Advance Preparation in Task Switching

The preparation effect in task switching is usually interpreted to mean that a switching process makes use of the interval between task-cue onset and trial-stimulus onset (the cue-stimulus interval, or CSI) to accomplish some of its work ahead of time. This study undermines the empirical basis for this interpretation and suggests that task activation, not task switching, is the functional process in cognitive control. Experiments 1 and 2 used an explicit cuing paradigm, and Experiments 3 and 4 used a variation in which the trial after a task cue was followed by several cueless trials, requiring retention of the cue in memory. Experiments 1 and 3 replicated the preparation effect on switch cost, and Experiments 2 and 4 showed that this effect vanishes when CSI is manipulated between subjects, leaving only a main effect of CSI when the task cue is a memory load.

[1]  K. Murphy,et al.  Statistical Power Analysis: A Simple and General Model for Traditional and Modern Hypothesis Tests, Second Ediction , 1998 .

[2]  Hilde Haider,et al.  Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: evidence from the use of probability cues. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  S. Monsell.  Task switching , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  B. Hommel,et al.  Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus–task bindings in task-shift costs , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Wai-Tat Fu,et al.  Soft constraints in interactive behavior: the case of ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Executive Control of Thought and Action , 2003 .

[7]  I. Koch.  The role of external cues for endogenous advance reconfiguration in task switching , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  N. Meiran.  Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. , 1996 .

[10]  I. Koch,et al.  The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  I Koch,et al.  Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[13]  Albert Erlebacher,et al.  Design and analysis of experiments contrasting the within- and between-subjects manipulation of the independent variable. , 1977 .

[14]  R. Kliegl,et al.  Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[16]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks following severe closed-head injury. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[17]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Relation of task switching to speed, age, and fluid intelligence. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[18]  S. Monsell.  Task-set reconfiguration processes do not imply a control homunuculus: Reply to Altmann , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  R. A. Carlson,et al.  Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Forgetting to Remember: The Functional Relationship of Decay and Interference , 2002, Psychological science.

[21]  J R Anderson,et al.  Task preparation and task repetition: two-component model of task switching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Memory for goals: an activation-based model , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  E. C. Poulton,et al.  Influential companions: Effects of one strategy on another in the within-subjects designs of cognitive psychology. , 1982 .

[24]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[25]  Myeong-Ho Sohn,et al.  Stimulus-related priming during task switching , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Torsten B. Neilands,et al.  Power analysis for multivariate and repeated measures designs: A flexible approach using the SPSS MANOVA procedure , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[27]  E Ruthruff,et al.  Switching between simple cognitive tasks: the interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  A F Kramer,et al.  Task coordination and aging: explorations of executive control processes in the task switching paradigm. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[29]  N. Yeung,et al.  Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: the role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[31]  T. Shallice,et al.  Task Switching : A PDP Model , 2001 .

[32]  Erik M. Altmann,et al.  Task switching and the pied homunculus: where are we being led? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  D Gopher,et al.  Switching tasks and attention policies. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  Erik M Altmann,et al.  Functional decay of memory for tasks , 2002, Psychological research.

[35]  D. Meyer,et al.  Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  N. Meiran.  Modeling cognitive control in task-switching , 2000, Psychological research.

[37]  G. Logan,et al.  Clever homunculus: is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  R De Jong,et al.  An intention-activation account of residual switch costs , 2000 .