Force-field adaptation without proprioception: Can vision be used to model limb dynamics?

Because our environment and our body can change from time to time, the efficiency of human motor behavior relies on the updating of the neural processes transforming intentions into actions. Adaptation to the context critically depends on sensory feedback such as vision, touch or hearing. Although proprioception is not commonly listed as one of the main senses, its role is determinant for the coordination of daily gestures like goal-directed arm movements. In particular, previous work suggests that proprioceptive information is critical to update the internal representation of limb dynamic properties. Here, we examined the motor behavior of a deafferented patient, deprived of proprioception below the nose, to assess adaptation to new dynamic conditions in the absence of limb proprioception. The patient, and age-matched control participants, reached toward visual targets in a new force field created by a rotating platform. Full vision of the limb and workspace was available throughout the experiment. Although her impairment was obvious in baseline reaching performance, the proprioceptively deafferented patient clearly adapted to the new force conditions. In fact, her time course of adaptation was similar to that observed in controls. Moreover, when tested in the normal force field after adaptation to the new force field, the patient exhibited after-effects similar to those of controls. These findings show that motor adaptation to a modified force field is possible without proprioception and that vision can compensate for the permanent loss of proprioception to update the central representation of limb dynamics.

[1]  J. Lackner,et al.  Congenitally blind individuals rapidly adapt to coriolis force perturbations of their reaching movements. , 2000, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[2]  Jinsung Wang,et al.  Adaptation to Visuomotor Rotations Remaps Movement Vectors, Not Final Positions , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  R. Miall,et al.  The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  C. Bard,et al.  Reference systems for coding spatial information in normal subjects and a deafferented patient , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  M. Latash,et al.  Effects of altering initial position on movement direction and extent. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  N. Teasdale,et al.  Vestibular signal processing in a subject with somatosensory deafferentation: The case of sitting posture , 2007, BMC neurology.

[7]  J. Lackner,et al.  Motor control and learning in altered dynamic environments , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  Christopher A. Buneo,et al.  On the form of the internal model for reaching , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  David J Ostry,et al.  Modifiability of generalization in dynamics learning. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  J. Vercher,et al.  Internally driven control of reaching movements: A study on a proprioceptively deafferented subject , 2006, Brain Research Bulletin.

[11]  C. Sherrington,et al.  VIII. Experiments upon the influence of sensory nerves upon movement and nutrition of the limbs. Preliminary communication , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[12]  Lamarre,et al.  Self-moved target eye tracking in control and deafferented subjects: roles of arm motor command and proprioception in arm-eye coordination. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Y. Lamarre,et al.  Unmyelinated tactile afferents signal touch and project to insular cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Sainburg,et al.  The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Hao Sun,et al.  The temporal properties of the response of macaque ganglion cells and central mechanisms of flicker detection. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[16]  Howard Poizner,et al.  Influence of movement speed on accuracy and coordination of reaching movements to memorized targets in three-dimensional space in a deafferented subject , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  L. Merabet,et al.  The plastic human brain cortex. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. , 1997, Science.

[19]  Proprioceptive deafferentation slows down the processing of visual hand feedback. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[20]  J. Vercher,et al.  Vision of the hand prior to movement onset allows full motor adaptation to a multi-force environment , 2006, Brain Research Bulletin.

[21]  J. Sanes,et al.  Motor control in humans with large-fiber sensory neuropathy. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[22]  J C Rothwell,et al.  Manual motor performance in a deafferented man. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  Fabrice R. Sarlegna,et al.  Impairment of online control of reaching movements with aging: A double-step study , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[25]  Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Interaction of visual and proprioceptive feedback during adaptation of human reaching movements. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  C. Bourdin,et al.  Visual feedback of the moving arm allows complete adaptation of pointing movements to centrifugal and Coriolis forces in human subjects , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[27]  J. Lackner,et al.  Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Gary W Thickbroom,et al.  Dual representation of the hand in the cerebellum: activation with voluntary and passive finger movement , 2003, NeuroImage.

