Wired for Her Face? Male Attentional Bias for Female Faces

Under conditions of inattention or deficits in orienting attention, special classes of stimuli (e.g. faces, bodies) are more likely to be perceived than other stimuli. This suggests that biologically salient visual stimuli automatically recruit attention, even when they are task-irrelevant or ignored. Here we report results from a behavioral experiment with female and male subjects and two magnetoencephalography (MEG) experiments with male subjects only, in which we investigated attentional capture with face and hand stimuli. In both the behavioral and MEG experiments, subjects were required to count the number of gender-specific targets from either face or hand categories within a block of stimuli. In the behavioral experiment, we found that male subjects were significantly more accurate in response to female than male face target blocks. There was no corresponding effect found in response to hand target blocks. Female subjects did not show a gender-based difference in response to face or hand target blocks. MEG results indicated that the male subjects’ responses to face stimuli in primary visual cortex (V1) and the face-selective part of the fusiform gyrus (FG) were reduced when male face stimuli were not relevant to the task, whereas female faces maintained a strong response in these areas in both task-relevant and task-irrelevant conditions. These results suggest that within the male brain, female face stimuli are more resilient to suppression than male faces, once attention is drawn to the part of the visual field where the face appears.

[1]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[2]  K. Bötzel,et al.  Electric brain potentials evoked by pictures of faces and non-faces: a search for “face-specific” EEG-potentials , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Andreas A. Ioannides,et al.  Consistent and precise localization of brain activity in human primary visual cortex by MEG and fMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[4]  K. Nakamura,et al.  The human amygdala plays an important role in gaze monitoring. A PET study. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  John G. Taylor,et al.  Mathematical analysis of lead field expansions , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Anna S. Law,et al.  Attention capture by faces , 2008, Cognition.

[7]  R. Dolan,et al.  Effects of Attention and Emotion on Face Processing in the Human Brain An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2001, Neuron.

[8]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[9]  Andreas A. Ioannides,et al.  Exploratory data analysis of evoked response single trials based on minimal spanning tree , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  P. Downing,et al.  Bodies capture attention when nothing is expected , 2004, Cognition.

[11]  Nicholas I. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Circular Data , 1993 .

[12]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Andreas A. Ioannides,et al.  Single Trial Analysis of Neurophysiological Correlates of the Recognition of Complex Objects and Facial Expressions of Emotion , 2004, Brain Topography.

[14]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[15]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[16]  G. Alexander,et al.  Sex Differences in Adults’ Relative Visual Interest in Female and Male Faces, Toys, and Play Styles , 2009, Archives of sexual behavior.

[17]  P. Ekman Pictures of Facial Affect , 1976 .

[18]  P. Vuilleumier,et al.  Faces call for attention: evidence from patients with visual extinction , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Michael A. Skelly,et al.  “Nonparametric”A’ and other modern misconceptions about signal detection theory , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Covert visual attention modulates face-specific activity in the human fusiform gyrus: fMRI study. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  B. Mazoyer,et al.  Neural Correlates of Woman Face Processing by 2-Month-Old Infants , 2002, NeuroImage.

[22]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[23]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. , 1998, Science.

[26]  M Corbetta,et al.  Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. , 1990, Science.

[27]  E. Halgren,et al.  Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  Naruhito Hironaga,et al.  Localization of individual area neuronal activity , 2007, NeuroImage.

[29]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The functional organization of human extrastriate cortex: a PET-rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  Alumit Ishai,et al.  Face Perception Is Modulated by Sexual Preference , 2006, Current Biology.

[31]  G. Glover,et al.  Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  Andreas A Ioannides,et al.  Widely Distributed Magnetoencephalography Spikes Related to the Planning and Execution of Human Saccades , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  A. A. Ioannides,et al.  The timing of face selectivity and attentional modulation in visual processing , 2008, Neuroscience.

[34]  Attentional capture of emotional static and dynamic hand gestures and faces : the effect of valence in a novel stroop-based paradigm , 2008 .

[35]  A. Ioannides,et al.  Continuous probabilistic solutions to the biomagnetic inverse problem , 1990 .

[36]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Representation of the Gender of Human Faces by Infants: A Preference for Female , 2002, Perception.

[37]  M. Eimer,et al.  The processing of emotional facial expression is gated by spatial attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.