High Rate of Fusion in Sheep Cervical Spines Following Anterior Interbody Surgery With Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Implant Devices

Study Design. Fourteen sheep were fused using anterior interbody implants at C2–C3 and C4–C5 and followed for 6 months. Objective. To evaluate the effect of absorbable and nonabsorbable implants on fusion rate, cage migration, and implant integrity. Summary of Background Data. Despite the high clinical success rate with metallic plates and interbody grafting, complications such as dysphagia, imaging artifacts, and revision difficulties exist. Less permanent and lower profile implants could minimize these problems. Methods. Four treatments were studied: 1) carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) cage alone, 2) CFRP cage with an absorbable tension band, 3) absorbable cage with an absorbable tension band, and 4) absorbable cage with a titanium plate. Fusion was assessed using radiographs, biomechanical testing, and micro-CT analysis. Results. Treatments with the CFRP cage alone had the lowest fusion rate at 3 months (2/6) and 6 months (4/6). The CFRP cage with the absorbable strap treatments had 5/6 fusions at 6 months. The absorbable cage with absorbable strap also had 5/6 fusions, but two of the cages fractured. The absorbable cage with titanium plate had 5/6 fusions, but the one partial fusion was attributed to poor screw and plate placement. Conclusion. Using both absorbable and nonabsorbable implants, high fusion rates were achieved in the challenging sheep cervical spine model. However, the absorbable cages were not able to withstand the mechanical forces during the 6-month survival period.

[1]  G. Fogel,et al.  Surgical treatment of dysphagia after anterior cervical interbody fusion. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[2]  J. Carrino,et al.  Use of a bioabsorbable anterior cervical plate in the treatment of cervical degenerative and traumatic disc disruption. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  Jeffrey C. Wang,et al.  The effect of cervical plating on single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. , 1999, Journal of spinal disorders.

[4]  C. Niu,et al.  Maintenance of Interbody Space in One- and Two-Level Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion: Comparison of the Effectiveness of Autograft, Allograft, and Cage , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  Thomas Mittlmeier,et al.  Bone morphogenetic protein-2 application by a poly(D,L-lactide)-coated interbody cage: in vivo results of a new carrier for growth factors. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  R. Bartels,et al.  Height of cervical foramina after anterior discectomy and implantation of a carbon fiber cage. , 2001, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  J. Clarisse,et al.  Discectomies of the lower cervical spine using interbody biopolymer (B.O.P.) implants , 1989, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[8]  R Wolfe,et al.  Sagittal gait patterns in spastic diplegia. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  R. Engelman,et al.  Suitability of bioresorbable cages for anterior cervical fusion. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  R. Delfini,et al.  Use of carbon fiber cages for treatment of cervical myeloradiculopathies. , 2004, Surgical neurology.

[11]  K. Kaneda,et al.  In vitro biomechanical investigation of the stability and stress-shielding effect of lumbar interbody fusion devices. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.

[12]  S. L. Griffith,et al.  A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of an Anterior Cervical Fusion Cage , 2000, Spine.

[13]  A. Shalabi,et al.  A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between the Cloward Procedure and a Carbon Fiber Cage in the Cervical Spine: A Clinical and Radiologic Study , 2002, Spine.

[14]  Thomas Mittlmeier,et al.  Influence of cage design on interbody fusion in a sheep cervical spine model. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  J. Krauss,et al.  Comparative evaluation of microdiscectomy only, autograft fusion, polymethylmethacrylate interposition, and threaded titanium cage fusion for treatment of single-level cervical disc disease: a prospective randomized study in 125 patients. , 2002, Neurosurgical focus.

[16]  N. Crawford,et al.  In vivo evaluation of bioresorbable polylactide implants for cervical graft containment in an ovine spinal fusion model. , 2004, Neurosurgical focus.

[17]  B. Bai,et al.  Assessment of a synthetic anterior cervical ligament in a spinal fusion model in sheep. , 2002, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[18]  D. Kunz,et al.  Anterior Cervical Discectomy, Fusion, and Plating: A Comparative Animal Study , 1993, Spine.

[19]  R. Friedman,et al.  Pre-clinical in vivo evaluation of orthopaedic bioabsorbable devices. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[20]  B E Fredrickson,et al.  Interference screw fixation of cervical grafts: a biomechanical study of a new method of cervical fixation. , 1991, Journal of spinal disorders.

[21]  N S Brooke,et al.  Preliminary experience of carbon fibre cage prostheses for treatment of cervical spine disorders. , 1997, British journal of neurosurgery.

[22]  W. Edwards,et al.  Interference screw fixation of cervical grafts. A combined in vitro biomechanical and in vivo animal study. , 1993, Spine.

[23]  E. Tessitore,et al.  Implantation of an empty carbon fiber composite frame cage after single-level anterior cervical discectomy in the treatment of cervical disc herniation: preliminary results. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[24]  E. Ferrer,et al.  Results of the Biocompatible Osteoconductive Polymer (BOP) as an Intersomatic Graft in Anterior Cervical Surgery , 1998, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[25]  C. Edwards,et al.  Accurate identification of adverse outcomes after cervical spine surgery. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  O. Böstman,et al.  Clinical biocompatibility of biodegradable orthopaedic implants for internal fixation: a review. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[27]  B. Subach,et al.  Anterior Cervical Plating Enhances Arthrodesis after Discectomy and Fusion with Cortical Allograft , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[28]  Min S. Park,et al.  Stabilization of Anterior Cervical Spine with Bioabsorbable Polymer in One- and Two-level Fusions , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[29]  Edward J. Goldberg,et al.  Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? , 2004, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[30]  Jeffrey C. Wang,et al.  Increased Fusion Rates With Cervical Plating for Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion , 2000, Spine.

[31]  C. Arienta,et al.  Two-level anterior cervical discectomy and cage-assisted fusion without plates. , 2002, Neurosurgical focus.

[32]  T. Lanman,et al.  Early findings in a pilot study of anterior cervical interbody fusion in which recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 was used with poly(L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide) bioabsorbable implants. , 2004, Neurosurgical focus.

[33]  Edward J. Goldberg,et al.  Is Autograft the Gold Standard in Achieving Radiographic Fusion in One-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Rigid Anterior Plate Fixation? , 2005, Spine.

[34]  T. Albert,et al.  Early findings in a pilot study of anterior cervical fusion in which bioabsorbable interbody spacers were used in the treatment of cervical degenerative disease. , 2004, Neurosurgical focus.

[35]  R. Engelman,et al.  Cervical spine fusion with bioabsorbable cages. , 2004, Neurosurgical focus.

[36]  T. Mittlmeier,et al.  IGF-I and TGF-beta1 application by a poly-(D,L-lactide)-coated cage promotes intervertebral bone matrix formation in the sheep cervical spine. , 2002, Spine.

[37]  N. Haas,et al.  Bioabsorbable Interbody Cages in a Sheep Cervical Spine Fusion Model , 2004, Spine.

[38]  K. Salame,et al.  The use of carbon fiber cages in anterior cervical interbody fusion: report of 100 cases. , 2002, Neurosurgical focus.