A prospective evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of dyssynchrony in the prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

BackgroundMany patients with electrical dyssynchrony who undergo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) do not obtain substantial benefit. Assessing mechanical dyssynchrony may improve patient selection. Results from studies using echocardiographic imaging to measure dyssynchrony have ultimately proved disappointing. We sought to evaluate cardiac motion in patients with heart failure and electrical dyssynchrony using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). We developed a framework for comparing measures of myocardial mechanics and evaluated how well they predicted response to CRT.MethodsCMR was performed at 1.5 Tesla prior to CRT. Steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine images and complementary modulation of magnetization (CSPAMM) tagged cine images were acquired. Images were processed using a novel framework to extract regional ventricular volume-change, thickening and deformation fields (strain). A systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI) for all parameters within a 16-segment model of the ventricle was computed with high SDI denoting more dyssynchrony. Once identified, the optimal measure was applied to a second patient population to determine its utility as a predictor of CRT response compared to current accepted predictors (QRS duration, LBBB morphology and scar burden).ResultsForty-four patients were recruited in the first phase (91% male, 63.3 ± 14.1 years; 80% NYHA class III) with mean QRSd 154 ± 24 ms. Twenty-one out of 44 (48%) patients showed reverse remodelling (RR) with a decrease in end systolic volume (ESV) ≥ 15% at 6 months. Volume-change SDI was the strongest predictor of RR (PR 5.67; 95% CI 1.95-16.5; P = 0.003). SDI derived from myocardial strain was least predictive. Volume-change SDI was applied as a predictor of RR to a second population of 50 patients (70% male, mean age 68.6 ± 12.2 years, 76% NYHA class III) with mean QRSd 146 ± 21 ms. When compared to QRSd, LBBB morphology and scar burden, volume-change SDI was the only statistically significant predictor of RR in this group.ConclusionA systolic dyssynchrony index derived from volume-change is a highly reproducible measurement that can be derived from routinely acquired SSFP cine images and predicts RR following CRT whilst an SDI of regional strain does not.

[1]  Laura G. Qualls,et al.  QRS duration, bundle-branch block morphology, and outcomes among older patients with heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2013, JAMA.

[2]  Theodore P Abraham,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of ventricular dyssynchrony: current and emerging concepts. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Long-term prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy is related to the extent of left ventricular reverse remodeling at midterm follow-up. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[5]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[6]  J. Daubert,et al.  The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Usefulness of QRS duration to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  Catherine Klersy,et al.  Interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony are common in heart failure patients, regardless of QRS duration. , 2004, European heart journal.

[9]  Katherine C. Wu,et al.  Cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of dyssynchrony and myocardial scar predicts function class improvement following cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[10]  John D Ferguson,et al.  Impact of mechanical activation, scar, and electrical timing on cardiac resynchronization therapy response and clinical outcomes. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Relationship Between QRS Duration and Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony in Patients with End‐Stage Heart Failure , 2004, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[12]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  A Comprehensive Cardiac Motion Estimation Framework Using Both Untagged and 3-D Tagged MR Images Based on Nonrigid Registration , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Frans Van de Werf,et al.  Left ventricular quantification with breath-hold MR imaging: comparison with echocardiography , 1995, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[14]  G. Gintant,et al.  Heterogeneity within the ventricular wall. Electrophysiology and pharmacology of epicardial, endocardial, and M cells. , 1991, Circulation research.

[15]  Warren J Manning,et al.  Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Open Access Circumferential Myocardial Strain in Cardiomyopathy with and without Left Bundle Branch Block , 2022 .

[16]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Accelerated whole‐heart 3D CSPAMM for myocardial motion quantification , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  H. Jensen,et al.  Left Ventricular Lead Performance in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Impact of Lead Localization and Complications , 2005, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[18]  S. Saba,et al.  Echocardiography-Guided Left Ventricular Lead Placement for Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyClinical Perspective , 2013 .

[19]  E. Zerhouni,et al.  Human heart: tagging with MR imaging--a method for noninvasive assessment of myocardial motion. , 1988, Radiology.

[20]  Sebastian Kelle,et al.  Visualization of the cardiac venous system using cardiac magnetic resonance. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[21]  A E Becker,et al.  Left ventricular fibre architecture in man. , 1981, British heart journal.

[22]  Lluís Mont,et al.  2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). , 2013, European heart journal.

[23]  Kevin D Costa,et al.  Contribution of laminar myofiber architecture to load-dependent changes in mechanics of LV myocardium. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[24]  David Begley,et al.  Targeted left ventricular lead placement to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy: the TARGET study: a randomized, controlled trial. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  Kawal S. Rhode,et al.  Benefits of Endocardial and Multisite Pacing Are Dependent on the Type of Left Ventricular Electric Activation Pattern and Presence of Ischemic Heart Disease: Insights from Electroanatomic Mapping , 2012, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[26]  J. Nielsen,et al.  ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy , 2014 .

[27]  M. Frenneaux,et al.  Late gadolinium enhancement-cardiovascular magnetic resonance as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. , 2007, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[28]  G M Hutchins,et al.  Relation of regional cross-fiber shortening to wall thickening in the intact heart. Three-dimensional strain analysis by NMR tagging. , 1994, Circulation.

[29]  S. Kapetanakis,et al.  Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: A Novel Technique to Quantify Global Left Ventricular Mechanical Dyssynchrony , 2005, Circulation.

[30]  S. Saba,et al.  Impact of scar burden by single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging on patient outcomes following cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2011, European heart journal.

[31]  J. Ross,et al.  Fiber Orientation in the Canine Left Ventricle during Diastole and Systole , 1969, Circulation research.

[32]  Michael R Rosen,et al.  Biological Pacemaker Implanted in Canine Left Bundle Branch Provides Ventricular Escape Rhythms That Have Physiologically Acceptable Rates , 2004, Circulation.

[33]  R M Heethaar,et al.  Timing of cardiac contraction in humans mapped by high-temporal-resolution MRI tagging: early onset and late peak of shortening in lateral wall. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[34]  E. Atalar,et al.  Regional heterogeneity of human myocardial infarcts demonstrated by contrast-enhanced MRI. Potential mechanisms. , 1995, Circulation.

[35]  Rolf H H Groenwold,et al.  Overestimation of risk ratios by odds ratios in trials and cohort studies: alternatives to logistic regression , 2012, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[36]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  A Registration-Based Propagation Framework for Automatic Whole Heart Segmentation of Cardiac MRI , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[37]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) Trial , 2008, Circulation.

[38]  John Gorcsan,et al.  Echocardiography-Guided Left Ventricular Lead Placement for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results of the Speckle Tracking Assisted Resynchronization Therapy for Electrode Region Trial , 2013, Circulation. Heart failure.