Automatic colorimetric calibration of human wounds

BackgroundRecently, digital photography in medicine is considered an acceptable tool in many clinical domains, e.g. wound care. Although ever higher resolutions are available, reproducibility is still poor and visual comparison of images remains difficult. This is even more the case for measurements performed on such images (colour, area, etc.). This problem is often neglected and images are freely compared and exchanged without further thought.MethodsThe first experiment checked whether camera settings or lighting conditions could negatively affect the quality of colorimetric calibration. Digital images plus a calibration chart were exposed to a variety of conditions. Precision and accuracy of colours after calibration were quantitatively assessed with a probability distribution for perceptual colour differences (dE_ab). The second experiment was designed to assess the impact of the automatic calibration procedure (i.e. chart detection) on real-world measurements. 40 Different images of real wounds were acquired and a region of interest was selected in each image. 3 Rotated versions of each image were automatically calibrated and colour differences were calculated.Results1st Experiment: Colour differences between the measurements and real spectrophotometric measurements reveal median dE_ab values respectively 6.40 for the proper patches of calibrated normal images and 17.75 for uncalibrated images demonstrating an important improvement in accuracy after calibration. The reproducibility, visualized by the probability distribution of the dE_ab errors between 2 measurements of the patches of the images has a median of 3.43 dE* for all calibrated images, 23.26 dE_ab for all uncalibrated images. If we restrict ourselves to the proper patches of normal calibrated images the median is only 2.58 dE_ab! Wilcoxon sum-rank testing (p < 0.05) between uncalibrated normal images and calibrated normal images with proper squares were equal to 0 demonstrating a highly significant improvement of reproducibility. In the second experiment, the reproducibility of the chart detection during automatic calibration is presented using a probability distribution of dE_ab errors between 2 measurements of the same ROI.ConclusionThe investigators proposed an automatic colour calibration algorithm that ensures reproducible colour content of digital images. Evidence was provided that images taken with commercially available digital cameras can be calibrated independently of any camera settings and illumination features.

[1]  C. Munro,et al.  The clinical photography of Herbert Brown: a perspective on early 20th Century dermatology , 2001, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[2]  Yves Vander Haeghen,et al.  An imaging system with calibrated color image acquisition for use in dermatology , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Gordon M Miskelly,et al.  Background correction in forensic photography. I. Photography of blood under conditions of non-uniform illumination or variable substrate color--theoretical aspects and proof of concept. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[4]  Yves Vander Haeghen Development of a dermatological workstation with calibrated acquisition and management of color images to the follow-up of patients with an increased risk of skin cancer , 2000 .

[5]  Dale Purves,et al.  The empirical basis of color perception , 2002, Consciousness and Cognition.

[6]  Ashish C Bhatia,et al.  The clinical image: archiving clinical processes and an entire specialty. , 2006, Archives of dermatology.

[7]  Mark D. Fairchild,et al.  A top down description of S-CIELAB and CIEDE2000 , 2003 .

[8]  J Feit,et al.  [Acquiring images with very high resolution using a composing method]. , 2004, Ceskoslovenska patologie.

[9]  Alex Byrne,et al.  Color realism and color science , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  Gordon M. Miskelly,et al.  Background Correction in Forensic Photography , 2003 .

[11]  Roger S Riley,et al.  Digital photography: A primer for pathologists , 2004, Journal of clinical laboratory analysis.

[12]  J. D. Mollon,et al.  The comparison of spatially separated colours , 2006, Vision Research.

[13]  Nicolas Vandenbroucke,et al.  Color image segmentation by analysis of subset connectedness and color homogeneity properties , 2006, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[14]  D. Mery,et al.  Color measurement in L ¿ a ¿ b ¿ units from RGB digital images , 2006 .

[15]  L. Dubertret,et al.  Quantitative and kinetic evolution of wound healing through image analysis , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  A. Hoppe,et al.  Analysis of Skin Wound Images Using Digital Color Image Processing: A Preliminary Communication , 2004, The international journal of lower extremity wounds.

[17]  William F G Tucker,et al.  Digital imaging: a diagnostic screening tool? , 2004, International journal of dermatology.

[18]  Jens C. Türp,et al.  The color of human gingiva and mucosa: visual measurement and description of distribution , 2005, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[19]  J. Naeyaert,et al.  A new digital image analysis system useful for surface assessment of vitiligo lesions in transplantation studies. , 2004, European journal of dermatology : EJD.

[20]  Nick Harkness,et al.  The colour wheels of art, perception, science and physiology , 2006 .

[21]  Gordon M Miskelly,et al.  Background correction in forensic photography. II. Photography of blood under conditions of non-uniform illumination or variable substrate color--practical aspects and limitations. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[22]  Cathy Thomas Hess,et al.  The Art of Skin and Wound Care Documentation , 2005, Home healthcare nurse.

[23]  R. Caffesse,et al.  Computer assisted image analysis methods for evaluation of periodontal wound healing. , 2001, Brazilian dental journal.

[24]  Yves Vander Haeghen,et al.  Consistent cutaneous imaging with commercial digital cameras. , 2006, Archives of dermatology.

[25]  T. Ono,et al.  A pitfall in clinical photography: the appearance of skin lesions depends upon the illumination device , 2002, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[26]  Geoffrey McLennan,et al.  Color analysis of the human airway wall , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[27]  Ilias Maglogiannis,et al.  A system for the acquisition of reproducible digital skin lesions images. , 2003, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[28]  David L Streiner,et al.  "Precision" and "accuracy": two terms that are neither. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[29]  A. Lim,et al.  Imaging the skin , 2003, The Australasian journal of dermatology.

[30]  M. Trelles,et al.  Photography in dermatology: comparison between slides and digital imaging , 2003, Journal of cosmetic dermatology.

[31]  Gr Kanthraj,et al.  Classification and design of teledermatology practice: What dermatoses? Which technology to apply? , 2009, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[32]  Rinaldo Bellomo,et al.  Evidence-based medicine: Classifying the evidence from clinical trials – the need to consider other dimensions , 2006, Critical care.

[33]  Stephen Gilmore,et al.  Modelling skin disease: Lessons from the worlds of mathematics, physics and computer science , 2005, The Australasian journal of dermatology.

[34]  David J Goldberg Digital photography, confidentiality, and teledermatology. , 2004, Archives of dermatology.

[35]  S. Prasad,et al.  Digital photography in medicine. , 2003, Journal of postgraduate medicine.

[36]  N. Scheinfeld,et al.  Photographic images, digital imaging, dermatology, and the law. , 2004, Archives of dermatology.