Applicator reconstruction in MRI 3D image-based dose planning of brachytherapy for cervical cancer
暂无分享,去创建一个
Kari Tanderup | Jacob Christian Lindegaard | Søren Haack | J. Gelineck | K. Tanderup | J. Lindegaard | John Gelineck | S. K. Nielsen | S. Haack
[1] A Guermazi,et al. Metallic artefacts in MR imaging: effects of main field orientation and strength. , 2003, Clinical radiology.
[2] J. Dimopoulos,et al. Systematic evaluation of MRI findings in different stages of treatment of cervical cancer: potential of MRI on delineation of target, pathoanatomic structures, and organs at risk. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[3] Christian Kirisits,et al. Dose and volume parameters for MRI-based treatment planning in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[4] L. Axel,et al. Agarose as a tissue equivalent phantom material for NMR imaging. , 1986, Magnetic resonance imaging.
[5] Christian Kirisits,et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[6] Christian Kirisits,et al. Clinical impact of MRI assisted dose volume adaptation and dose escalation in brachytherapy of locally advanced cervix cancer. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[7] Christian Kirisits,et al. The Vienna applicator for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer: design, application, treatment planning, and dosimetric results. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[8] Christian Kirisits,et al. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-based contouring in cervical cancer brachytherapy: results of a prospective trial and preliminary guidelines for standardized contours. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[9] Kari Tanderup,et al. Reconstruction of a ring applicator using CT imaging: impact of the reconstruction method and applicator orientation , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.
[10] J. Schenck. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.
[11] Yong-Min Huh,et al. Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[12] Kari Tanderup,et al. MRI-guided 3D optimization significantly improves DVH parameters of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[13] J. Dimopoulos,et al. The Vienna applicator for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer: clinical feasibility and preliminary results. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[14] K Wachowicz,et al. Characterization of the susceptibility artifact around a prostate brachytherapy seed in MRI. , 2006, Medical physics.