Treatment of Diesel Particles Using an Electrostatic Agglomerator Under Negative DC Corona: A Modeling and Experimental Study

The aim of this paper is to characterize an electrostatic agglomerator with an innovative shape intended to collect diesel particles. The agglomerator consists of a tube-type electrofilter with a porous collecting electrode supplied by a negative dc operating voltage. The end of the device is closed, so all the treated gas passes through the collecting electrode. The stocking surface is very small, and the collecting electrode acts as a simple agglomerator. The specific electrical consumption is approximately 1 J/L for a 95% reduction in particle number. This agglomerator requires an extremely short residence time, in the same order of magnitude as the particle electrical charging time. The reentrained agglomerates clearly have micronic size and are very little in number, so that their characterization cannot be done easily by classical granulometers such as electrical low-pressure impactor or scanning mobility particle sizer. An approach to modeling the reentrained number distribution is proposed, which permits to confirm and explain many of the experimental results. Discrepancies between experimental results and numerical model predictions show that particle filtration may be highly enhanced by a dendrite layer actively maintained by an electric field.

[1]  I. Gallimberti Recent advancements in the physical modelling of electrostatic precipitators , 1998 .

[2]  Friedrich Löffler,et al.  Electrostatic agglomeration and centrifugal separation of diesel soot particles , 1994 .

[3]  Hsunling Bai,et al.  A Model to Predict the System Performance of an Electrostatic Precipitator for Collecting Polydisperse Particles , 1995 .

[4]  J. Borra,et al.  Unipolar field charging of particles by electrical discharge: effect of particle shape , 2004 .

[5]  John S. Anagnostopoulos,et al.  Corona discharge simulation in wire-duct electrostatic precipitator , 2002 .

[6]  Mobility of permeable aggregates: effects of shape and porosity , 2004 .

[7]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Further studies of electrostatic collection and agglomeration of diesel particles , 1991 .

[8]  P. Lawless,et al.  Particle charging bounds, symmetry relations, and an analytic charging rate model for the continuum regime , 1996 .

[9]  J. Keskinen,et al.  Secondary particle collection mechanisms in ELPI , 2000 .

[10]  Wolfgang Peukert,et al.  Industrial separation of fine particles with difficult dust properties , 2001 .

[11]  P. Biswas,et al.  Experimental and theoretical studies of ultra-fine particle behavior in electrostatic precipitators , 2000 .

[12]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE ELECTRICAL LOW-PRESSURE IMPACTOR (ELPI) , 2000 .

[13]  C. Sioutas,et al.  Electrostatic Enhancement of the Collection Efficiency of Stainless Steel Fiber Filters , 2000 .

[14]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  The Performance of an Electrostatic Agglomerator as a Diesel Soot Emission Control Device , 1990 .

[15]  K. Naumann COSIMA—a computer program simulating the dynamics of fractal aerosols , 2003 .

[16]  S. Matsusaka,et al.  Reentrainment of deposited particles by drag and aerosol collision , 2003 .

[17]  Zi-Niu Wu,et al.  Applications of upwind and downwind schemes for calculating electrical conditions in a wire-plate electrostatic precipitator , 2004 .

[18]  C. P. Yu,et al.  COAGULATION OF CIGARETTE SMOKE PARTICLES , 1999 .