Finite volume Ghost Fluid Method implementation of interfacial forces in PISO loop

Abstract In this work, we implement interfacial forces (surface tension, hydrostatic and viscous forces) by enlisting the finite volume discretization of GFM (Ghost Fluid Method) using A-CLSVOF (Algebraic Coupled Level-Set/Volume-of-Fluid) method for the mass conservative, and smooth interface description. The widely used PISO momentum solution to resolve the pressure–velocity coupling is presented along with the present GFM discretization and its placement within the PISO loop. The pressure jump at the interface due to the interfacial forces is made sharp via direct calculation of the modified pressure matrix coefficients corresponding to targeted interfacial cells, and as a source term for the jump value itself. The Level-Set field is enlisted for curvature computation in A-CLSVOF and for the interpolation and weighting of the relative contribution of the capillary force in adjacent for the matrix coefficients in the FV framework. To assess the A-CLSVOF/GFM performance, four canonical cases were studied. In the case of a static droplet in suspension, A-CLSVOF/GFM produces a sharp and accurate pressure jump compared to the traditional CSF implementation of A-CLSVOF. The interaction of viscous and capillary forces is proven to be accurate and consistent with theoretical results for the classical capillary wave. For the linear two-layer shear flow, GFM sharp treatment of the viscosity captured the velocity gradient across the interface and removed the diffusion of the viscous stresses caused by the discontinuous material properties. Finally, the combination of all GFM improvements proposed in this study are compared to experimental findings of terminal velocity for a gaseous bubble rising in a viscous fluid. GFM outperforms CSF with errors of 4.6% and 14.0% respectively.

[1]  S. Osher,et al.  A Non-oscillatory Eulerian Approach to Interfaces in Multimaterial Flows (the Ghost Fluid Method) , 1999 .

[2]  Stéphane Popinet,et al.  An accurate adaptive solver for surface-tension-driven interfacial flows , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[3]  A. Gosman,et al.  Solution of the implicitly discretised reacting flow equations by operator-splitting , 1986 .

[4]  Mark Sussman,et al.  A sharp interface method for incompressible two-phase flows , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[5]  G. Kreiss,et al.  A conservative level set method for two phase flow II , 2005, Journal of Computational Physics.

[6]  Majid Haghshenas,et al.  Algebraic coupled level set-volume of fluid method for surface tension dominant two-phase flows , 2017 .

[7]  Ronald Fedkiw,et al.  A monolithic mass tracking formulation for bubbles in incompressible flow , 2013, J. Comput. Phys..

[8]  J. G. Hnat,et al.  Spherical cap bubbles and skirt formation , 1976 .

[9]  R. Fedkiw,et al.  A Boundary Condition Capturing Method for Poisson's Equation on Irregular Domains , 2000 .

[10]  M. Trujillo,et al.  Evaluating the performance of the two-phase flow solver interFoam , 2012 .

[11]  Akio Tomiyama,et al.  Effects of Numerical Treatment of Viscous and Surface Tension Forces on Predicted Motion of Interface , 2014 .

[12]  H. Jasak,et al.  Implementation of the Ghost Fluid Method for Free Surface Flows in Polyhedral Finite Volume Framework , 2017 .

[13]  Ronald Fedkiw,et al.  Regular Article: The Ghost Fluid Method for Deflagration and Detonation Discontinuities , 1999 .

[14]  Juntao Huang,et al.  Coupled ghost fluid/two‐phase level set method for curvilinear body‐fitted grids , 2007 .

[15]  Ronald Fedkiw,et al.  A Boundary Condition Capturing Method for Multiphase Incompressible Flow , 2000, J. Sci. Comput..

[16]  Frédéric Risso,et al.  On the computation of viscous terms for incompressible two-phase flows with Level Set/Ghost Fluid Method , 2015, J. Comput. Phys..

[17]  J. Brackbill,et al.  A continuum method for modeling surface tension , 1992 .

[18]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  An accurate conservative level set/ghost fluid method for simulating turbulent atomization , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..