bunched yet? An exploratory study of the impacts of bus bunching on dwell and running times , 2016, Public Transp..

[43]  Minghui Ma,et al.  Multiobjective Optimal Formulations for Bus Fleet Size of Public Transit under Headway-Based Holding Control , 2019, Journal of Advanced Transportation.