Refractive and Visual Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty Versus Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty With Hydrodissection for Treatment of Keratoconus

Purpose: To compare refractive and visual outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) with hydrodissection for keratoconus. Methods: A review of medical records was performed to identify 69 subjects (77 eyes) who had undergone keratoplasty by a single surgeon. Inclusion criteria were as follows: no episodes of rejection, no adverse events or complications intraoperatively or postoperatively, a fairly normal rate of epithelialization within 2 weeks, and suture removal after 11 months. Eyes were categorized according to the procedure: 47 had undergone DALK with hydrodissection (DALK group) and 30 had undergone PKP (PKP group). A between-group comparison was performed. Results: Before suture removal, there was no statistical difference between groups in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) or refraction at 6 months (P > 0.05, all cases). The mean BCVA was 0.18 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution for both groups at 12 months (just after suture removal) and 24 months postoperatively. The mean postoperative mean refractive spherical equivalents at 12 months and 2 years were −4.11 ± 3.4 diopters (D) and −4.68 ± 2.9 D, respectively, for the DALK group and −1.7 ± 2.7 D and −1.1 ± 3.6 D, respectively, for the PKP group. The DALK group was statistically more myopic at 12 and 24 months (P > 0.05, both cases). The mean refractive cylinders at 12 months and 2 years were 2.88 ± 1.60 D and 3.18 ± 1.70 D, respectively, for the DALK group and 2.80 ± 1.6 D and 3.80 ± 1.80 D, respectively, for the PKP group. The differences between groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05, all comparisons). Conclusions: Long-term BCVA, mean refractive spherical equivalent, and mean refractive cylinder after DALK with hydrodissection were similar to those after PKP.

[1]  T. Seiler,et al.  [Therapeutic cross-linking of the cornea using riboflavin/UVA]. , 2007, Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde.

[2]  S. Tuft,et al.  Quality of vision and graft thickness in deep anterior lamellar and penetrating corneal allografts. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  K. Tsubota,et al.  Comparison of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for lattice and macular corneal dystrophies. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  I. Avni,et al.  Penetrating Keratoplasty for Keratoconus: Long-Term Results , 2005, Cornea.

[5]  Catey Bunce,et al.  Comparison of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[6]  Paulo Ferrara,et al.  Ferrara intrastromal corneal rings for the correction of keratoconus , 2002, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  K. Tsubota,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of deep lamellar keratoplasty vs penetrating keratoplasty. , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  Mohammed Anwar,et al.  Big‐bubble technique to bare Descemet's membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplasty , 2002, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[9]  B. Cochener,et al.  INTACS inserts for treating keratoconus: one-year results. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[10]  M. Anwar,et al.  Fluid lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[11]  M. O'Keefe,et al.  Long-term outcome of epikeratophakia. , 1999, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  J. Singh,et al.  Deep lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for corneal lesions. , 1999, Cornea.

[13]  A. Loewenstein,et al.  Deep lamellar keratoplasty with complete removal of pathological stroma for vision improvement , 1998, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  E A Archila,et al.  Deep lamellar keratoplasty dissection of host tissue with intrastromal air injection. , 1984, Cornea.