Applicator reconstruction in MRI 3D image-based dose planning of brachytherapy for cervical cancer

0167-8140/$ see front matter 2008 Elsevier Irelan doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.002 * Corresponding author. Address: Department of Bio University Hospital, Brendstrupgaardsvej, DK-8200 A E-mail address: sha@mta.aaa.dk (S. Haack). Background and purpose: To elaborate a method for applicator reconstruction for MRI-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Materials and methods: Custom-made plastic catheters with a copper sulphate solution were made for insertion in the source channels of MR-CT compatible applicators: plastic and titanium tandem ring applicators, and titanium needles. The applicators were CT and MR scanned in a phantom for accurate 3D assessment of applicator visibility and geometry. A reconstruction method was developed and evaluated in 19 patient MR examinations with ring applicator (plastic: 14, titanium: 5). MR applicator reconstruction uncertainties related to inter-observer variation were evaluated. Results: The catheters were visible in the plastic applicator on T1-weighted images in phantom and in 14/ 14 clinical applications. On T2-weighted images, the catheters appeared weaker but still visible in phantom and in 13/14 MR clinical applications. In the titanium applicator, the catheters could not be separated from the artifacts from the applicator itself. However, these artifacts could be used to localize both titanium ring applicator (5/5 clinical applications) and needles (6/6 clinical applications). Standard deviations of inter-observer differences were below 2 mm in all directions. Conclusion: 3D applicator reconstruction based on MR imaging could be performed for plastic and titanium applicators. Plastic applicators proved well to be suited for MRI-based reconstruction. For improved practicability of titanium applicator reconstruction, development of MR applicator markers is essential. Reconstruction of titanium applicator and needles at 1.5 T MR requires geometric evaluations in phantoms before using the applicator in patients. 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 91 (2009) 187–193

[1]  A Guermazi,et al.  Metallic artefacts in MR imaging: effects of main field orientation and strength. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[2]  J. Dimopoulos,et al.  Systematic evaluation of MRI findings in different stages of treatment of cervical cancer: potential of MRI on delineation of target, pathoanatomic structures, and organs at risk. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Dose and volume parameters for MRI-based treatment planning in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  L. Axel,et al.  Agarose as a tissue equivalent phantom material for NMR imaging. , 1986, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Clinical impact of MRI assisted dose volume adaptation and dose escalation in brachytherapy of locally advanced cervix cancer. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  The Vienna applicator for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer: design, application, treatment planning, and dosimetric results. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-based contouring in cervical cancer brachytherapy: results of a prospective trial and preliminary guidelines for standardized contours. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Kari Tanderup,et al.  Reconstruction of a ring applicator using CT imaging: impact of the reconstruction method and applicator orientation , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  J. Schenck The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[11]  Yong-Min Huh,et al.  Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[12]  Kari Tanderup,et al.  MRI-guided 3D optimization significantly improves DVH parameters of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  J. Dimopoulos,et al.  The Vienna applicator for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer: clinical feasibility and preliminary results. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  K Wachowicz,et al.  Characterization of the susceptibility artifact around a prostate brachytherapy seed in MRI. , 2006, Medical physics.