An externalities-based decentralized optimal power allocation algorithm for wireless networks

The rapidly growing demand for wireless communication makes efficient power allocation a critical factor in the network's efficient operation. Power allocation in decentralized wireless systems, where the transmission of a user creates interference to other users and directly affects their utilities, has been recently studied by pricing methods. However, pricing methods do not result in efficient/optimal power allocations for such systems for the following reason. Systems where a user's actions directly affect the utilities of other users are known to have externalities. It is well known from Mas-Colell et al. that in systems with externalities, standard efficiency theorems on market equilibrium do not apply and pricing methods do not result in Pareto optimal outcomes. In this paper, we formulate the power allocation problem for a wireless network as an allocation problem with "externalities." We consider a system where each user knows only its own utility and the channel gains from the transmitters of other users to its own receiver. The system has multiple interference temperature constraints to control interference. We present a decentralized algorithm to allocate transmission powers to the users. The algorithm takes into account the externality generated to the other users by the transmission of each user, satisfies the informational constraints of the system, overcomes the inefficiency of pricing mechanisms and guarantees convergence to globally optimal power allocations.

[1]  Patrick Saint-Pierre,et al.  Planning with Externalities , 1979 .

[2]  Cem U. Saraydar,et al.  Efficient power control via pricing in wireless data networks , 2002, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[3]  Cem U. Saraydar,et al.  Pricing and power control in a multicell wireless data network , 2001, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[4]  Sergio Verdu,et al.  Multiuser Detection , 1998 .

[5]  W. Rudin Principles of mathematical analysis , 1964 .

[6]  Ilya Segal,et al.  Solutions manual for Microeconomic theory : Mas-Colell, Whinston and Green , 1997 .

[7]  Gerard J. Foschini,et al.  A simple distributed autonomous power control algorithm and its convergence , 1993 .

[8]  J. Lions Optimal Control of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations , 1971 .

[9]  Ness B. Shroff,et al.  Utility-based power control in cellular wireless systems , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[10]  R. Aumann Agreeing to disagree. , 1976, Nature cell biology.

[11]  Kenneth Hoffman,et al.  Analysis in Euclidean Space , 1975 .

[12]  E. Maskin The Theory of Implementation in Nash Equilibrium: A Survey , 1983 .

[13]  D. Goodman,et al.  A New Framework for Power Control in Wireless Data Networks: Games, Utility, and Pricing , 2002 .

[14]  Eitan Altman,et al.  CDMA Uplink Power Control as a Noncooperative Game , 2002, Wirel. Networks.

[15]  D. Teneketzis,et al.  Asymptotic agreement among communicating decisionmakers , 1984 .

[16]  J.-L. Lions,et al.  Eclatement et Decentralisation en Calcul des Variations , 1970 .

[17]  Michael L. Honig,et al.  Forward-link CDMA resource allocation based on pricing , 2000, 2000 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference. Conference Record (Cat. No.00TH8540).

[18]  Ching-Yao Huang,et al.  Non-cooperative uplink power control in cellular radio systems , 1998, Wirel. Networks.

[19]  Ness B. Shroff,et al.  Downlink power allocation for multi-class CDMA wireless networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.