Refining the phenotype of common mutations in Rett syndrome

Rett syndrome (RTT; MIM No 312750) is a neurodevelopmental disorder mainly affecting girls, with an incidence of 1:10 000 female births.1 The clinical features of the syndrome were first described in a series of publications2–5 during the decade after it was first reported in English language journals.6 At that time, in the absence of a biological marker, criteria to assist with the diagnosis were developed by an international working group.7 These criteria relate to the typical characteristics which are: normal prenatal and perinatal period and apparently normal development for the first six months of life; deceleration in head growth; loss of hand and communication skills between six and 30 months; apparent severe psychomotor retardation; acquisition of stereotypical hand movements; and evidence of gait or truncal apraxia between one and four years. These necessary criteria were supplemented by a set of supportive but not mandatory criteria, which help to delineate the phenotype further. These include breathing dysfunction, EEG abnormalities, seizures, spasticity, peripheral vasomotor disturbance, scoliosis, growth retardation, and hypotrophic small feet. In 1999 the association between Rett syndrome and mutations in the methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MECP2; MIM No 300005) located on Xq28 was first identified.8 In the last decade there had already been much commentary about the expanding clinical spectrum of Rett syndrome and the occurrence of atypical forms.9 This culminated in 2001 in a meeting to revise the existing diagnostic criteria.10 It is now clear that, although this condition must be considered a severe neurodevelopmental disorder, there is still considerable variation in both functioning and associated morbidity, even in those cases with confirmed MECP2 mutations. We have been able to demonstrate this variability11 using a tool to measure functional ability12 and three clinical scales. The first was developed by …

[1]  H. Moser,et al.  Rett syndrome--natural history in 70 cases. , 1986, American journal of medical genetics. Supplement.

[2]  A. Renieri,et al.  Preserved speech variants of the Rett syndrome: molecular and clinical analysis. , 2001, American journal of medical genetics.

[3]  I. Veyver Skewed X inactivation in X-linked disorders. , 2001 .

[4]  Andrew J. Grimm,et al.  RettBASE: The IRSA MECP2 variation database—a new mutation database in evolution , 2003, Human mutation.

[5]  M. Msall,et al.  The Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM) , 1994, Clinical pediatrics.

[6]  M. Msall,et al.  Describing the phenotype in Rett syndrome using a population database , 2003, Archives of disease in childhood.

[7]  H. Smeets,et al.  Mapping of a de novo unequal crossover causing a deletion of the steroid 21-hydroxylase (CYP21A2) gene and a non-functional hybrid tenascin-X (TNXB) gene , 2003, Journal of medical genetics.

[8]  N. Laing,et al.  Effects of MECP2 mutation type, location and X‐inactivation in modulating Rett syndrome phenotype , 2003, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[9]  D. Cooper,et al.  Long-read sequence analysis of the MECP2 gene in Rett syndrome patients: correlation of disease severity with mutation type and location. , 2000, Human molecular genetics.

[10]  J Dragich,et al.  Rett syndrome: a surprising result of mutation in MECP2. , 2000, Human molecular genetics.

[11]  H. Zoghbi,et al.  Rett syndrome is caused by mutations in X-linked MECP2, encoding methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[12]  P. Huppke,et al.  Rett syndrome: analysis of MECP2 and clinical characterization of 31 patients. , 2000, Human molecular genetics.

[13]  S. Ishii,et al.  The Ski Protein Family Is Required for MeCP2-mediated Transcriptional Repression* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  H. Zoghbi,et al.  Influence of mutation type and X chromosome inactivation on Rett syndrome phenotypes , 2000, Annals of neurology.

[15]  I. B. Van den Veyver Skewed X inactivation in X-linked disorders. , 2001, Seminars in reproductive medicine.

[16]  P. Huppke,et al.  Indication for genetic testing: a checklist for Rett syndrome. , 2003, The Journal of pediatrics.

[17]  J. Chelly,et al.  Two affected boys in a Rett syndrome family , 2000, Neurology.

[18]  B. Hagberg,et al.  Rett variants: a suggested model for inclusion criteria. , 1994, Pediatric neurology.

[19]  P. Huppke,et al.  Influence of mutation type and location on phenotype in 123 patients with Rett syndrome. , 2002, Neuropediatrics.

[20]  H. Marks,et al.  Detection of new paternal dystrophin gene mutations in isolated cases of dystrophinopathy in females. , 1994, American journal of human genetics.

[21]  H. Zoghbi,et al.  Rett syndrome and beyond: recurrent spontaneous and familial MECP2 mutations at CpG hotspots. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[22]  M. Coleman,et al.  Rett syndrome: a survey of North American patients. , 2008, Journal of mental deficiency research.

[23]  E. Monrós,et al.  Rett syndrome in Spain: mutation analysis and clinical correlations , 2001, Brain and Development.

[24]  E. Hoffman,et al.  MeCP2 mutations in children with and without the phenotype of Rett syndrome , 2001, Neurology.

[25]  Lester R Curtin,et al.  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2000 growth charts for the United States: improvements to the 1977 National Center for Health Statistics version. , 2002, Pediatrics.

[26]  A. Silahtaroglu,et al.  MECP2 mutations in Danish patients with Rett syndrome: High frequency of mutations but no consistent correlations with clinical severity or with the X chromosome inactivation pattern , 2001, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[27]  J. Ono,et al.  Mutational analysis of MECP2 in Japanese patients with atypical Rett syndrome , 2001, Brain and Development.

[28]  K. Yamakawa,et al.  Mutational analysis of the MECP2 gene in Japanese patients with Rett syndrome , 2000, Journal of Human Genetics.

[29]  Sheena Reilly,et al.  The Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ): refining the behavioural phenotype of Rett syndrome. , 2002, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[30]  J. Christodoulou,et al.  InterRett and RettBASE: International Rett Syndrome Association Databases for Rett Syndrome , 2003, Journal of child neurology.

[31]  J. Stephenson,et al.  A study of the natural history of Rett syndrome in 23 girls. , 1986, American journal of medical genetics. Supplement.

[32]  S. Budden Rett syndrome: studies of 13 affected girls. , 1986, American journal of medical genetics. Supplement.

[33]  P. Jonveaux,et al.  MECP2 mutations account for most cases of typical forms of Rett syndrome. , 2000, Human molecular genetics.

[34]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Rett syndrome: confirmation of X-linked dominant inheritance, and localization of the gene to Xq28. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[35]  H. Zoghbi,et al.  Rett syndrome: methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 mutations and phenotype-genotype correlations. , 2000, American journal of medical genetics.

[36]  M. Schwartz,et al.  A 77-year-old woman and a preserved speech variant among the Danish Rett patients with mutations in MECP2 , 2001, Brain and Development.

[37]  F. Hanefeld,et al.  An update on clinically applicable diagnostic criteria in Rett syndrome. Comments to Rett Syndrome Clinical Criteria Consensus Panel Satellite to European Paediatric Neurology Society Meeting, Baden Baden, Germany, 11 September 2001. , 2002, European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society.

[38]  Jean Aicardi,et al.  A progressive syndrome of autism, dementia, ataxia, and loss of purposeful hand use in girls: Rett's syndrome: Report of 35 cases , 1983, Annals of neurology.

[39]  Masaya Segawa,et al.  Guidelines for reporting clinical features in cases with MECP2 mutations , 2001, Brain and Development.

[40]  D. English,et al.  The prevalence and incidence of Rett syndrome in Australia. , 1997, European child & adolescent psychiatry.