[29]  E. Sedgwick,et al.  The perceptions of force and of movement in a man without large myelinated sensory afferents below the neck. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  G. Gauthier,et al.  Oculo-manual tracking of visual targets in monkey: role of the arm afferent information in the control of arm and eye movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  Philip N. Sabes,et al.  Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  E. Naito,et al.  Visuokinesthetic Perception of Hand Movement is Mediated by Cerebro–Cerebellar Interaction between the Left Cerebellum and Right Parietal Cortex , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Pointing movement in an artificial perturbing inertial field: A prospective paradigm for motor control study , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  Jean-Louis Vercher,et al.  The contribution of proprioceptive feedback to sensorimotor adaptation , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Limb position drift: implications for control of posture and movement. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  J. D. Cooke,et al.  Initial agonist burst duration changes with movement amplitude in a deafferented patient , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  Marc Jeannerod,et al.  Lack of conscious recognition of one's own actions in a haptically deafferented patient , 2002, Neuroreport.

[38]  Matthew W. G. Dye,et al.  Do deaf individuals see better? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  R L Sainburg,et al.  Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  C. Bard,et al.  Control of single-joint movements in deafferented patients: evidence for amplitude coding rather than position control , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  C. Bard,et al.  Contribution of proprioception for calibrating and updating the motor space. , 1995, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[42]  Fabrice R Sarlegna,et al.  Influence of Feedback Modality on Sensorimotor Adaptation: Contribution of Visual, Kinesthetic, and Verbal Cues , 2007, Journal of motor behavior.

[43]  V. Gurfinkel,et al.  Proprioceptive consequences of tendon vibration during movement. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Characteristics of motor programs underlying arm movements in monkeys. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  E Bizzi,et al.  Motor learning by field approximation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Progress in Motor Control :A Multidisciplinary Perspective , 2009 .

[48]  M. Kawato,et al.  Visual Feedback Is Not Necessary for the Learning of Novel Dynamics , 2007, PloS one.

[49]  E. Taub,et al.  Use of Sensory Recombination and Somatosensory Deafferentation Techniques in the Investigation of Sensory-Motor Integration , 1974, Perception.

[50]  T. Ebner,et al.  Hereditary cerebellar ataxia progressively impairs force adaptation during goal-directed arm movements. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  C. Ghez,et al.  Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  Ian M Franks,et al.  Updating of an internal model without proprioception: a deafferentation study , 2006, Neuroreport.

[54]  B. Day,et al.  Vestibular-evoked postural responses in the absence of somatosensory information. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[55]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Kinematics and Dynamics Are Not Represented Independently in Motor Working Memory: Evidence from an Interference Study , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  M. Hallett,et al.  PET study of visually and non-visually guided finger movements in patients with severe pan-sensory neuropathies and healthy controls , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[57]  Andrew A G Mattar,et al.  Motor Learning by Observing , 2005, Neuron.

[58]  F. W. Mott,et al.  Experiments on the Influence of Sensory Nerves upon Movement and Nutrition of the Limbs. , 1895 .

[59]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Massive cortical reorganization after sensory deafferentation in adult macaques. , 1991, Science.

[60]  M. Harvey,et al.  Age-related differences in corrected and inhibited pointing movements , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[61]  A. McIntosh,et al.  Time course of changes in brain activity and functional connectivity associated with long-term adaptation to a rotational transformation. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[62]  C. Bard,et al.  Weight judgment. The discrimination capacity of a deafferented subject. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[63]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[64]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Differential cortical and subcortical activations in learning rotations and gains for reaching: a PET study. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[65]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  The Computational Neurobiology of Reaching and Pointing: A Foundation for Motor Learning , 2004 .

[66]  Kurt A. Thoroughman,et al.  Motor Adaptation Scaled by the Difficulty of a Secondary Cognitive Task , 2008, PloS one.

[67]  J. Gordon,et al.  Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. II. Effects of visual information on accuracy. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.