Effect of G40R mutation on the binding of human SRY protein to DNA: A molecular dynamics view

Molecular dynamics simulation was conducted to investigate the reason why the mutant G40R of hSRY protein has a low affinity for DNA. Compared with the previous dynamics results of the wild‐type hSRY‐HMG–DNA complex, the results of molecular dynamics simulation on the mutant G40R hSRY‐HMG–DNA system demonstrated that the whole structure of DNA (especially the second strand) had a major deviation away from the short arm of the HMG box. Consequently, the DNA and the mutant protein could not specifically recognize each other, that is, very different, and low‐occupancy, direct, and water‐mediated hydrogen bonds were detected at the protein–DNA interface, no conformational changes occurred at the loop region around Met9 during the simulation, and residue Ile13 did not intercalate between the bases of A5 and A6. These results indicated that the mutant G40R did not form a specific complex with the DNA target, hence led to complete gonadal dysgenesis. From the simulation, we realized that the residue Gly40 played a critical structural role in the hSRY–DNA recognition. It might be a structural supporting point of DNA binding because of the absence of a side chain. The reason for the difficulty of the mutant G40R to form a complex with DNA might be that the long and positively charged side chain of Arg40 by its bulk and positive charge hindered the DNA's access to the active sites of the protein. Proteins 1999;35:101–113. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  P. Kraulis,et al.  Structure of the HMG box motif in the B‐domain of HMG1. , 1993, EMBO Journal.

[2]  J. Nakae,et al.  A novel mutation localized in the 3' non-HMG box region of the SRY gene in 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis. , 1994, Human molecular genetics.

[3]  Robin Lovell-Badge,et al.  A gene from the human sex-determining region encodes a protein with homology to a conserved DNA-binding motif , 1990, Nature.

[4]  E. Laue,et al.  Structure of the A-domain of HMG1 and its interaction with DNA as studied by heteronuclear three- and four-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[5]  P. Goodfellow,et al.  Interaction of normal and mutant SRY proteins with DNA. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[6]  J. Schwabe,et al.  The role of water in protein-DNA interactions. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[7]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Molecular determinants ofmammalian sex , 1996 .

[8]  L. Nilsson,et al.  Interaction of human SRY protein with DNA: A molecular dynamics study , 1998, Proteins.

[9]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  P. Kraulis,et al.  Structure of the HMG box motif in the B‐domain of HMG1. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[11]  P. Kraulis A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures , 1991 .

[12]  T. Härd,et al.  Thermodynamics of sequence-specific protein-DNA interactions. , 1996, Biophysical chemistry.

[13]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  An all-atom empirical energy function for the simulation of nucleic acids , 1995 .

[14]  J. Keeler,et al.  The solution structure and dynamics of the DNA-binding domain of HMG-D from Drosophila melanogaster. , 1994, Structure.

[15]  M. Karplus,et al.  Deformable stochastic boundaries in molecular dynamics , 1983 .

[16]  P N Goodfellow,et al.  DNA binding activity of recombinant SRY from normal males and XY females. , 1992, Science.

[17]  P. Goodfellow,et al.  Sex determination in humans , 1996, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[18]  M. Weiss,et al.  The SRY high-mobility-group box recognizes DNA by partial intercalation in the minor groove: a topological mechanism of sequence specificity. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1978, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[20]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Molecular basis of human 46X,Y sex reversal revealed from the three-dimensional solution structure of the human SRY-DNA complex , 1995, Cell.

[21]  M. Karplus,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations in biology , 1990, Nature.

[22]  M Karplus,et al.  Polar hydrogen positions in proteins: Empirical energy placement and neutron diffraction comparison , 1988, Proteins.

[23]  P. Goodfellow,et al.  Evolutionary conservation in the DNA-binding and -bending properties of HMG-boxes from SRY proteins of primates. , 1995, Gene.

[24]  A M Gronenborn,et al.  Intercalation, DNA Kinking, and the Control of Transcription , 1996, Science.

[25]  H. Ostrer,et al.  Mutations and sequence variants in the testis-determining region of the Y chromosome in individuals with a 46,XY female phenotype , 1997, Human Genetics.

[26]  P. Goodfellow,et al.  Rapid sequence evolution of the mammalian sex-determining gene SRY , 1993, Nature.

[27]  P. Cary,et al.  Solution structure of a DNA-binding domain from HMG1. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.

[28]  R Grosschedl,et al.  HMG domain proteins: architectural elements in the assembly of nucleoprotein structures. , 1994, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[29]  P. Donahoe,et al.  Molecular basis of mammalian sexual determination: activation of Müllerian inhibiting substance gene expression by SRY. , 1994, Science.

[30]  Lin Yuan,et al.  What is the solution? , 1984, Nature.

[31]  A. Sinclair,et al.  Mutations in SRY and SOX9: Testis‐determining genes , 1997, Human mutation.

[32]  R. Lovell-Badge,et al.  Sex‐reversing mutations affect the architecture of SRY‐DNA complexes. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[33]  V. P. Chuprina,et al.  Solution Structure of the Sequence-specific HMG Box of the Lymphocyte Transcriptional Activator Sox-4 (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[35]  B. Tidor Molecular dynamics simulations , 1997, Current Biology.

[36]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[37]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[38]  H. Berendsen,et al.  ALGORITHMS FOR MACROMOLECULAR DYNAMICS AND CONSTRAINT DYNAMICS , 1977 .