Tactile Flow Overrides Other Cues To Self Motion

Vestibular-somatosensory interactions are pervasive in the brain but it remains unclear why. Here we explore the contribution of tactile flow to processing self-motion. We assessed two aspects of self-motion: timing and speed. Participants sat on an oscillating swing and either kept their hands on their laps or rested them lightly on an earth-stationary surface. They viewed a grating oscillating at the same frequency as their motion and judged its phase or, in a separate experiment, its speed relative to their perceived motion. Participants required the phase to precede body movement (with or without tactile flow) or tactile flow by ~5° (44 ms) to appear earth-stationary. Speed judgments were 4–10% faster when motion was from tactile flow, either alone or with body motion, compared to body motion alone (where speed judgments were accurate). By comparing response variances we conclude that phase and speed judgments do not reflect optimal integration of tactile flow with other cues to body motion: instead tactile flow dominates perceived self-motion – acting as an emergency override. This may explain why even minimal tactile cues are so helpful in promoting stability and suggests that providing artificial tactile cues might be a powerful aid to perceiving self-motion.

[1]  Hendrik A. H. C. van Veen,et al.  A Tactile Cockpit Instrument Supports the Control of Self-Motion During Spatial Disorientation , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[3]  Jennifer L. Campos,et al.  Bayesian integration of visual and vestibular signals for heading. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[4]  D. Bilo,et al.  Neck flexion related activity of flight control muscles in the flow-stimulated pigeon , 1983, Journal of comparative physiology.

[5]  François Klam,et al.  ã Federation of European Neuroscience Societies Visual±vestibular interactive responses in the macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP) , 2022 .

[6]  W P Medendorp,et al.  Fusion of visual and vestibular tilt cues in the perception of visual vertical. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  P. Haggard,et al.  How the vestibular system interacts with somatosensory perception: A sham-controlled study with galvanic vestibular stimulation , 2013, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  Yasushi Ikei,et al.  Tactile flow on seat pan modulates perceived forward velocity , 2013, 2013 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[9]  Yasushi Ikei,et al.  Perceived forward velocity increases with tactile flow on seat pan , 2013, 2013 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[10]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Neural correlates of multisensory cue integration in macaque MSTd , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  A. Väljamäe Auditorily-induced illusory self-motion: A review , 2009, Brain Research Reviews.

[12]  Gabriella Bottini,et al.  Vestibular modulation of somatosensory perception , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[13]  Shoji Sunaga,et al.  Consistent Air Flow to the Face Facilitates Vection , 2011, Perception.

[14]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Identification of the central vestibular projections in man: a positron emission tomography activation study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  P. Haggard,et al.  Vestibular modulation of spatial perception , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[16]  Mark W. Rogers,et al.  Passive tactile sensory input improves stability during standing , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  C. Wall,et al.  The effect of vibrotactile feedback on postural sway during locomotor activities , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[18]  J. Lackner,et al.  Coupling of fingertip somatosensory information to head and body sway , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  H C Diener,et al.  On the role of vestibular, visual and somatosensory information for dynamic postural control in humans. , 1988, Progress in brain research.

[20]  D. Burr,et al.  The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration , 2004, Current Biology.

[21]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Optic Flow Processing in Monkey STS: A Theoretical and Experimental Approach , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  J. Lackner,et al.  Fingertip contact influences human postural control , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Shuichi Sakamoto,et al.  The effects of linearly moving sound images on self-motion perception , 2004 .

[25]  D. Burr,et al.  Large receptive fields for optic flow detection in humans , 1998, Vision Research.

[26]  J. Lackner,et al.  Stabilization of posture by precision contact of the index finger. , 1994, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[27]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  A Bayesian model of the disambiguation of gravitoinertial force by visual cues , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  James R. Lackner,et al.  The role of haptic cues from rough and slippery surfaces in human postural control , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Representation of Vestibular and Visual Cues to Self-Motion in Ventral Intraparietal Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  C Maurer,et al.  Vestibular, visual, and somatosensory contributions to human control of upright stance , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[31]  G. Bottini,et al.  How the vestibular system modulates tactile perception in normal subjects: a behavioural and physiological study , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  P. Haggard,et al.  Vestibular-Somatosensory Interactions: A Mechanism in Search of a Function? , 2015, Multisensory research.

[33]  Christopher R Fetsch,et al.  Dynamic Reweighting of Visual and Vestibular Cues during Self-Motion Perception , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.