Informal Learning with Technology: The Effects of Self-Constructing Externalizations

ABSTRACT Especially in the context of technology-enhanced informal learning, it is crucial to understand how to design information sources in such a way that learners are not overwhelmed by the demands of the learning process, but at the same time are engaged in higher order thinking processes. Guidance aids learners in dealing with the demands of a learning process. The authors examined the effects of different levels of guidance provided by an information source. To this end, the effects of a preconstructed externalization are compared to a self-constructed externalization. Thirty-eight students participated in the study. The results revealed no significant differences between the groups with respect to posttest retention. However, performance in application tasks was promoted by the condition associated with a lower level of guidance. This suggests that having learners self-construct an externalization might be a suitable means to elicit learners’ higher order thinking processes in technology-enhanced informal learning.

[1]  S. Ainsworth.  DeFT: A Conceptual Framework for Considering Learning with Multiple Representations. , 2006 .

[2]  F. Fischer,et al.  A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[3]  D. Krathwohl.  A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview , 2002 .

[4]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  AI in Reverse: Computer Tools That Turn Cognitive , 1988 .

[5]  Olusola O. Adesope,et al.  Learning With Concept and Knowledge Maps: A Meta-Analysis , 2006 .

[6]  Andrew T. Stull,et al.  Three Experimental Comparisons of Learner-generated versus Author-provided Graphic Organizers , 2007 .

[7]  D. Livingstone.  Adults' Informal Learning: Definitions, Findings, Gaps, and Future Research. NALL Working Paper #21. , 2001 .

[8]  Aly Anwar Amer,et al.  The effect of knowledge-map and underlining training on the reading comprehension of scientific texts , 1994 .

[9]  Dietrich Albert,et al.  Knowledge Spaces: Theories, Empirical Research, and Applications , 1998 .

[10]  Hee Seung Lee,et al.  Student learning: what has instruction got to do with it? , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[11]  D. Schugurensky,et al.  The forms of informal learning: towards a conceptualization of the field , 2000 .

[12]  Heriot-Watt.  A theoretical view on concept mapping , 2008 .

[13]  C. Bonwell,et al.  Active learning : creating excitement in the classroom , 1991 .

[14]  Karen E. Watkins,et al.  Informal and Incidental Learning , 2001 .

[15]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[16]  T. Richter,et al.  Eine revidierte Fassung des Inventars zur Computerbildung (INCOBI-R) , 2010 .

[17]  R. Bangert-Drowns,et al.  The Effects of School-Based Writing-to-Learn Interventions on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis , 2004 .

[18]  Susanne P. Lajoie,et al.  Computer Environments as Cognitive Tools for Enhancing Learning , 2013 .

[19]  Ioanna Vekiri.  What Is the Value of Graphical Displays in Learning? , 2002 .

[20]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  The Nature of External Representations in Problem Solving , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Gijsbert Erkens,et al.  The effects of inspecting and constructing part-task-specific visualizations on team and individual learning , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Susanne Narciss,et al.  Benefits and Constraints of Distributed Cognition in Foreign Language Learning , 2008 .

[23]  Antje Proske.  Wissenschaftliches Schreiben: Konzeption und Realisierung computerbasierter Trainingsaufgaben , 2007 .

[24]  Peter A. Rubba,et al.  Scoring Concept Maps: An Expert Map-Based Scheme Weighted for Relationships , 2002 .

[25]  Hermann Körndle,et al.  TEE - The Electronic Exercise , 2005, Leipziger Informatik-Tage.

[26]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[27]  Jan H. F. Meyer,et al.  Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge , 2006 .

[28]  T. S. Hilbert,et al.  Concept mapping as a follow-up strategy to learning from texts: what characterizes good and poor mappers? , 2008 .

[29]  Pearl Chen,et al.  Moments of Joy , 2003 .

[30]  J. Elizabeth Richey,et al.  How much is too much? Learning and motivation effects of adding instructional explanations to worked examples , 2013 .

[31]  Richard F. Schmid,et al.  Supporting the Learning Process with Collaborative Concept Mapping Using Computer-Based Communication Tools and Processes , 2001 .

[32]  D. Perkins.  Constructivism and troublesome knowledge , 2006 .

[33]  R. Cox.  Representation construction, externalised cognition and individual differences , 1999 .

[34]  Stephen M. Fiore,et al.  Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive processes in low verbal ability learners: Use of diagrams in computer-based training environments , 2002 .

[35]  A. Renkl,et al.  How Effective are Instructional Explanations in Example-Based Learning? A Meta-Analytic Review , 2010 .

[36]  R. Mayer.  Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[37]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.